Patient- and provider-reported information about transplantation and subsequent waitlisting

Megan L Salter, Babak Orandi, Mara A McAdams-DeMarco, Andrew Law, Lucy A Meoni, Bernard G Jaar, Stephen M Sozio, Wen Hong Linda Kao, Rulan S Parekh, Dorry L Segev, Megan L Salter, Babak Orandi, Mara A McAdams-DeMarco, Andrew Law, Lucy A Meoni, Bernard G Jaar, Stephen M Sozio, Wen Hong Linda Kao, Rulan S Parekh, Dorry L Segev

Abstract

Because informed consent requires discussion of alternative treatments, proper consent for dialysis should incorporate discussion about other renal replacement options including kidney transplantation (KT). Accordingly, dialysis providers are required to indicate KT provision of information (KTPI) on CMS Form-2728; however, provider-reported KTPI does not necessarily imply adequate provision of information. Furthermore, the effect of KTPI on pursuit of KT remains unclear. We compared provider-reported KTPI (Form-2728) with patient-reported KTPI (in-person survey of whether a nephrologist or dialysis staff had discussed KT) in a prospective ancillary study of 388 hemodialysis initiates. KTPI was reported by both patient and provider for 56.2% of participants, by provider only for 27.8%, by patient only for 8.3%, and by neither for 7.7%. Among participants with provider-reported KTPI, older age was associated with lack of patient-reported KTPI. Linkage with the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients showed that 20.9% of participants were subsequently listed for KT. Patient-reported KTPI was independently associated with a 2.95-fold (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.54 to 5.66; P=0.001) higher likelihood of KT listing, whereas provider-reported KTPI was not associated with listing (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.60 to 2.32; P=0.62). Our findings suggest that patient perception of KTPI is more important for KT listing than provider-reported KTPI. Patient-reported and provider-reported KTPI should be collected for quality assessment in dialysis centers because factors associated with discordance between these metrics might inform interventions to improve this process.

Keywords: CMS Form 2728; age disparities; listing; provision of information; transplantation.

Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Listing for KT, by patient and provider report of provision of information. Estimated cumulative incidence of listing for KT by provider or patient report of provision of information. Curves are estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The log-rank test for difference by provision of information and the log-rank test for trend across age groups are statistically significant (P<0.001). Entry (time zero) is the date of dialysis initiation. Participants are censored at time of listing for KT, death, or end of study.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere