A Community-Based Intervention Program to Enhance Family Communication and Family Well-being: The Learning Families Project in Hong Kong

Chen Shen, Alice Wan, Lit Tung Kwok, Sally Pang, Xin Wang, Sunita M Stewart, Tai Hing Lam, Sophia Siu Chee Chan, Chen Shen, Alice Wan, Lit Tung Kwok, Sally Pang, Xin Wang, Sunita M Stewart, Tai Hing Lam, Sophia Siu Chee Chan

Abstract

Background: Family communication is important to maintain family relationships and family well-being. To enhance family communication and family well-being, a community-based "Learning Families Project," based on the social ecological model was developed in Kwun Tong in Hong Kong, a district with high prevalence of family problems.

Methods: This quasi-experimental study included two nearby government subsidized low-rent housing estates separated by busy main roads, as the intervention [Tsui Ping (South) Estate] and control (Shun Tin Estate) estate. The main intervention was resident training programs, such as talks, day camps, and thematic activities. No program was implemented in the control estate. Participants in the intervention group received assessments before the intervention (T1), immediately after the intervention (T2), and 6 weeks after the intervention (T3). Control group participants were assessed at baseline (March to April 2011) and follow-up (December 2011 to March 2012). Assessments of family communication (time and perceived adequacy) and family well-being (harmony, happiness, and health) at T1 and T3 were obtained in the intervention group to examine within-group changes. In addition, these differences in outcomes in the intervention group were compared with those in the control group to examine the effectiveness of the intervention.

Results: Family communication time and perceived communication adequacy increased significantly in the intervention group (n = 515) with a small effect size (Cohen effect d: 0.10 and 0.24, respectively). Compared with the control group (n = 476), the improvements in family communication time and perceived communication adequacy (Cohen effect d: 0.13 and 0.14, respectively), and perceived family harmony and happiness (Cohen effect d: 0.12 and 0.12, respectively) were significantly greater in the intervention group, adjusting for age and education, suggesting the intervention was effective in improving family communication and family well-being. Mediation analysis showed that perceived communication adequacy mediated the effects of the intervention on family harmony [β = 0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03, 0.18], happiness (β = 0.12, 95% CI 0.04, 0.20), and health (β = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02, 0.17), adjusting for age and education.

Conclusion: This community intervention based on the social ecological model improved family well-being through improving family communication, which could be an effective target to promote family well-being in other communities.

Trial registration: This study was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02851667. URL: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02851667?term=02851667&rank=1.

Keywords: community engagement; community-based intervention; family; mediation analysis; social ecological model.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pathway of intervention on outcomes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The flow diagram of participants in the intervention group.

References

    1. Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging (2000) 15(2):187.10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187
    1. Mason MJ, Schmidt C, Abraham A, Walker L, Tercyak K. Adolescents’ social environment and depression: social networks, extracurricular activity, and family relationship influences. J Clin Psychol Med Settings (2009) 16(4):346–54.10.1007/s10880-009-9169-4
    1. Milevsky A, Schlechter M, Netter S, Keehn D. Maternal and paternal parenting styles in adolescents: associations with self-esteem, depression and life-satisfaction. J Child Fam Stud (2007) 16(1):39–47.10.1007/s10826-006-9066-5
    1. Wickrama K, Lorenz FO, Wallace LE, Peiris L, Conger RD, Elder GH. Family influence on physical health during the middle years: the case of onset of hypertension. J Marriage Fam (2001) 63(2):527–39.10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00527.x
    1. Meireles AL, Xavier CC, de Souza Andrade AC, Proietti FA, Caiaffa WT. Self-rated health among urban adolescents: the roles of age, gender, and their associated factors. PLoS One (2015) 10(7):e0132254.10.1371/journal.pone.0132254
    1. Hwang K-K. Knowledge and Action: A Social-Psychological Interpretation of Chinese Cultural Tradition. Taipei: Sin-Li; (1995).
    1. Kwan VS, Bond MH, Singelis TM. Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol (1997) 73(5):1038.10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.1038
    1. Chuang YC. Effects of interaction pattern on family harmony and well-being: test of interpersonal theory, relational-models theory, and Confucian ethics. Asian J Soc Psychol (2005) 8(3):272–91.10.1111/j.1467-839X.2005.00174.x
    1. Chan SS, Viswanath K, Au DW, Ma CM, Lam WW, Fielding R, et al. Hong Kong Chinese community leaders’ perspectives on family health, happiness and harmony: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res (2011) 26(4):664–74.10.1093/her/cyr026
    1. Lam WW, Fielding R, McDowell I, Johnston J, Chan S, Leung GM, et al. Perspectives on family health, happiness and harmony (3H) among Hong Kong Chinese people: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res (2012) 27(5):767–79.10.1093/her/cys087
    1. Pearson JC. Communication in the Family: Seeking Satisfaction in Changing Times. London, UK: Pearson College Division; (1993).
    1. Galvin KM, Tullos JM. Family Communication: Cohesion and Change. Will County, IL: Governors State University; (1986).
    1. Olson DH. Circumplex model of marital and family systems. J Fam Ther (2000) 22(2):144–67.10.1111/1467-6427.00144
    1. Karakas F, Dean Lee M, MacDermid SM. A qualitative investigation into the meaning of family well-being from the perspective of part-time professionals. Equal Oppor Int (2004) 23(1/2):57–77.10.1108/02610150410787855
    1. Yum JO. The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Commun Monogr (1988) 55(4):374–88.10.1080/03637758809376178
    1. Chang H-C. Harmony as performance: the turbulence under Chinese interpersonal communication. Discourse Stud (2001) 3(2):155–79.10.1177/1461445601003002001
    1. Hong Kong Social Welfare Department. Statistics on Elder Abuse Cases (2016). Available from:
    1. Hong Kong Social Welfare Department. Statistics on Child Abuse, Spouse/Cohabitant Battering and Sex Violences Cases (2016). Available from:
    1. Leung GM, Ni MY, Wong PT, Lee PH, Chan BH, Stewart SM, et al. Cohort profile: FAMILY cohort. Int J Epidemiol (2017) 46(2):e1.10.1093/ije/dyu257
    1. Fabrizio CS, Lam TH, Hirschmann MR, Pang I, Yu NX, Wang X, et al. Parental emotional management benefits family relationships: a randomized controlled trial in Hong Kong, China. Behav Res Ther (2015) 71:115–24.10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.011
    1. Yu X, Stewart SM, Chui JP, Ho JL, Li AC, Lam TH. A pilot randomized controlled trial to decrease adaptation difficulties in Chinese new immigrants to Hong Kong. Behav Ther (2014) 45(1):137–52.10.1016/j.beth.2013.10.003
    1. Li WH, Mak YW, Chan SS, Chu AK, Lee EY, Lam TH. Effectiveness of a play-integrated primary one preparatory programme to enhance a smooth transition for children. J Health Psychol (2013) 18(1):10–25.10.1177/1359105311434052
    1. Soong CS, Wang MP, Mui M, Viswanath K, Lam TH, Chan SS. A “community fit” community-based participatory research program for family health, happiness, and harmony: design and implementation. JMIR Res Protoc (2015) 4(4):e126.10.2196/resprot.4369
    1. Stewart SM, Fabrizio CS, Hirschmann MR, Lam TH. Developing community-based preventive interventions in Hong Kong: a description of the first phase of the family project. BMC Public Health (2012) 12:106.10.1186/1471-2458-12-106
    1. McLaren L, Hawe P. Ecological perspectives in health research. J Epidemiol Community Health (2005) 59(1):6–14.10.1136/jech.2003.018044
    1. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (Vol. 4). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; (2008). p. 465–86.
    1. Powell E, Woodfield LA, Nevill AM. Increasing physical activity levels in primary school physical education: the SHARP principles model. Prev Med Rep (2016) 3:7–13.10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.11.007
    1. Peterson KE, Sorensen G, Pearson M, Hebert JR, Gottlieb BR, McCormick MC. Design of an intervention addressing multiple levels of influence on dietary and activity patterns of low-income, postpartum women. Health Educ Res (2002) 17(5):531–40.10.1093/her/17.5.531
    1. Fabrizio CS, Stewart SM, Ip AK, Lam TH. Enhancing the parent–child relationship: a Hong Kong community-based randomized controlled trial. J Fam Psychol (2014) 28(1):42.10.1037/a0035275
    1. Ho HC, Mui M, Wan A, Ng YL, Stewart SM, Yew C, et al. Happy family kitchen II: a cluster randomized controlled trial of a community-based family intervention for enhancing family communication and well-being in Hong Kong. Front Psychol (2016) 7:638.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00638
    1. Babcock JC, Waltz J, Jacobson NS, Gottman JM. Power and violence: the relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. J Consult Clin Psychol (1993) 61(1):40.10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.40
    1. Papp LM, Kouros CD, Cummings EM. Demand-withdraw patterns in marital conflict in the home. Pers Relatsh (2009) 16(2):285–300.10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01223.x
    1. Sanavi FS, Baghbanian A, Shovey MF, Ansari-Moghaddam A. A study on family communication pattern and parenting styles with quality of life in adolescent. J Pak Med Assoc (2013) 63(11):1393–8.
    1. Wang MP, Chu JT, Viswanath K, Wan A, Lam TH, Chan SS. Using information and communication technologies for family communication and its association with family well-being in Hong Kong: FAMILY project. J Med Internet Res (2015) 17(8):e207.10.2196/jmir.4722
    1. MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol (2007) 58:593–614.10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
    1. Introduction of Christian Family Service Centre (2017). Available from:
    1. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull (1992) 112(1):155.10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
    1. Schafer JL. Multiple imputation: a primer. Stat Methods Med Res (1999) 8(1):3–15.10.1177/096228029900800102
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol (2006) 3(2):77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Koerner AF, Fitzpatrick MA. Toward a theory of family communication. Commun Theory (2002) 12(1):70–91.10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00260.x
    1. Samek DR, Rueter MA. Associations between family communication patterns, sibling closeness, and adoptive status. J Marriage Fam (2011) 73(5):1015–31.10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00865.x
    1. Sillars A, Canary DJ, Tafoya M. Communication, conflict, and the quality of family relationships. In: Vangelisti AL, editor. Handbook of Family Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; (2004). p. 413–46.
    1. Olson DH, Dreman S. Family stress and coping: a multisystem perspective. In: Dreman S, editor. The Family on the Threshold of the 21st Century: Trends and Implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; (1997). p. 259–80.
    1. DeLambo KE, Ievers-Landis CE, Drotar D, Quittner AL. Association of observed family relationship quality and problem-solving skills with treatment adherence in older children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Psychol (2004) 29(5):343–53.10.1093/jpepsy/jsh038
    1. Bakir A, Rose GM, Shoham A. Family communication patterns: mothers’ and fathers’ communication style and children’s perceived influence in family decision making. J Int Consum Mark (2006) 19(2):75–95.10.1300/J046v19n02_05
    1. Lau S, Lew WJ, Hau K-T, Cheung PC, Berndt TJ. Relations among perceived parental control, warmth, indulgence, and family harmony of Chinese in mainland China. Dev Psychol (1990) 26(4):674.10.1037/0012-1649.26.4.674

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere