Pelvic radiography in ATLS algorithms: A diminishing role?

Matthias P Hilty, Isabelle Behrendt, Lorin M Benneker, Luca Martinolli, Christoforos Stoupis, Donald J Buggy, Heinz Zimmermann, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos, Matthias P Hilty, Isabelle Behrendt, Lorin M Benneker, Luca Martinolli, Christoforos Stoupis, Donald J Buggy, Heinz Zimmermann, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos

Abstract

Background: Pelvic x-ray is a routine part of the primary survey of polytraumatized patients according to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines. However, pelvic CT is the gold standard imaging technique in the diagnosis of pelvic fractures. This study was conducted to confirm the safety of a modified ATLS algorithm omitting pelvic x-ray in hemodynamically stable polytraumatized patients with clinically stable pelvis in favour of later pelvic examination by CT scan.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all polytraumatized patients in our emergency room between 01.07.2004 and 31.01.2006. Inclusion criteria were blunt abdominal trauma, initial hemodynamic stability and a stable pelvis on clinical examination. We excluded patients requiring immediate intervention because of hemodynamic instability.

Results: We reviewed the records of n = 452 polytraumatized patients, of which n = 91 fulfilled inclusion criteria (56% male, mean age = 45 years). The mechanism of trauma included 43% road traffic accidents, 47% falls. In 68/91 (75%) patients, both a pelvic x-ray and a CT examination were performed; the remainder had only pelvic CT. In 6/68 (9%) patients, pelvic fracture was diagnosed by pelvic x-ray. None of these 6 patients was found having a false positive pelvic x-ray, i.e. there was no fracture on pelvic CT scan. In 3/68 (4%) cases a fracture was missed in the pelvic x-ray, but confirmed on CT (false negative on x-ray). None of the diagnosed fractures needed an immediate therapeutic intervention. 5 (56%) were classified type A fractures, and another 4 (44%) B 2.1 in computed tomography (AO classification). One A 2.1 fracture was found in a clinically stable patient who only received CT scan (1/23).

Conclusion: While pelvic x-ray is an integral part of ATLS assessment, this retrospective study suggests that in hemodynamically stable patients with clinically stable pevis, its sensitivity is only 67% and it may safely be omitted in favor of a pelvic CT examination if such is planned in adjunct assessment and available. The results support the safety and utility of our modified ATLS algorithm. A randomized controlled trial using the algorithm can safely be conducted to confirm the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Management algorithm focusing on pelvic fractures. PXR: Pelvic x-ray; * see definition under "Methods"

References

    1. Hammel J, Legome E. Pelvic fracture. J Emerg Med. 2006;30:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.09.001.
    1. Muller EJ, Siebenrock K, Ekkernkamp A, Ganz R, Muhr G. Ipsilateral fractures of the pelvis and the femur – floating hip? A retrospective analysis of 42 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999;119:179–182. doi: 10.1007/s004020050385.
    1. Demetriades D, Karaiskakis M, Toutouzas K, Alo K, Velmahos G, Chan L. Pelvic fractures: epidemiology and predictors of associated abdominal injuries and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:1–10. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01197-3.
    1. Velmahos GC, Jindal A, Chan LS, Murray JA, Vassiliu P, Berne TV, Asensio J, Demetriades D. "Insignificant" mechanism of injury: not to be taken lightly. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:147–152. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00790-0.
    1. Young JW, Burgess AR, Brumback RJ, Poka A. Pelvic fractures: value of plain radiography in early assessment and management. Radiology. 1986;160:445–451.
    1. Miller MT, Pasquale MD, Bromberg WJ, Wasser TE, Cox J. Not so FAST. J Trauma. 2003;54:52–59.
    1. Guillamondegui OD, Pryor JP, Gracias VH, Gupta R, Reilly PM, Schwab CW. Pelvic radiography in blunt trauma resuscitation: a diminishing role. J Trauma. 2002;53:1043–1047.
    1. Vo NJ, Gash J, Browning J, Hutson RK. Pelvic imaging in the stable trauma patient: is the AP pelvic radiograph necessary when abdominopelvic CT shows no acute injury? Emerg Radiol. 2004;10:246–249. doi: 10.1007/s10140-004-0341-8.
    1. Guillamondegui OD, Mahboubi S, Stafford PW, Nance ML. The utility of the pelvic radiograph in the assessment of pediatric pelvic fractures. J Trauma. 2003;55:236–239.
    1. Isler B, Ganz R. Classification of pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 1996;27:S–12. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(96)83788-0.
    1. Tile M. Fractures of the pelvis and Acetabulum: principles of management. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.
    1. Jurik AG, Jensen LC, Hansen J. Total effective radiation dose from spiral CT and conventional radiography of the pelvis with regard to fracture classification. Acta Radiol. 1996;37:651–654.
    1. Rommens P, Wissing H, Serdarevic M. [Significance of computerized tomography in the diagnosis and therapy of fractures of the posterior pelvic ring and hip joint] Unfallchirurgie. 1987;13:32–37. doi: 10.1007/BF02585829.
    1. Dunn EL, Berry PH, Connally JD. Computed tomography of the pelvis in patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma. 1983;23:378–383.
    1. Obaid AK, Barleben A, Porral D, Lush S, Cinat M. Utility of plain film pelvic radiographs in blunt trauma patients in the emergency department. Am Surg. 2006;72:951–954.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere