In vivo quantification of rolling and adhered leukocytes in human sepsis

Bjorn K Fabian-Jessing, Michael J Massey, Michael R Filbin, Peter C Hou, Henry E Wang, Hans Kirkegaard, Donald M Yealy, William C Aird, John A Kellum, Derek C Angus, Nathan I Shapiro, ProCESS Investigators, Bjorn K Fabian-Jessing, Michael J Massey, Michael R Filbin, Peter C Hou, Henry E Wang, Hans Kirkegaard, Donald M Yealy, William C Aird, John A Kellum, Derek C Angus, Nathan I Shapiro, ProCESS Investigators

Abstract

Background: The use of in vivo videomicroscopy at the bedside has demonstrated microcirculatory flow disturbances in sepsis. The ability of in vivo videomicroscopy to detect changes in the prevalence of rolling and adhered leukocytes that occur in sepsis is not well-described in humans. We sought to (1) develop methodology for accessing and quantifying sublingual leukocyte rolling and adherence with sidestream dark field (SDF) imaging; (2) compare the number of rolling and adhered leukocytes between patients with septic shock and non-infected controls; and (3) compare the number of rolling and adhered leukocytes between survivors and non-survivors of septic shock.

Methods: We included adult (age > 18 years) patients in the emergency department presenting with septic shock prospectively enrolled in the ProCESS trial. We recruited comparison non-infected patients as emergency department controls. Using a SDF videomicroscope, we obtained image sequences from the sublingual mucosa, quantifying rolling and adhered leukocytes per 1 mm × 1 mm visual field in a standardized 3-s clip. We report data as median and interquartile range and depicted as box plots. We compared groups using the Mann-Whitney U test, considering a p value < 0.05 significant.

Results: We included a total of 64 patients with septic shock and 32 non-infected controls. The median number of adhered leukocytes per field in the sepsis group was 1.0 (IQR 0-3.5) compared to 0 (0-0) in the non-infected group (p < 0.001). The median number of rolling leukocytes was 26 (10.3-42) in the sepsis group and 9.8 (4.8-17.3) in the non-infected group (p < 0.001) per field. Among the patients with sepsis (n = 64), there was an increased number of adhered leukocytes in non-survivors compared to survivors (3.0 (1-5.5) vs. 1.0 (0-3.0)) (p < 0.05); however, there was no difference in rolling leukocytes (35 (20-48) vs. 26 (10-41)) (p = 0.31).

Conclusions: Our results demonstrated a higher number of rolling and adhered leukocytes in patients with septic shock when compared to non-infected controls, and an increased number of adhered leukocytes in non-survivors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00793442 ; Registered on 19 November 2008 PG0GM076659 (US NIH Grant/Contract). First submitted 18 July 2007. First posted 2 August 2007.

Keywords: Leukocyte; Microcirculation; SDF; Sepsis; Septic shock; Sidestream dark field.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Committee for Clinical Investigations and each site’s review board approved the design. Each subject or legal representative gave written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

NIS received funding from the National Institutes of Health; research funding from Cheetah Medical, Thermo-Fisher, Siemens, and Rapid Pathogen Screening. He was on an advisory board/consultant for Baxter and Cyon. The MicroScan equipment was provided by MicroVision Medical BV.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The figure shows the same vessel visualized by sidestream dark field imaging at different time points. The black arrows show rolling leukocytes with a shift towards the right throughout the time course. The red arrow shows an adhered leukocyte
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of adhered leukocytes in patients with sepsis and in controls. The boxes delineate the interquartile range, the median is shown as a line in the middle of the box, and tails show the 95% range; ***p < 0.001
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of rolling leukocytes in patients with sepsis and in controls. The boxes delineate the interquartile range, the median is shown as a line in the middle of the box, and tails show the 95% range; ***p < 0.001
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of adhered leukocytes in survivors and non-survivors in the sepsis group. The boxes delineate the interquartile range, the median is shown as a line in the middle of the box, and tails show the 95% range; *p < 0.05
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of rolling leukocytes in survivors and non-survivors in the sepsis group. The boxes delineate the interquartile range, the median is shown as a line in the middle of the box, and tails show the 95% range. The groups were not significantly different, p = 0.31

References

    1. Peters K, Unger RE, Brunner J, Kirkpatrick CJ. Molecular basis of endothelial dysfunction in sepsis. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;60(1):49–57. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(03)00397-3.
    1. Granger DN, Kubes P. The microcirculation and inflammation: modulation of leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion. J Leukoc Biol. 1994;55(5):662–675. doi: 10.1002/jlb.55.5.662.
    1. Croner RS, Hoerer E, Kulu Y, Hackert T, Gebhard MM, Herfarth C, Klar E. Hepatic platelet and leukocyte adherence during endotoxemia. Critical care. 2006;10(1):R15. doi: 10.1186/cc3968.
    1. Farquhar I, Martin CM, Lam C, Potter R, Ellis CG, Sibbald WJ. Decreased capillary density in vivo in bowel mucosa of rats with normotensive sepsis. J Surg Res. 1996;61(1):190–196. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1996.0103.
    1. Al-Banna NA, Pavlovic D, Bac VH, Utpatel K, Janke E, Rippke JN, Borowiak M, Cerny V, Spassov A, Johnston B, et al. Acute administration of antibiotics modulates intestinal capillary perfusion and leukocyte adherence during experimental sepsis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013;41(6):536–543. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.02.024.
    1. De Backer D, Creteur J, Preiser JC, Dubois MJ, Vincent JL. Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):98–104. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200109-016OC.
    1. Sakr Y, Dubois MJ, De Backer D, Creteur J, Vincent JL. Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(9):1825–1831. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000138558.16257.3F.
    1. Arnold RC, Dellinger RP, Parrillo JE, Chansky ME, Lotano VE, McCoy JV, Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Hollenberg SM, Trzeciak S. Discordance between microcirculatory alterations and arterial pressure in patients with hemodynamic instability. J Crit Care. 2012;27(5):e531.e1–e531.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.02.007.
    1. Ince C. Hemodynamic coherence and the rationale for monitoring the microcirculation. Crit Care. 2015;19(Suppl 3):S8.
    1. Bauer A, Demetz F, Hoeper I, Thiel M, Chouker A, Christ F. Microvascular perfusion measured by orthogonal polarization spectral imaging is well maintained during exposure to high altitude in trained mountaineers. Eur J Med Res. 2008;13(12):568–575.
    1. Bauer A, Kofler S, Thiel M, Eifert S, Christ F. Monitoring of the sublingual microcirculation in cardiac surgery using orthogonal polarization spectral imaging: preliminary results. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(6):939–945. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000291442.69337.c9.
    1. Donati A, Damiani E, Domizi R, Romano R, Adrario E, Pelaia P, Ince C, Singer M. Alteration of the sublingual microvascular glycocalyx in critically ill patients. Microvasc Res. 2013;90:86–89. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2013.08.007.
    1. Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, Barnato AE, Weissfeld LA, Pike F, Terndrup T, Wang HE, Hou PC, LoVecchio F, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1683–1693. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602.
    1. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, Cohen J, Opal SM, Vincent JL, Ramsay G. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international Sepsis definitions conference. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(4):530–538. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1662-x.
    1. De Backer D, Hollenberg S, Boerma C, Goedhart P, Buchele G, Ospina-Tascon G, Dobbe I, Ince C. How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference. Crit Care. 2007;11(5):R101. doi: 10.1186/cc6118.
    1. Massey MJ, Larochelle E, Najarro G, Karmacharla A, Arnold R, Trzeciak S, Angus DC, Shapiro NI. The microcirculation image quality score: development and preliminary evaluation of a proposed approach to grading quality of image acquisition for bedside videomicroscopy. J Crit Care. 2013;28(6):913–917. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.06.015.
    1. Alahi A, Ortiz R, Vandergheynst P. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Providence: Ieee; 2012. FREAK: fast retina Keypoint.
    1. Frangi A, Niessen W, Vincken K, Viergever M. Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. In: Wells W, Colchester A, Delp S, editors. Medical image computing and computer-assisted interventation — MICCAI’98 vol 1496. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1998. pp. 130–137.
    1. Zuiderveld Karel. Graphics Gems. 1994. Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization; pp. 474–485.
    1. O'Neil MP, Fleming JC, Badhwar A, Guo LR. Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass: microcirculatory and systemic effects. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(6):2046–2053. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.065.
    1. Nakagawa NK, Nogueira RA, Correia CJ, Shiwa SR, Costa Cruz JW, Poli de Figueiredo LF, Rocha ESM, Sannomiya P. Leukocyte-endothelium interactions after hemorrhagic shock/reperfusion and cecal ligation/puncture: an intravital microscopic study in rat mesentery. Shock. 2006;26(2):180–186. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000223133.10254.82.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere