Efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in posterior lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spinal stenosis with instability: a retrospective case control study

Stefan Endres, Martin Heinz, Axel Wilke, Stefan Endres, Martin Heinz, Axel Wilke

Abstract

Background: Degenerative spinal stenosis and instability requiring multilevel spine surgery has been associated with large blood losses. Factors that affect perioperative blood loss include time of surgery, surgical procedure, patient height, combined anterior/posterior approaches, number of levels fused, blood salvage techniques, and the use of anti-fibrinolytic medications. This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in spine surgery.

Methods: This retrospective case control study includes 97 patients who had to undergo surgery because of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and instability. All operations included spinal decompression, interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation (4-5 segments). Forty-six patients received 1 g tranexamic acid intravenous, preoperative and six hours and twelve hours postoperative; 51 patients without tranexamic acid administration were evaluated as a control group. Based on the records, the intra- and postoperative blood losses were measured by evaluating the drainage and cell saver systems 6, 12 and 24 hours post operation. Additionally, hemoglobin concentration and platelet concentration were reviewed. Furthermore, the number of red cell transfusions given and complications associated with tranexamic acid were assessed.

Results: The postoperative hemoglobin concentration demonstrated a statistically significant difference with a p value of 0.0130 showing superiority for tranexamic acid use (tranexamic acid group: 11.08 g/dl, SD: 1.68; control group: 10.29 g/dl, SD: 1.39). The intraoperative cell saver volume and drainage volume after 24 h demonstrated a significant difference as well, which indicates a less blood loss in the tranexamic acid group than the control group. The postoperative drainage volume at12 hours showed no significant differences; nor did the platelet concentration Allogenic blood transfusion (two red cell units) was needed for eight patients in the tranexamic acid group and nine in the control group because of postoperative anemia. Complications associated with the administration of tranexamic acid, e.g. renal failure, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism did not occur.

Conclusions: This study suggests a less blood loss when administering tranexamic acid in posterior lumbar spine surgery as demonstrated by the higher postoperative hemoglobin concentration and the less blood loss. But given the relatively small volume of blood loss in the patients of this study it is underpowered to show a difference in transfusion rates.

References

    1. Lentschener C, Cottin P, Bouaziz H. et al.Reduction of blood loss and transfusion requirement by aprotinin in posterior lumbar spine fusion. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:590–597.
    1. Tzortzopoulou A, Cepeda MS, Schumann R, Carr DB. Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. p. CD006883.
    1. Hill GE, Frawley WH, Griffith KE, Forestner JE, Minei JP. Allogeneic blood transfusion increases the risk of postoperative bacterial infection: A meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2003;54:908–914. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000022460.21283.53.
    1. Shapiro F, Zurakowski D, Sethna NF. Tranexamic acid diminishes intraoperative blood loss and transfusion in spinal fusions for duchenne muscular dystrophy scoliosis. Spine. 2007;32(20):2278–2283. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814cf139.
    1. Carless PA, Henry DA, Moxey AJ, O'Connell DL, Fergusson DA. Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;4
    1. Henry DA, Carless PA, Moxey AJ, O'Connell D, Forgie MA, Wells PS, Fergusson D. Pre-operative autologous donation for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2
    1. Laupacis A, Fergusson D. Erythropoietin to minimize perioperative blood transfusion: A systematic review of randomized trials. The International Study of Peri-operative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators. Transfus Med. 1998;8:309–317. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.1998.00171.x.
    1. Colomina MJ, Bagó J, Fuentes I. Do antifibrinolytics reduce allogeneic blood transfusion in orthopedic surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(16):1740–1741.
    1. Elwatidy S, Jamjoom Z, Elgamal E, Zakaria A, Turkistani A, El-Dawlatly A. Efficacy and safety of prophylactic large dose of tranexamic acid in spine surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) pp. 2577–80. 1152-1157.
    1. Urban MK, Beckman J, Gordon M. et al.The efficacy of antifibrinolytics in the reduction of blood loss during complex adult reconstructive spine surgery. Spine. 2001;26:1152–1157. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200105150-00012.
    1. Zohar E, Ellis M, Ifrach N, Stern A, Sapir O, Fredman B. The postoperative blood-sparing efficacy of oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid after total knee replacement. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1679–83.
    1. Mangano DT, Tudor IC, Dietzel C. The risk associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):353–365. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051379.
    1. Verma K, Errico TJ, Vaz KM, Lonner BS. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded single-site control study comparing blood loss prevention of tranexamic acid (TXA) to epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) for corrective spinal surgery. BMC Surg. 2010;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-10-13.
    1. Florentino-Pineda I, Thompson GH, Poe-Kochert C, Huang RP, Haber LL, Blakemore LC. The effect of amicar on perioperative blood loss in idiopathic scoliosis: the results of a prospective, randomized double-blind study. Spine. 2004;29(3):233–238. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000109883.18015.B9.
    1. Henry DA, Moxey AJ, Carless PA, O'Connell D, McClelland B, Henderson KM, Sly K, Laupacis A, Fergusson D. Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. p. CD001886.
    1. Neilipovitz DT, Murto K, Hall L, Barrowman NJ, Splinter WM. A randomized trial of tranexamic acid to reduce blood transfusion for scoliosis surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(1):82–87.
    1. Neilipovitz DT. Tranexamic acid for major spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S62–65.
    1. Sanderson PL, Wood PL. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in old people. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993;75:393–397.
    1. Shabat S, Arinzon Z, Folman Y. et al.Long-term outcome of decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians. Eur Spin J. 2007;17
    1. Rao SV, Eikelboom JA, Granger CB, Harrington RA, Califf RM, Bassand JP. Bleeding and blood transfusion issues in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1193–204. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm019.
    1. Yang X, Alexander KP, Chen AY, Roe MT, Brindis RG, Rao SV. et al.The Implications of Blood Transfusions for Patients With Non-ST - Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;46(8):1490–5.
    1. Baldus CR, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Okubadejo GO. Can we safely reduce blood loss during lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy procedures using tranexamic acid or aprotinin? A comparative study with controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) pp. 235–9.
    1. Colomina MJ, Bagó J, Vidal X, Mora L, Pellisé F. Antifibrinolytic therapy in complex spine surgery: a case-control study comparing aprotinin and tranexamic acid. Orthopedics. 2009;32(2):91.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere