COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics

Michaël Schwarzinger, Verity Watson, Pierre Arwidson, François Alla, Stéphane Luchini, Michaël Schwarzinger, Verity Watson, Pierre Arwidson, François Alla, Stéphane Luchini

Abstract

Background: Opinion polls on vaccination intentions suggest that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is increasing worldwide; however, the usefulness of opinion polls to prepare mass vaccination campaigns for specific new vaccines and to estimate acceptance in a country's population is limited. We therefore aimed to assess the effects of vaccine characteristics, information on herd immunity, and general practitioner (GP) recommendation on vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France.

Methods: In this survey experiment, adults aged 18-64 years residing in France, with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, were randomly selected from an online survey research panel in July, 2020, stratified by gender, age, education, household size, and region and area of residence to be representative of the French population. Participants completed an online questionnaire on their background and vaccination behaviour-related variables (including past vaccine compliance, risk factors for severe COVID-19, and COVID-19 perceptions and experience), and were then randomly assigned according to a full factorial design to one of three groups to receive differing information on herd immunity (>50% of adults aged 18-64 years must be immunised [either by vaccination or infection]; >50% of adults must be immunised [either by vaccination or infection]; or no information on herd immunity) and to one of two groups regarding GP recommendation of vaccination (GP recommends vaccination or expresses no opinion). Participants then completed a series of eight discrete choice tasks designed to assess vaccine acceptance or refusal based on hypothetical vaccine characteristics (efficacy [50%, 80%, 90%, or 100%], risk of serious side-effects [1 in 10 000 or 1 in 100 000], location of manufacture [EU, USA, or China], and place of administration [GP practice, local pharmacy, or mass vaccination centre]). Responses were analysed with a two-part model to disentangle outright vaccine refusal (irrespective of vaccine characteristics, defined as opting for no vaccination in all eight tasks) from vaccine hesitancy (acceptance depending on vaccine characteristics).

Findings: Survey responses were collected from 1942 working-age adults, of whom 560 (28·8%) opted for no vaccination in all eight tasks (outright vaccine refusal) and 1382 (71·2%) did not. In our model, outright vaccine refusal and vaccine hesitancy were both significantly associated with female gender, age (with an inverted U-shaped relationship), lower educational level, poor compliance with recommended vaccinations in the past, and no report of specified chronic conditions (ie, no hypertension [for vaccine hesitancy] or no chronic conditions other than hypertension [for outright vaccine refusal]). Outright vaccine refusal was also associated with a lower perceived severity of COVID-19, whereas vaccine hesitancy was lower when herd immunity benefits were communicated and in working versus non-working individuals, and those with experience of COVID-19 (had symptoms or knew someone with COVID-19). For a mass vaccination campaign involving mass vaccination centres and communication of herd immunity benefits, our model predicted outright vaccine refusal in 29·4% (95% CI 28·6-30·2) of the French working-age population. Predicted hesitancy was highest for vaccines manufactured in China with 50% efficacy and a 1 in 10 000 risk of serious side-effects (vaccine acceptance 27·4% [26·8-28·0]), and lowest for a vaccine manufactured in the EU with 90% efficacy and a 1 in 100 000 risk of serious side-effects (vaccine acceptance 61·3% [60·5-62·1]).

Interpretation: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance depends on the characteristics of new vaccines and the national vaccination strategy, among various other factors, in the working-age population in France.

Funding: French Public Health Agency (Santé Publique France).

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance predicted in the French working-age population depending on vaccine efficacy, vaccine safety, and location of vaccine manufacturer The probability of vaccine hesitancy in each scenario was calculated by deduction of the probabilities of outright refusal of vaccination and vaccine acceptance from 100%; appendix p 12).
Figure 2
Figure 2
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance predicted in the French working-age population depending on age group, vaccine efficacy, vaccine safety, and location of vaccine manufacturer The probability of vaccine hesitancy in each scenario was calculated by deduction of the probabilities of outright refusal of vaccination and vaccine acceptance from 100%; appendix p 12).

References

    1. Flaxman S, Mishra S, Gandy A. Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe. Nature. 2020;584:257–261.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Weekly COVID-19 country overview.
    1. Verity R, Okell LC, Dorigatti I. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:669–677.
    1. Salje H, Tran Kiem C, Lefrancq N. Estimating the burden of SARS-CoV-2 in France. Science. 2020;369:208–211.
    1. Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature. 2020;584:430–436.
    1. Hogan AB, Winskill P, Watson OJ. Imperial College London; London: 2020. Report 33: modelling the allocation and impact of a COVID-19 vaccine.
    1. Carrat F, de Lamballerie X, Rahib D. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among adults in three regions of France following the lockdown and associated risk factors: a multicohort study. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.09.16.20195693. published online Sept 18. (preprint).
    1. Saad-Roy CM, Wagner CE, Baker RE. Immune life history, vaccination, and the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 over the next 5 years. Science. 2020;370:811–818.
    1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2603–2615.
    1. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2035389. published online Dec 30.
    1. WHO Draft landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines.
    1. Lin C, Tu P, Beitsch LM. Confidence and receptivity for COVID-19 vaccines: a rapid systematic review. Vaccines (Basel) 2020;9:e16.
    1. Lazarus JV, Ratzan SC, Palayew A. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat Med. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9. published online Oct 20.
    1. Ward JK, Alleaume C, Peretti-Watel P. The French public's attitudes to a future COVID-19 vaccine: the politicization of a public health issue. Soc Sci Med. 2020;265
    1. Hacquin A-S, Altay S, de Araujo E, Chevallier C, Mercier H. Sharp rise in vaccine hesitancy in a large and representative sample of the French population: reasons for vaccine hesitancy. PsyArXiv. 2020 doi: 10.31234/. published online Nov 17. (preprint, version 2)
    1. Roozenbeek J, Schneider CR, Dryhurst S. Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. R Soc Open Sci. 2020;7
    1. Kreps S, Prasad S, Brownstein JS. Factors associated with US adults' likelihood of accepting COVID-19 vaccination. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3
    1. Schwarzinger M, Flicoteaux R, Cortarenoda S, Obadia Y, Moatti JP. Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance? PLoS One. 2010;5
    1. MacDonald NE. Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015;33:4161–4164.
    1. Johnson NF, Velásquez N, Restrepo NJ. The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views. Nature. 2020;582:230–233.
    1. Mereckiene J, Cotter S, Weber JT. Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination policies and coverage in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2012;17
    1. Verger P, Fressard L, Cortaredona S. Trends in seasonal influenza vaccine coverage of target groups in France, 2006/07 to 2015/16: impact of recommendations and 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. Euro Surveill. 2018;23
    1. Haute Autorité de Santé Stratégie de vaccination contre le SARS-CoV-2—recommandations préliminaires sur la stratégie de priorisation des populations à vacciner. Nov 27, 2020.
    1. Betsch C, Böhm R, Korn L, Holtmann C. On the benefits of explaining herd immunity in vaccine advocacy. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:0056.
    1. Hauber AB, Gonzalez JM, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG. Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016;19:300–315.
    1. Hodgson SH, Mansatta K, Mallett G, Harris V, Emary KRW, Pollard AJ. What defines an efficacious COVID-19 vaccine? A review of the challenges assessing the clinical efficacy of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30773-8. published online Oct 27.
    1. de Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA. Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. Patient. 2015;8:373–384.
    1. von Haefen RH, Massey DM, Adamowicz WL. Serial nonparticipation in repeated discrete choice models. Am J Agric Econ. 2005;87:1061–1076.
    1. Bish A, Yardley L, Nicoll A, Michie S. Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2011;29:6472–6484.
    1. Rhodes A, Hoq M, Measey MA, Danchin M. Intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 in Australia. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30724-6. published online Sept 14.
    1. Larson HJ, de Figueiredo A, Xiahong Z. The state of vaccine confidence 2016: global insights through a 67-country survey. EBioMedicine. 2016;12:295–301.
    1. Santé publique France COVID-19 : point épidémiologique du 26 novembre 2020.
    1. Ladenburg J, Olsen SB. Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys. Resour Energy Econ. 2014;37:39–63.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere