A randomized clinical trial evaluating silicone earplugs for very low birth weight newborns in intensive care
C Abou Turk, A L Williams, R E Lasky, C Abou Turk, A L Williams, R E Lasky
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether very low birth weight (VLBW) newborns (<1500 g) wearing silicone earplugs grow larger and perform better on developmental exams than controls.
Study design: VLBW newborns (n=34) were randomized to wearing earplugs or not. Hospital outcomes were abstracted from medical charts by research staff masked to intervention status. Fourteen extremely low birth weight (ELBW) newborns (<1000 g) were also evaluated at 18 to 22 months.
Result: After adjusting for birth weight, 11 surviving newborns in the earplug group were 225 g (95% CI: 45, 405) heavier at 34 weeks post menstrual age than the 13 controls. Six ELBW earplug infants scored 15.53 points (95% CI: 3.03, 28.02) higher than six controls on the Bayley Mental Development Index. Their head circumferences were 2.59 cm (95% CI: 0.97, 4.21) larger.
Conclusion: Earplugs may facilitate weight gain in VLBW newborns. Better outcomes may persist at 18 to 22 months at least in ELBW infants.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00565357.
Figures
References
- Philbin MK, Lickliter R, Graven SN. Sensory experience and the developing organism: a history of ideas and view to the future. J Perinatol. 2000;20:S2–S5.
- Bremmer P, Byers JF, Kiehl E. Noise and the premature infant: physiological effects and practice implications. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003;32:447–454.
- Berens RJ, Weigle CG. Noise measurements during high-frequency oscillatory and conventional mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1995;108:1026–1029.
- Busch-Vishniac IJ, West JE, Barnhill C, Hunter T, Orellana D, Chivukula R. Noise Levels in Johns Hopkins Hospital. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118:3629–3645.
- American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health Noise: A hazard for the fetus and newborn. Pediatrics. 1997;100:724–727.
- Williams AL, Van Drongelen W, Lasky RE. Noise in contemporary neonatal intensive care. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007;121:2681–2690.
- Lasky RE, Williams AL. Noise and light exposures for ELBW newborns during their stay in the NICU. Pediatrics. In press.
- D'Agati S, Adams JA, Zabaleta IA, Abreu SJ, Sackner MA. The effect of noise reduction on behavioral states in newborns. Pediatr Res. 1994;35:221A.
- Zahr LK, Traversay J. Premature infant responses to noise reduction by earmuffs: effects on behavioral and physiologic measures. J Perinatol. 1995;15:448–455.
- Symington A, Pinelli J. The Cochrane Library. Issue. Update Software; Oxford: 2001. Developmental care for promoting development and preventing morbidity in preterm infants (Cochrane Review). p. 2.
- Ariagno RL, Thoman EB, Boeddiker MA, Kugener B, Constantinou JC, Mirmiran M, et al. Developmental care does not alter sleep and development of premature infants. Pediatrics. 1997;100:1–7e.
- Fleisher BE, Vandenberg K, Constantinou J, Heller C, Benitz WE, Johnson A, Rosenthal A, Stevenson DK. Individualized developmental care for very-low-birth-weight premature infants. Clin Pediatr. 1995;10:523–529.
- Resnick MB, Eyler FD, Nelson RM, Eitzman DV, Bucciarelli RL. Developmental intervention for low birth weight infants: improved early developmental outcome. Pediatrics. 1987;80:68–74.
- Resnick MB, Armstrong S, Carter RL. Developmental intervention program for high-risk premature infants: Effects on development and parent-infant interactions. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1988;9:73–78.
- Mann NP, Haddow R, Stokes L, Goodley S, Rutter N. Effect of night and day on preterm infants in a newborn nursery; randomized trial. Brit Med J. 1986;293:1265–1271.
- Fajardo B, Browning M, Fisher D, Paton J. Effect of nursery environment on state regulation in very low-birth infants. Infant Behav Dev. 1990;13:287–303.
- Strauch C, Brandt S, Edwards-Beckett J. Implementation of a quiet hour: effect on noise levels and infant sleep states. Neonatal Netw. 1993;12:31–35.
- Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams KR. An introduction to Bayesian methods in health technology assessment. Brit Med J. 1999;319:508–512.
Source: PubMed