Perturbation Training for Fall-Risk Reduction in Healthy Older Adults: Interference and Generalization to Opposing Novel Perturbations Post Intervention

Tanvi Bhatt, Yiru Wang, Shuaijie Wang, Lakshmi Kannan, Tanvi Bhatt, Yiru Wang, Shuaijie Wang, Lakshmi Kannan

Abstract

This study examined the effects of perturbation training on the contextual interference and generalization of encountering a novel opposing perturbation. One hundred and sixty-nine community-dwelling healthy older adults (69.6 ± 6.4 years) were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: slip-perturbation training (St, n = 67) group received 24 slips, trip-perturbation training (Tt, n = 67) group received 24 trips, and control (Ctrl: n = 31) group received only non-perturbed walking trials (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03199729; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03199729). After training, all groups had 30 min of rest and three post-training non-perturbed walking trials, followed by a reslip and a novel trip trial for St, a retrip and a novel slip trial for Tt, and randomized novel slip and trip trials for Ctrl. The margin of stability (MOS), step length, and toe clearance of post-training walking trials were compared among three groups to examine interferences in proactive adjustment. Falls, MOS at the instant of recovery foot touchdown, and hip height of post-training perturbation trials were investigated to detect interferences and generalization in reactive responses. Results indicated that prior adaptation to slip perturbation training, resulting in walking with a greater MOS (more anterior) and a shorter step length (p < 0.01) than that of the Ctrl group, would be associated with a greater likelihood to forward balance loss if encountered with a trip. The trip adaptation training mainly induced a higher toe clearance during walking (p < 0.01) than the Ctrl group, which could lead to reduced effectiveness of the reactive response when encountered with a novel slip. However, there was no difference in the reactive MOS, limb support, and falls between the control group and the slip and trip training groups on their respective opposing novel perturbation post-training (MOS, limb support, and falls for novel slip: Tt = Ctrl; for the novel trip: St = Ctrl, both p > 0.05). Current findings suggested that, although perturbation training results in proactive adjustments that could worsen the reactive response (interference) when exposed to an unexpected opposing perturbation, older adults demonstrated the ability to immediately generalize the training-induced adaptive reactive control to maintain MOS, to preserve limb support control, and to reduce fall risk.

Keywords: SLIP; TRIP; contextual interference; fall; perturbation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Bhatt, Wang, Wang and Kannan.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The research design for the hypothesis and the planned comparisons were performed. Post-training walking trials (PW) were compared to examine interferences of training adaptations on the responses to opposing perturbations in the proactive control. Post-training perturbation trials were studied to investigate interferences of training adaptations on the responses to opposing perturbations in the reactive control. R = randomized assignment of subjects among groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A). The experimental setup of the over-ground walkway, the overhead harness, and the motion system. (B-1) to (B-5) Still images indicate the instance of right foot touchdown (RTD) before the slip onset to recovery left foot touchdown (LTD). (C-1) to (C-5). Still images indicate the instance of RTD before left foot hitting the obstacle to recovery foot touchdown.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The training protocol used for the study. The slip-training (St) group received 24 repetitive slip perturbations, the trip-training (Tt) group received 24 repetitive trip perturbations, and the control (Ctrl) group received no training but only walking trials (W). Specifically, after 25–35 unperturbed normal walking trials (W) received by all groups, Group St received a block of eight repeated slip trials (S1–S8), followed by three unperturbed trials, another block of eight slip trials (S9–S16), an additional three unperturbed trials, and a final block of 15 mixed trials (including eight slip and seven unperturbed trials) (S17–S24). Group Tt experienced trials in the same design as Group St but trips as perturbation (T). Group Ctrl experienced an additional 37 unperturbed walking trials. After a 30-min break, all groups received three unperturbed post-perturbation walking trials (PW). Then, Group St received a reslip followed by a novel trip, Group Tt received a retrip followed by a novel slip, and Group Ctrl experienced these two perturbations in random order.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A,B) The proactive adaptation and the short-term (30-min) retention in the margin of stability (MOS) during slip perturbation (indicated by filled circles) and trip perturbation (indicated by filled triangle) trainings. (C,D) The reactive adaptation and the short-term (30-min) retention in MOS during slip perturbation (indicated by filled circles) and trip perturbation (indicated by filled triangle) trainings. S1, S8, and S24 indicated the 1st, 8th, and the 24th slips, respectively, during the slip-training session. Reslip indicated the retest slip after a 30-min break. T1, T8, and T24 indicated the 1st, 8th, and 24th trips, respectively, during the trip-training session. Retrip indicated the retest trip after a 30min break. The mean value of MOS and the positive value of standard deviation for each trial are displayed. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Fall outcomes among the reslip trial in the St group, the novel slip trial in the Tt group, and the novel slip trial in the Ctrl group. Significant differences were shown as the top two lines. Fall outcomes among the retrip trial inTt and the novel trip trial in St and in Ctrl. Significant differences were shown in the middle two lines. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Proactive adjustments among PW in the St group, the Tt group, and the Ctrl group in a) the MOS at the RTD, (B) the step length normalized by body height (BH), and (C) the toe clearance normalized by BH. The mean value of MOS, step length, and toe clearance and the positive value of SD for each variable in each trial are displayed. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(A) Reactive MOS at the recovery LTD among the reslip trial in the St group and the novel slip trials in the Tt group and in the Ctrl group (indicated by filled circles). Significant differences are shown as the bottom two lines. The reactive MOS at the recovery LTD among the retrip trial in the Tt group and the novel trip trials in St and in Ctrl groups (indicated by triangles). Significant differences are shown in the top two lines. (B) Limb support (represented by the minimum hip height normalized by BH) among the reslip trial in the St group () and novel slip trials in the Tt group and in the Ctrl group (indicated by filled circles). Significant differences are shown in the top two lines. Limb support among the retrip trial in the Tt group and the novel trip trial in St and in Ctrl groups (indicated by triangles). The vertical line indicates the significant differences between the novel slip and the novel trip of the Ctrl group. The oblique line indicates the significant differences between the novel trip in the St group and the novel slip in the Tt group. The mean value of MOS and limb support and the positive value of the SD for each variable in each trial are displayed. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

References

    1. Antes D. L., d'Orsi E., Benedetti T. R. B. (2013). Circumstances and consequences of falls among the older adults in Florianopolis. Epi Floripa Aging 2009. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiol. 16, 469–81. 10.1590/S1415-790X2013000200021
    1. Arantes P. M., Dias JMD, Fonseca F. F., Oliveira A., Oliveira M. C., Pereira L. S., et al. . (2015). Effect of a program based on balance exercises on gait, functional mobility, fear of falling, and falls in Prefrail older women. Top. Geriatr. Rehabil. 31, 113–120. 10.1097/TGR.0000000000000056
    1. Benjamini Y., Yekutieli D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Statist. 2001, 1165–1188. 10.1214/aos/1013699998
    1. Bhatt T., Pai Y. (2009). Generalization of gait adaptation for fall prevention: from moveable platform to slippery floor. J. Neurophysiol. 101, 948–957. 10.1152/jn.91004.2008
    1. Bhatt T., Wang E., Pai Y-C. (2006a). Retention of adaptive control over varying intervals: prevention of slip-induced backward balance loss during gait. J. Neurophysiol. 95, 2913–2922. 10.1152/jn.01211.2005
    1. Bhatt T., Wang T-Y, Yang, F., Pai Y-C. (2013). Adaptation and generalization to opposing perturbations in walking. Neuroscience 246, 435–450. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.04.013
    1. Bhatt T., Wening J., Pai Y-C. (2006b). Adaptive control of gait stability in reducing slip-related backward loss of balance. Exp. Brain Res. 170, 61–73. 10.1007/s00221-005-0189-5
    1. Bhatt T., Yang F., Pai Y-C. (2012). Learning to resist gait-slip falls: long-term retention in community-dwelling older adults. Archiv. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93, 557–564. 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.027
    1. Clemson L., Singh MAF, Bundy A., Cumming R. G., Manollaras K., O'Loughlin P., et al. . (2012). Integration of balance and strength training into daily life activity to reduce rate of falls in older people (the LiFE study): randomised parallel trial. BMJ 345:e4547. 10.1136/bmj.e4547
    1. Davidson P. R., Wolpert D. M. (2003). Motor learning and prediction in a variable environment. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 232–237. 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00038-2
    1. Espy D. D., Yang F., Bhatt T., Pai Y-C. (2010). Independent influence of gait speed and step length on stability and fall risk. Gait Posture 32, 378–382. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.013
    1. Grabiner M. D., Crenshaw J. R., Hurt C. P., Rosenblatt N. J., Troy K. L. (2014). Exercise-based fall prevention: can you be a bit more specific? Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 42, 161–168. 10.1249/JES.0000000000000023
    1. Hamacher D., Hamacher D., Schega L. (2014). Towards the importance of minimum toe clearance in level ground walking in a healthy elderly population. Gait Posture 40, 727–729. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.07.016
    1. Hof A., Gazendam M., Sinke W. (2005). The condition for dynamic stability. J. Biomech. 38, 1–8. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.025
    1. Hopewell S., Adedire O., Copsey B. J., Boniface G. J., Sherrington C., Clemson L., et al. . (2018). Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Datab. System. Rev. 2018:CD012221. 10.1002/14651858.CD012221.pub2
    1. Kumar S., Fernando D., Veves A., Knowles E., Young M., Boulton A. (1991). Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: a simple, effective and inexpensive screening device for identifying diabetic patients at risk of foot ulceration. Diabet. Res. Clin. Pract. 13, 63–67. 10.1016/0168-8227(91)90034-B
    1. Lam T., Dietz V. (2004). Transfer of motor performance in an obstacle avoidance task to different walking conditions. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 2010–2016. 10.1152/jn.00397.2004
    1. Luukinen H., Herala M., Koski K., Honkanen R., Laippala P., Kivelä S-L. (2000). Fracture risk associated with a fall according to type of fall among the elderly. Osteoporosis Int. 11, 631–634. 10.1007/s001980070086
    1. Mansfield A., Peters A. L., Liu B. A., Maki B. E. (2010). Effect of a perturbation-based balance training program on compensatory stepping and grasping reactions in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Phys. Therapy 90, 476–491. 10.2522/ptj.20090070
    1. Mansfield A., Wong J. S., Bryce J., Knorr S., Patterson K. K. (2015). Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls? Systematic review and meta-analysis of preliminary randomized controlled trials. Phys. Therapy 95, 700–709. 10.2522/ptj.20140090
    1. Mf F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12, 189–198.
    1. Milat A. J., Watson W. L., Monger C., Barr M., Giffin M., Reid M. (2011). Prevalence, circumstances and consequences of falls among community-dwelling older people: results of the 2009 NSW Falls Prevention Baseline Survey. NSW Public Health Bullet. 22, 43–48. 10.1071/NB10065
    1. Morley J. E. (2002). A fall is a major event in the life of an older person. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 57, M492–M495. 10.1093/gerona/57.8.M492
    1. Morton S. M., Bastian A. J. (2004a). Cerebellar control of balance and locomotion. Neuroscientist 10, 247–259. 10.1177/1073858404263517
    1. Morton S. M., Bastian A. J. (2004b). Prism adaptation during walking generalizes to reaching and requires the cerebellum. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 2497–2509. 10.1152/jn.00129.2004
    1. Morton S. M., Lang C. E., Bastian A. J. (2001). Inter-and intra-limb generalization of adaptation during catching. Exp. Brain Res. 141, 438–445. 10.1007/s002210100889
    1. Okubo Y., Brodie M. A., Sturnieks D. L., Hicks C., Carter H., Toson B., et al. . (2018). Exposure to trips and slips with increasing unpredictability while walking can improve balance recovery responses with minimum predictive gait alterations. PLoS ONE 13:e0202913. 10.1371/journal.pone.0202913
    1. Pai Y-C, Bhatt, T., Wang E., Espy D., Pavol M. J. (2010). Inoculation against falls: rapid adaptation by young and older adults to slips during daily activities. Archiv. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 91, 452–459. 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.032
    1. Pai Y-C, Bhatt, T., Yang F., Wang E., Kritchevsky S. (2014). Perturbation training can reduce community-dwelling older adults' annual fall risk: a randomized controlled trial. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med. Sci. 69, 1586–1594. 10.1093/gerona/glu087
    1. Pai Y-C, Wening, J., Runtz E., Iqbal K., Pavol M. (2003). Role of feedforward control of movement stability in reducing slip-related balance loss and falls among older adults. J. Neurophysiol. 90, 755–762. 10.1152/jn.01118.2002
    1. Pai Y-C, Yang, F., Wening J. D., Pavol M. J. (2006). Mechanisms of limb collapse following a slip among young and older adults. J. Biomech. 39, 2194–2204. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.004
    1. Pai Y-C., Bhatt T. S. (2007). Repeated-slip training: an emerging paradigm for prevention of slip-related falls among older adults. Phys. Therapy 87, 1478–1491. 10.2522/ptj.20060326
    1. Paillard T., Noé F. (2020). Does monopedal postural balance differ between the dominant leg and the non-dominant leg? A review. Hum. Mov. Sci. 74:102686. 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102686
    1. Parkkari J., Kannus P., Palvanen M., Natri A., Vainio J., Aho H., et al. . (1999). Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients. Calcified Tissue Int. 65, 183–187. 10.1007/s002239900679
    1. Patel P., Bhatt T. (2015). Adaptation to large-magnitude treadmill-based perturbations: improvements in reactive balance response. Physiol. Rep. 3:e12247. 10.14814/phy2.12247
    1. Pavol M. J., Owings T. M., Foley K. T., Grabiner M. D. (2001). Mechanisms leading to a fall from an induced trip in healthy older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 56, M428–M437. 10.1093/gerona/56.7.M428
    1. Pijnappels M., Bobbert M. F., van Dieën J. H. (2004). Contribution of the support limb in control of angular momentum after tripping. J. Biomech. 37, 1811–1818. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.038
    1. Pijnappels M., Bobbert M. F., van Dieën J. H. (2005). How early reactions in the support limb contribute to balance recovery after tripping. J. Biomech. 38, 627–634. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.029
    1. Podsiadlo D., Richardson S. (1991). The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 39, 142–148. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
    1. Rubenstein L. Z., Josephson K. R., Robbins A. S. (1994). Falls in the nursing home. Ann. Intern. Med. 121, 442–451. 10.7326/0003-4819-121-6-199409150-00009
    1. Scheidt R. A., Dingwell J. B., Mussa-Ivaldi F. A. (2001). Learning to move amid uncertainty. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 971–985. 10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.971
    1. Seidler R., Noll D., Thiers G. (2004). Feedforward and feedback processes in motor control. Neuroimage 22, 1775–1783. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.003
    1. Sherrington C., Fairhall N. J., Wallbank G. K., Tiedemann A., Michaleff Z. A., Howard K., et al. . (2019). Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Datab. System. Rev. 2019:CD012424. 10.1002/14651858.CD012424.pub2
    1. Smeesters C., Hayes W. C., McMahon T. A. (2001). Disturbance type and gait speed affect fall direction and impact location. J. Biomech. 34, 309–317. 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00200-1
    1. Spaniolas K., Cheng J. D., Gestring M. L., Sangosanya A., Stassen N. A., Bankey P. E. (2010). Ground level falls are associated with significant mortality in elderly patients. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 69, 821–825. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181efc6c6
    1. Talbot L. A., Musiol R. J., Witham E. K., Metter E. J. (2005). Falls in young, middle-aged and older community dwelling adults: perceived cause, environmental factors and injury. BMC Public Health. 5, 1–9. 10.1186/1471-2458-5-86
    1. Thompson P. W., Taylor J., Oliver R., Fisher A. (1998). Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel predicts wrist and osteoporosis-related fractures in women age 45–75 years. J. Clin. Densitomet. 1, 219–225. 10.1385/JCD:1:3:219
    1. Tinetti M. E., Williams T. F., Mayewski R. (1986). Fall risk index for elderly patients based on number of chronic disabilities. Am. J. Med. 80, 429–434. 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90717-5
    1. Towne S. D., Jr., Ory M. G., Smith M. L. (2014). Cost of fall-related hospitalizations among older adults: environmental comparisons from the 2011 Texas hospital inpatient discharge data. Popul. Health Manag. 17, 351–356. 10.1089/pop.2014.0002
    1. Troy K. L., Donovan S. J., Grabiner M. D. (2009). Theoretical contribution of the upper extremities to reducing trunk extension following a laboratory-induced slip. J. Biomech. 42, 1339–1344. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.004
    1. Vetter P., Wolpert D. M. (2000). Context estimation for sensorimotor control. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 1026–1034. 10.1152/jn.2000.84.2.1026
    1. Wang S., Pai Y-C., Bhatt T. (2020). Is there an optimal recovery step landing zone against slip-induced backward falls during walking? Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 1–11. 10.1007/s10439-020-02482-4
    1. Wang T., Dordevic G. S., Shadmehr R. (2001). Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses. Biol. Cybernet. 85, 437–448. 10.1007/s004220100277
    1. Wang T-Y, Bhatt, T., Yang F., Pai Y-C. (2012). Adaptive control reduces trip-induced forward gait instability among young adults. J. Biomech. 45, 1169–1175. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.001
    1. Wang Y., Wang S., Bolton R., Kaur T., Bhatt T. (2019). Effects of task-specific obstacle-induced trip-perturbation training: proactive and reactive adaptation to reduce fall-risk in community-dwelling older adults. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2019, 1–13. 10.1007/s40520-019-01268-6
    1. Witney A. G., Vetter P., Wolpert D. M. (2001). The influence of previous experience on predictive motor control. Neuroreport 12, 649–653. 10.1097/00001756-200103260-00007
    1. Wolpert D. M., Ghahramani Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1212–1217. 10.1038/81497
    1. Wu G., Keyes L., Callas P., Ren X., Bookchin B. (2010). Comparison of telecommunication, community, and home-based Tai Chi exercise programs on compliance and effectiveness in elders at risk for falls. Archiv. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 91, 849–856. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.024
    1. Yang F., Bhatt T., Pai Y-C. (2009). Role of stability and limb support in recovery against a fall following a novel slip induced in different daily activities. J. Biomech. 42, 1903–1908. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.009
    1. Yang F., Bhatt T., Pai Y-C. (2013). Generalization of treadmill-slip training to prevent a fall following a sudden (novel) slip in over-ground walking. J. Biomech. 46, 63–69. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.10.002
    1. Yang F., Pai Y-C. (2010). Role of individual lower limb joints in reactive stability control following a novel slip in gait. J. Biomech. 43, 397–404. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.003
    1. Yang F., Pai Y-C. (2011). Automatic recognition of falls in gait-slip training: harness load cell based criteria. J. Biomech. 44, 2243–2249. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.05.039

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere