Intimate partner violence among African American and African Caribbean women: prevalence, risk factors, and the influence of cultural attitudes

Jamila K Stockman, Marguerite B Lucea, Richelle Bolyard, Desiree Bertand, Gloria B Callwood, Phyllis W Sharps, Doris W Campbell, Jacquelyn C Campbell, Jamila K Stockman, Marguerite B Lucea, Richelle Bolyard, Desiree Bertand, Gloria B Callwood, Phyllis W Sharps, Doris W Campbell, Jacquelyn C Campbell

Abstract

Background: Women of African descent are disproportionately affected by intimate partner abuse; yet, limited data exist on whether the prevalence varies for women of African descent in the United States and those in the US territories.

Objective: In this multisite study, we estimated lifetime and 2-year prevalence of physical, sexual, and psychological intimate partner abuse (IPA) among 1,545 women of African descent in the United States and US Virgin Islands (USVI). We also examined how cultural tolerance of physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence (IPV) influences abuse.

Design: Between 2009 and 2011, we recruited African American and African Caribbean women aged 18-55 from health clinics in Baltimore, MD, and St. Thomas and St. Croix, USVI, into a comparative case-control study. Screened and enrolled women completed an audio computer-assisted self-interview. Screening-based prevalence of IPA and IPV were stratified by study site and associations between tolerance of IPV and abuse experiences were examined by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Most of the 1,545 screened women were young, of low-income, and in a current intimate relationship. Lifetime prevalence of IPA was 45% in St. Thomas, 38% in St. Croix, and 37% in Baltimore. Lifetime prevalence of IPV was 38% in St. Thomas, 28% in St. Croix, and 30% in Baltimore. Past 2-year prevalence of IPV was 32% in St. Thomas, 22% in St. Croix, and 26% in Baltimore. Risk and protective factors for IPV varied by site. Community and personal acceptance of IPV were independently associated with lifetime IPA in Baltimore and St. Thomas.

Conclusions: Variance across sites for risk and protective factors emphasizes cultural considerations in sub-populations of women of African descent when addressing IPA and IPV in given settings. Individual-based interventions should be coupled with community/societal interventions to shape attitudes about use of violence in relationships and to promote healthy relationships.

Keywords: African American; African Caribbean; cultural attitudes; intimate partner abuse; intimate partner violence; women.

References

    1. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.
    1. Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. 2002;359:1331–6.
    1. Campbell DW, Sharps PW, Gary FA, Campbell JC, Lopez LM. Intimate partner violence in African American women. Online J Issues Nurs. 2002;7:5.
    1. West C. Black women and intimate partner violence: new directions for research. J Interpers Violence. 2004;19:1487–93.
    1. Hampton R, Oliver W, Magarian L. Domestic violence in the African American community: an analysis of social and structural factors. Violence Against Women. 2003;9:533–57.
    1. Cho H, Kim WJ. Racial differences in satisfaction with mental health services among victims of intimate partner violence. Community Ment Health J. 2012;48:84–90.
    1. Halpern C, Spriggs A, Martin S, Kupper L. Patterns of intimate partner violence victimization from adolescence to young adulthood in a nationally representative sample. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45:508–16.
    1. Breiding MJ, Black MC, Ryan GW. Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen US states/territories, 2005. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34:112–8.
    1. Walton-Moss BJ, Manganello J, Frye V, Campbell JC. Risk factors for intimate partner violence and associated injury among urban women. J Community Health. 2005;30:377–89.
    1. LeFranc E, Samms-Vaughan M, Hambleton I, Fox K, Brown D. Interpersonal violence in three Caribbean countries: Barbados, Jamaica, and Trinidad and Tobago. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2008;24:409–21.
    1. Bott S, Guedes A, Goodwin M, Mendoza J. Violence against women in Latin America and the Caribbean: a comparative analysis of population-based data from 12 countries. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization; 2012.
    1. Valente S. Evaluating intimate partner violence. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2002;14:505–16.
    1. Downer G, Callwood G. Developing an effective HIV/AIDS response for women and girls in the US Virgin Islands. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(6 Suppl):S283–6.
    1. City of Baltimore Department of Planning. An overview of 2010 census and Baltimore City. Available from: [cited 10 March 2014]
    1. Central Intelligence Agency. Central America and Caribbean: Virgin Islands; The world fact book. Available from: [cited 5 February 2014]
    1. Humphreys J, Campbell JC, editors. Family violence and nursing practice. New York: Springer; 2010.
    1. Saltzman L, Fanslow J, McMahon P, Shelley G. Intimate partner violence surveillance: uniform definitions and recommended data elements. 1.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1999.
    1. Basile K, Arias I, Desai S, Thompson MP. The differential association of intimate partner physical, sexual, psychological, and stalking violence and posttraumatic stress symptoms in a nationally representative sample of women. J Trauma Stress. 2004;17:413–21.
    1. Soeken K, Parker B, McFarlane J, Lominak MC. The abuse assessment screen: a clinical instrument to measure frequency, severity, and perpetrator of abuse against women. In: Campbell JC, editor. Empowering survivors of abuse: health care for battered women and their children. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998. pp. 195–203.
    1. Smith PH, Earp J, DeVellis R. Measuring battering: development of the women's experience with battering (WEB) scale. Womens Health. 1995;1:273–88.
    1. Smith P, Tessaro I, Earp J. Women's experiences with battering: a conceptualization from qualitative research. Womens Health Issues. 1995;5:173–82.
    1. Marshall LL. Development of the Severity of Violence Against Women Scales. J Fam Violence. 1992;7:103–21.
    1. García-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts C. WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against women: initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women's responses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
    1. Jones AS, Gielen AC, Campbell JC, Schollenberger J, Dienemann JA, Kub J, et al. Annual and lifetime prevalence of partner abuse in a sample of female HMO enrollees. Womens Health Issues. 1999;9:295–305.
    1. Trautman DE, McCarthy ML, Miller N, Campbell JC, Kelen GD. Intimate partner violence and emergency department screening: computerized screening versus usual care. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:526–34.
    1. Overstreet NM, Quinn DM. The intimate partner violence stigmatization model and barriers to help-seeking. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 2013;35:109–22.
    1. Lucea MB, Stockman JK, Mana-Ay M, Bertrand D, Callwood GB, Coverston CR, et al. Factors influencing resource use by African American and African Caribbean women disclosing intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2013;28:1617–41.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere