High ANC coverage and low skilled attendance in a rural Tanzanian district: a case for implementing a birth plan intervention

Moke Magoma, Jennifer Requejo, Oona M R Campbell, Simon Cousens, Veronique Filippi, Moke Magoma, Jennifer Requejo, Oona M R Campbell, Simon Cousens, Veronique Filippi

Abstract

Background: In Tanzania, more than 90% of all pregnant women attend antenatal care at least once and approximately 62% four times or more, yet less than five in ten receive skilled delivery care at available health units. We conducted a qualitative study in Ngorongoro district, Northern Tanzania, in order to gain an understanding of the health systems and socio-cultural factors underlying this divergent pattern of high use of antenatal services and low use of skilled delivery care. Specifically, the study examined beliefs and behaviors related to antenatal, labor, delivery and postnatal care among the Maasai and Watemi ethnic groups. The perspectives of health care providers and traditional birth attendants on childbirth and the factors determining where women deliver were also investigated.

Methods: Twelve key informant interviews and fifteen focus group discussions were held with Maasai and Watemi women, traditional birth attendants, health care providers, and community members. Principles of the grounded theory approach were used to elicit and assess the various perspectives of each group of participants interviewed.

Results: The Maasai and Watemi women's preferences for a home birth and lack of planning for delivery are reinforced by the failure of health care providers to consistently communicate the importance of skilled delivery and immediate post-partum care for all women during routine antenatal visits. Husbands typically serve as gatekeepers of women's reproductive health in the two groups - including decisions about where they will deliver- yet they are rarely encouraged to attend antenatal sessions. While husbands are encouraged to participate in programs to prevent maternal-to-child transmission of HIV, messages about the importance of skilled delivery care for all women are not given emphasis.

Conclusions: Increasing coverage of skilled delivery care and achieving the full implementation of Tanzania's Focused Antenatal Care Package in Ngorongoro depends upon improved training and monitoring of health care providers, and greater family participation in antenatal care visits.

References

    1. Starrs A. Delivering for Women. Lancet. 2007;370(9595):1285–1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61549-9.
    1. United Nations Children's Fund. State of the world's children, 2008: Child survival. New York. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF); 2007.
    1. Carroli G, Rooney C, Villar J. How effective is antenatal care in preventing maternal mortality and serious morbidity? An overview of the evidence. Paediatr & Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15(suppl 1):1–42.
    1. Lindmark G, Berendes H, Meirik O. Antenatal care in developed countries. Paediatr & Perinat Epidemiol. 1998;12(suppl 2):4–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.12.s2.5.x.
    1. Campbell OMR, Graham WJ. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368:1284–1299. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1.
    1. Bloom SS, Lippeveld T, Wypij D. Does antenatal care make a difference to safe delivery? A study in urban Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Policy Plan. 1999;14(1):38–48. doi: 10.1093/heapol/14.1.38.
    1. Yanagisawa S, Oum S, Wakai S. Determinants of skilled birth attendance in rural Cambodia. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11(2):238–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01547.x.
    1. WHO/UNICEF. Antenatal care in developing countries: Promises, achievements and missed opportunities. Analysis of trends, levels and differentials 1990-2001. WHO, Geneva; 2003.
    1. Stanton C, Blanc AK, Croft T, Choi Y. Skilled care at birth in the developing world: progress to date and strategies for expanding coverage. J Biosoc Sci. 2007;39:109–120. doi: 10.1017/S0021932006001271.
    1. Hill K, Thomas K, AbouZahr C, Walker N, Say L, Inoue M, Suzuki E. on behalf of the maternal working group. Estimates of maternal mortality worldwide between 1990 and 2005: an assessment of the available data. Lancet. 2007;370(9595):1311–19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61572-4.
    1. United Nations Children's Fund. State of the world's children, 2009: Maternal and Newborn Health. New York. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF); 2009.
    1. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(8):1091–1110. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7.
    1. Ensor T, Cooper S. Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Planning. 2004;19(2):69–79. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh009.
    1. JHPIEGO. Monitoring birth preparedness and complication readiness. Tool and indicators for maternal and newborn health. Baltimore Maryland, USA; 2004.
    1. Carroli G, Rooney C, Villar J. How effective is antenatal care in preventing maternal mortality and serious morbidity? An overview of the evidence. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15(suppl 1):1–42.
    1. National Bureau of Statistics. Tanzania 2004-05 Demographic and Health Survey. Ministry of Economic Planning and Development. United Republic of Tanzania, Dar es salaam, Tanzania; 2006.
    1. Ministry of Health. Focused Antenatal care, Malaria and Syphilis in Pregnancy. Orientation package for Service Providers. Reproductive and Child Health Section, Dar es salaam, Tanzania. 2002.
    1. National Bureau of Statistics. Tanzania Service Provision Assessment Survey 2006. Dar es salaam, Tanzania and Macro International Inc, Calverton, Maryland USA; 2007.
    1. von Both C, Flebetaa S, Makuwani A, Mpembeni R, Jahn A. How much time do health services spend on antenatal care? Implications for the introduction of the focused antenatal care model in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006;6(1):22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-22.
    1. National Bureau of Statistics. Tanzania Population and Housing Census. Dar es salaam, Tanzania; 2002.
    1. Keusch GT, Wilentz J, Kleinman A. Stigma and global health: a research agenda. Lancet. 2006;367(9509):525–527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68183-X.
    1. Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE, McNeil ET. Collecting qualitative data: the science and the art. In Qualitative Methods. A field guide for applied Research in Sexual and Reproductive Health. Family Health International. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 2002. pp. 69–111.
    1. Glaser BG. Basics of grounded theory and analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1992.
    1. Denzin N. Sociological Methods: A sourcebook. Aldine Transactions Chicago. 2006.
    1. Rosenstock IM. Why people use health services. The Milbank Quarterly. 2005;83(4):1–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00425.x.
    1. Nikiema B, Beninguisse G, Haggerty JL. Providing information on pregnancy complications during antenatal visits: unmet educational needs in sub-Saharan Africa. Health Policy Planning. 2009;24:367–376. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp017.
    1. Pembe AB, Urassa DP, Carlstedt A, Lindmark G, Nystrom L, Darj E. Rural Tanzanian women's awareness of danger signs of obstetric complications. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2008. p. 9.
    1. Allen D. Managing Motherhood, Managing Risk. Fertility and Dangers in West Central Tanzania. University of Michigan, USA; 2002.
    1. Grossmann-Kindall F, Filippi V, De Koninck M, Kanhonou L. Giving birth in hospitals in Benin: testimonies of women. Reprod Health Matters. 2001;9(18):90–98. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(01)90095-3.
    1. World Health Organization. Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and newborn care: a guide for essential practice. WHO, Geneva; 2003.
    1. World Health Organization. Making Pregnancy Safer Initiative. Reproductive Health and Research Unit. WHO, Geneva; 2003. Working with individuals, families and communities to improve maternal and newborn health.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO antenatal care randomized trial: manual for the implementation of the new model. Geneva (document no WHO/RHR/01.30) 2001.
    1. Onah HE, Ikeako LC, Iloabachie GC. Factors associated with the use of maternity services in Enugu, southeastern Nigeria. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:1870–1878. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.019.
    1. Kyomuhendo GB. Low use of maternity services in Uganda: impact on women's status, traditional beliefs and limited resources. Reprod Health matters. 2003;11(21):16–26. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(03)02176-1.
    1. Asuquo EEJ, Etuk SJ, Duke F. Staff attitude as barrier to the utilization of University of Calabar Teaching Hospital for Obstetric care. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2000;4(2):69–73. doi: 10.2307/3583450.
    1. Kruk ME, Paczkowski M, Mbaruku G, de Pinho H, Galea S. Women's Preferences for Place of Delivery in Rural Tanzania: A Population-Based Discrete Choice Experiment. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1666–1672. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.146209.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere