A Systematic Review on Technology-Supported Interventions to Improve Old-Age Social Wellbeing: Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Connectedness

Francisco Ibarra, Marcos Baez, Luca Cernuzzi, Fabio Casati, Francisco Ibarra, Marcos Baez, Luca Cernuzzi, Fabio Casati

Abstract

Background: This review studies technology-supported interventions to help older adults, living in situations of reduced mobility, overcome loneliness, and social isolation. The focus is on long-distance interactions, investigating the (i) challenges addressed and strategies applied; (ii) technology used in interventions; and (iii) social interactions enabled.

Methods: We conducted a search on Elsevier's Scopus database for related work published until January 2020, focusing on (i) intervention studies supported mainly by technology-mediated communication, (ii) aiming at supported virtual social interactions between people, and (iii) evaluating the impact of loneliness or social isolation.

Results: Of the 1178 papers screened, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Computer and Internet training was the dominant strategy, allowing access to communication technologies, while in recent years, we see more studies aiming to provide simple, easy-to-use technology. The technology used was mostly off-the-shelf, with fewer solutions tailored to older adults. Social interactions targeted mainly friends and family, and most interventions focused on more than one group of people. Discussion. All interventions reported positive results, suggesting feasibility. However, more research is needed on the topic (especially randomized controlled trials), as evidenced by the low number of interventions found. We recommend more rigorous methods, addressing human factors and reporting technology usage in future research.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Copyright © 2020 Francisco Ibarra et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The full selection process, following the PRISMA statement guidelines.

References

    1. Berkman L. F., Syme S. L. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of alameda county residents. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1979;109(2):186–204. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112674.
    1. Seeman T. E., Berkman L. F., Blazer D., Rowe J. W. Social ties and support and neuroendocrine function: the MacArthur studies of successful aging. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1994;16(2):95–106.
    1. Barefoot J. C., Grønbæk M., Jensen G., Schnohr P., Prescott E. Social network diversity and risks of ischemic heart disease and total mortality: findings from the Copenhagen city heart study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2005;161(10):960–967. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi128.
    1. Brummett B. H., Barefoot J. C., Siegler I. C., et al. Characteristics of socially isolated patients with coronary artery disease who are at elevated risk for mortality. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2001;63(2):267–272. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200103000-00010.
    1. Cornwell E. Y., Waite L. J. Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2009;50(1):31–48. doi: 10.1177/002214650905000103.
    1. Fratiglioni L., Wang H.-X., Ericsson K., Maytan M., Winblad B. Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: a community-based longitudinal study. The Lancet. 2000;355(9212):1315–1319. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02113-9.
    1. Cacioppo J. T., Hughes M. E., Waite L. J., Hawkley L. C., Thisted R. A. Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychology and Aging. 2006;21(1):140–151. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140.
    1. Perissinotto C. M., Stijacic Cenzer I., Kenneth E. C. Loneliness in older persons: a predictor of functional decline and death. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2012;172(14):1078–1084. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1993.
    1. Holt-Lunstad J., Smith T. B., Baker M., Harris T., Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2015;10(2):227–237. doi: 10.1177/1745691614568352.
    1. de Jong Gierveld J., van Tilburg T., Dykstra P. A. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Loneliness and social isolation; pp. 485–500.
    1. Dykstra P. A. Older adult loneliness: myths and realities. European Journal of Ageing. 2009;6(2):91–100. doi: 10.1007/s10433-009-0110-3.
    1. Theeke L. A. Predictors of loneliness in U.S. adults over age sixty-five. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2009;23(5):387–396. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2008.11.002.
    1. Wilson C., Moulton B. Loneliness Among Older Adults: A National Survey of Adults 45+ Washington, DC, USA: AARP; 2010.
    1. Yang K., Victor C. R. The prevalence of and risk factors for loneliness among older people in China. Ageing and Society. 2008;28(3):305–327. doi: 10.1017/s0144686x07006848.
    1. Baez M., Nielek R., Casati F., Wierzbicki A. Ageing and Digital Technology. Singapore: Springer; 2019. Technologies for promoting social participation in later life; pp. 285–306.
    1. Pinquart M., Sorensen S. Influences on loneliness in older adults: a meta-analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2001;23(4):245–266. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp2304_2.
    1. Havens B., Hall M., Sylvestre G., Jivan T. Social isolation and loneliness: differences between older rural and urban Manitobans. Canadian Journal on Aging. 2004;23(2):129–140. doi: 10.1353/cja.2004.0022.
    1. Williams A., Nussbaum J. F. Intergenerational Communication Across the Life Span. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Routledge; 2001.
    1. Lin M.-C., Harwood J., Bonnesen J. L. Conversation topics and communication satisfaction in grandparent-grandchild relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 2002;21(3):302–323. doi: 10.1177/0261927x02021003005.
    1. Wenger G. C., Davies R., Shahtahmasebi S., Scott A. Social isolation and loneliness in old age: review and model refinement. Ageing and Society. 1996;16(3):333–358. doi: 10.1017/s0144686x00003457.
    1. DiMaggio P., Hargittai E., Neuman W. R., Robinson J. P. Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology. 2001;27(1):307–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307.
    1. Haythornthwaite C. Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society. 2005;8(2):125–147. doi: 10.1080/13691180500146185.
    1. Choi M., Kong S., Jung D. Computer and internet interventions for loneliness and depression in older adults: a meta-analysis. Healthcare Informatics Research. 2012;18(3):191–198. doi: 10.4258/hir.2012.18.3.191.
    1. Khosravi P., Ghapanchi A. H. Investigating the effectiveness of technologies applied to assist seniors: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2016;85(1):17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.014.
    1. Chen Y.-R. R., Schulz P. J. The effect of information communication technology interventions on reducing social isolation in the elderly: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2016;18(1):p. e18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4596.
    1. Grant M. J., Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2009;26(2):91–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
    1. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G., Group T. P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the Prisma statement. PLoS Medicine. 2009;6(7):1–6.
    1. World Health Organization. Definition of an Older or Elderly Person: Proposed Working Definition of an Older Person in Africa for the MDS Project. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2002.
    1. van Bel D. T., Smolders K. C. H. J., IJsselsteijn W. A., de Kort Y. Social connectedness: concept and measurement. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Environments; 2009; Barcelona, Spain.
    1. Ballantyne A., Trenwith L., Zubrinich S., Corlis M. “I feel less lonely”: what older people say about participating in a social networking website. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults. 2010;11(3):25–35. doi: 10.5042/qiaoa.2010.0526.
    1. Fokkema T., Knipscheer K. Escape loneliness by going digital: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a Dutch experiment in using ECT to overcome loneliness among older adults. Aging & Mental Health. 2007;11(5):496–504. doi: 10.1080/13607860701366129.
    1. Blažun H., Saranto K., Rissanen S. Impact of computer training courses on reduction of loneliness of older people in Finland and Slovenia. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012;28(4):1202–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.004.
    1. Chiu C.-J., Wu C. H. Information and communications technology as a health promotion method for older adults in assisted-living facilities: three-arm group-randomized trial. JMIR Aging. 2019;2 doi: 10.2196/12633.e12633
    1. Cotten S. R., Anderson W. A., McCullough B. M. Impact of internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013;15(2):p. e39. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2306.
    1. Czaja S. J., Boot W. R., Charness N., Rogers W. A., Sharit J. Improving social support for older adults through technology: findings from the PRISM randomized controlled trial. The Gerontologist. 2018;58(3):467–477. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw249.
    1. Gutierrez F. J., Ochoa S. F., Vassileva J. Mediating intergenerational family communication with computer-supported domestic technology. Proceedings of the CYTED-RITOS International Workshop on Groupware; 2017; Cham, Switzerland. Springer;
    1. Jarvis M. A., Padmanabhanunni A., Chipps J. An evaluation of a low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy mHealth-supported intervention to reduce loneliness in older people. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(7):p. 1305. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071305.
    1. Jarvis M. A., Chipps J., Padmanabhanunni A. “This phone saved my life”: older persons’ experiences and appraisals of an mHealth intervention aimed at addressing loneliness. Journal of Psychology in Africa. 2019;29(2):159–166. doi: 10.1080/14330237.2019.1594650.
    1. Larsson E., Padyab M., Larsson-Lund M., Nilsson I. Effects of a social Internet-based intervention programme for older adults: an explorative randomised crossover study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2016;79(10):629–636. doi: 10.1177/0308022616641701.
    1. Machesney D., Wexler S. S., Chen T., Coppola J. F. Gerontechnology companion: virtual pets for dementia patients. Proceedings of the IEEE Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology (LISAT) Conference 2014; May 2014; Farmingdale, NY, USA. pp. 1–3.
    1. Széman Z. A new pattern in long term care in Hungary: Skype and youth volunteers. Anthropological Notebooks. 2014;20:105–117.
    1. White H., McConnell E., Clipp E., et al. A randomized controlled trial of the psychosocial impact of providing Internet training and access to older adults. Aging & Mental Health. 2002;6(3):213–221. doi: 10.1080/13607860220142422.
    1. Cattan M., Kime N., Bagnall A.-M. The use of telephone befriending in low level support for socially isolated older people—an evaluation. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2011;19(2):198–206.
    1. Dodge H. H., Zhu J., Mattek N. C., et al. Web-enabled conversational interactions as a method to improve cognitive functions: results of a 6-week randomized controlled trial. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions. 2015;1(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2015.01.001.
    1. Garattini C., Wherton J., Prendergast D. Linking the lonely: an exploration of a communication technology designed to support social interaction among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2012;11(2):211–222. doi: 10.1007/s10209-011-0235-y.
    1. Baez M., Far I. K., Ibarra F., Ferron M., Didino D., Casati F. Effects of online group exercises for older adults on physical, psychological and social wellbeing: a randomized pilot trial. PeerJ. 2017;5:p. e3150. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3150.
    1. Banbury A., Chamberlain D., Nancarrow S., Dart J., Gray L., Parkinson L. Can videoconferencing affect older people’s engagement and perception of their social support in long-term conditions management: a social network analysis from the Telehealth Literacy Project. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2017;25(3):938–950. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12382.
    1. Neves B. B., Franz R., Judges R., Beermann C., Baecker R. Can digital technology enhance social connectedness among older adults? A feasibility study. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 2019;38(1):49–72. doi: 10.1177/0733464817741369.
    1. Isaacson M., Cohen I., Shpigelman C. N. Leveraging emotional wellbeing and social engagement of the oldest old by using advanced communication technologies: a pilot study using Uniper-Care’s technology. Proceedings of the 3rd IET International Conference on Technologies for Active and Assisted Living (TechAAL 2019); March 2019; London, UK. p. p. 5.
    1. Morton T. A., Wilson N., Haslam C., Birney M., Kingston R., McCloskey L.-G. Activating and guiding the engagement of seniors with online social networking: experimental findings from the AGES 2.0 project. Journal of Aging and Health. 2018;30(1):27–51. doi: 10.1177/0898264316664440.
    1. Myhre J. W., Mehl M. R., Glisky E. L. Cognitive benefits of online social networking for healthy older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2017;72(5):752–760. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw025.
    1. Neves B. B., Franz R. L., Munteanu C., Baecker R. Adoption and feasibility of a communication app to enhance social connectedness amongst frail institutionalized oldest old: an embedded case study. Information, Communication & Society. 2018;21(11):1681–1699. doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2017.1348534.
    1. Pauly T., Lay J. C., Kozik P., Graf P., Mahmood A., Hoppmann C. A. Technology, physical activity, loneliness, and cognitive functioning in old age. GeroPsych. 2019;32(3):111–123. doi: 10.1024/1662-9647/a000208.
    1. Tomasino K. N., Lattie E. G., Ho J., Palac H. L., Kaiser S. M., Mohr D. C. Harnessing peer support in an online intervention for older adults with depression. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2017;25(10):1109–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.04.015.
    1. Fitzpatrick K. K., Darcy A., Vierhile M. Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health. 2017;4(2):p. e19. doi: 10.2196/mental.7785.
    1. Mayhorn C. B., Stronge A. J., McLaughlin A. C., Rogers W. A. Older adults, computer training, and the systems approach: a formula for success. Educational Gerontology. 2004;30(3):185–203. doi: 10.1080/03601270490272124.
    1. Boyd K., Nugent C., Donnelly M., et al. Easisocial: an innovative way of increasing adoption of social media in older people. In: Bodine C., Helal S., Gu T., Mokhtari M., editors. Smart Homes and Health Telematics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 21–28.
    1. Coelho J., Duarte C. Socially networked or isolated? differentiating older adults and the role of tablets and television. In: Abascal J., Barbosa S., Fetter M., et al., editors. In Human-Computer Interaction—INTERACT 2015. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 129–146.
    1. Gutierrez F. J., Ochoa S. F., Vassileva J. Mediating asymmetries in family communication: supporting the eInclusion of older adults. In: Antona M., Stephanidis C., editors. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 438–448.
    1. Brooke J. SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry. 1996;189:p. 194.
    1. Barnard Y., Bradley M. D., Hodgson F., Lloyd A. D. Learning to use new technologies by older adults: perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013;29(4):1715–1724. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.006.
    1. Pinquart M., Sörensen S. Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging. 2000;15(2):187–224. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187.
    1. Ibarra F. Trento, Italy: University of Trento; 2018. The connective power of reminiscence—designing a reminiscence-based tool to increase social interactions in residential care. Ph.D. dissertation.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere