National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: VI. The 2014 Clinical Trial Design Working Group Report

Paul J Martin, Stephanie J Lee, Donna Przepiorka, Mary M Horowitz, John Koreth, Georgia B Vogelsang, Irwin Walker, Paul A Carpenter, Linda M Griffith, Gorgun Akpek, Mohamad Mohty, Daniel Wolff, Steven Z Pavletic, Corey S Cutler, Paul J Martin, Stephanie J Lee, Donna Przepiorka, Mary M Horowitz, John Koreth, Georgia B Vogelsang, Irwin Walker, Paul A Carpenter, Linda M Griffith, Gorgun Akpek, Mohamad Mohty, Daniel Wolff, Steven Z Pavletic, Corey S Cutler

Abstract

Treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease is intended to produce a sustainable benefit by reducing symptom burden, controlling objective manifestations of disease activity, preventing damage and impairment, and improving overall survival without causing disproportionate harms related to the treatment itself. Successful management can control the disease until systemic treatment is no longer needed. The complexity of the disease, the extended duration of follow-up needed to observe disease resolution and withdrawal of immunosuppressive treatment, and the lack of fully developed shorter term endpoints impede progress in the field. Identification and characterization of primary endpoints demonstrating clinical benefit without requiring years of follow-up is urgently needed, with the understanding that clinical benefit encompasses not only the self-evident benefit of the primary endpoint but also any other associated benefits. This report discusses regulatory considerations, eligibility criteria, the value of controlled trial designs, the merits of proposed primary endpoints, and key considerations elaborated from experience and progress during the past decade. The report concludes by mapping an overall approach that could support and lead to maximally informative clinical trials, especially those that seek to demonstrate clinical benefit along a pathway to regulatory review and approval.

Keywords: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation; Chronic graft-versus-host disease; Clinical trials; Consensus; Design; Guidelines.

Copyright © 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Appropriate management of chronic GVHD requires continuous recalibration of immunosuppressive treatment in order to avoid over- or under-treatment. The intensity of treatment required to control the disease decreases across time. Manifestations of chronic GVHD improve or are absent when the intensity of treatment (- - -) is above the threshold shown as the orange curve, and they worsen or recur when the intensity of treatment is below the threshold. The slope of the threshold varies among patients and can be determined only by serial attempts to decrease the intensity of treatment. Successful management of chronic GVHD can control the disease until systemic treatment is no longer needed to prevent recurrent or progressive disease activity or exacerbation of any residual damage ().

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere