The incidence of pregnancy hypertension in India, Pakistan, Mozambique, and Nigeria: A prospective population-level analysis

Laura A Magee, Sumedha Sharma, Hannah L Nathan, Olalekan O Adetoro, Mrutynjaya B Bellad, Shivaprasad Goudar, Salécio E Macuacua, Ashalata Mallapur, Rahat Qureshi, Esperança Sevene, John Sotunsa, Anifa Valá, Tang Lee, Beth A Payne, Marianne Vidler, Andrew H Shennan, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Peter von Dadelszen, CLIP Study Group, Jeffrey Bone, Jing Li, Domena K Tu, Laura A Magee, Sumedha Sharma, Hannah L Nathan, Olalekan O Adetoro, Mrutynjaya B Bellad, Shivaprasad Goudar, Salécio E Macuacua, Ashalata Mallapur, Rahat Qureshi, Esperança Sevene, John Sotunsa, Anifa Valá, Tang Lee, Beth A Payne, Marianne Vidler, Andrew H Shennan, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Peter von Dadelszen, CLIP Study Group, Jeffrey Bone, Jing Li, Domena K Tu

Abstract

Background: Most pregnancy hypertension estimates in less-developed countries are from cross-sectional hospital surveys and are considered overestimates. We estimated population-based rates by standardised methods in 27 intervention clusters of the Community-Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) cluster randomised trials.

Methods and findings: CLIP-eligible pregnant women identified in their homes or local primary health centres (2013-2017). Included here are women who had delivered by trial end and received a visit from a community health worker trained to provide supplementary hypertension-oriented care, including standardised blood pressure (BP) measurement. Hypertension (BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg) was defined as chronic (first detected at <20 weeks gestation) or gestational (≥20 weeks); pre-eclampsia was gestational hypertension plus proteinuria or a pre-eclampsia-defining complication. A multi-level regression model compared hypertension rates and types between countries (p < 0.05 considered significant). In 28,420 pregnancies studied, women were usually young (median age 23-28 years), parous (53.7%-77.3%), with singletons (≥97.5%), and enrolled at a median gestational age of 10.4 (India) to 25.9 weeks (Mozambique). Basic education varied (22.8% in Pakistan to 57.9% in India). Pregnancy hypertension incidence was lower in Pakistan (9.3%) than India (10.3%), Mozambique (10.9%), or Nigeria (10.2%) (p = 0.001). Most hypertension was diastolic only (46.4% in India, 72.7% in Pakistan, 61.3% in Mozambique, and 63.3% in Nigeria). At first presentation with elevated BP, gestational hypertension was most common diagnosis (particularly in Mozambique [8.4%] versus India [6.9%], Pakistan [6.5%], and Nigeria [7.1%]; p < 0.001), followed by pre-eclampsia (India [3.8%], Nigeria [3.0%], Pakistan [2.4%], and Mozambique [2.3%]; p < 0.001) and chronic hypertension (especially in Mozambique [2.5%] and Nigeria [2.8%], compared with India [1.2%] and Pakistan [1.5%]; p < 0.001). Inclusion of additional diagnoses of hypertension and related complications, from household surveys or facility record review (unavailable in Nigeria), revealed higher hypertension incidence: 14.0% in India, 11.6% in Pakistan, and 16.8% in Mozambique; eclampsia was rare (<0.5%).

Conclusions: Pregnancy hypertension is common in less-developed settings. Most women in this study presented with gestational hypertension amenable to surveillance and timed delivery to improve outcomes.

Trial registration: This study is a secondary analysis of a clinical trial - ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT01911494.

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: ZAB is a member of the Editorial Board of PLOS Medicine.

Figures

Fig 1. Pregnancies enrolled and included in…
Fig 1. Pregnancies enrolled and included in the study.
POM, Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of Risk on the Move.

References

    1. United Nations. About the Sustainable Development Goals. New York: United Nations; 2018 [cited 2018 Apr 1] .
    1. Graham W, Woodd S, Byass P, Filippi V, Gon G, Virgo S, et al. Diversity and divergence: the dynamic burden of poor maternal health. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2164–75.
    1. Kassebaum NJ, Betrozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;284(9947):980–1004.
    1. Payne BA, Hanson C, Sharma S, Magee LA, von Dadelszen P. Epidemiology of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy In: Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Stones W, Mathai M, editors. The FIGO textbook of pregnancy hypertension. London: Global Library of Women’s Medicine; 2016
    1. Sebastian T, Yadav B, Jeyasaleen L, Vijayaselvi E, Jose R. Small for gestational age births among South Indian women: temporal trend and risk factors from 1996 to 2010. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:7 10.1186/s12884-015-0440-4
    1. Adane AA, Ayele TA, Arasa LG, Bitew BD, Zeleke BM. Adverse birth outcomes among deliveries at Gondar University Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):90.
    1. Baragou S, Goeh-Akue E, Pio M, Afassinou YM, Atta B. [Hypertension and pregnancy in Lome (sub-Saharan Africa): epidemiology, diagnosis and risk factors]. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2014;63(3):145–50. 10.1016/j.ancard.2014.05.006
    1. Olusanya BO, Solanke OA. Perinatal outcomes associated with maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a developing country. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2012;31(1):120–13.
    1. Berhe AK, Kassa GM, Fekadu GA, Muche AA. Prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:34 10.1186/s12884-018-1667-7
    1. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Measure DHS/ICF International. Moçambique Inquérito Demográfico e de Saúde 2011. Calverton (MD): Measure DHS/ICF International; 2013 [cited 2018 Feb 16].
    1. International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2017 [cited 2018 Feb 16]. .
    1. Abalos E, Cuesta C, Carroli G, Qureshi Z, Widmer M, Vodel JP, et al. Pre-eclampsia, eclampsia and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. BJOG. 2014;121(S1):14–24.
    1. Abalos E, Cuesa C, Grosso AL, Chou D, Say L. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J of Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):1–7.
    1. Perveen S. Frequency and impact of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26(4):518–21.
    1. Janakarim P, Mohanrak U, Rajadurai R. Maternal and foetal outcomes in gestational hypertension. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017;4(68):4041–5.
    1. Olayemi O, Strobino D, Aimakhu C, Adedapo K, Kehinde A, Odukogbe A, et al. Influence of duration of sexual cohabitation on the risk of hypertension in nulliparous parturients in Ibadan: a cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50:40–4. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01115.x
    1. Familoni OB, Adefuye PO, Olunuga TO. Pattern and factors affecting the outcome of pregnancy in hypertensive patients. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004;96:1626–31.
    1. Payne B, von Dadelszen P, Bhutta Z, Magee L, Adetoro O, Sotunsa J, et al. Protocol 13PRT/9313: the Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) Trials: four prospective cluster randomised controlled trials comparing a package of interventions directed towards improving maternal and perinatal outcomes related to pre-eclampsia with current standards of care (NCT01911494). Lancet. 2018. [cited 2018 Feb 16]. Available from: .
    1. Dunsmuir DT, Payne BA, Cloete G, Petersen CL, Gorges M, Lim J, et al. Development of mHealth applications for pre-eclampsia triage. IEEE J Biomed Health. 2014;18(6):1857–64.
    1. Payne BA, Hutcheon JA, Ansermino JM, Hall DR, Bhutta ZA, Bhutta SZ, et al. A risk prediction model for the assessment and triage of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in low-resourced settings: the miniPIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) multi-country prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2014;11(1):e1001589 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001589
    1. Lim J, Cloete G, Dunsmuir DT, Payne BA, Scheffer C, von Dadelszen P, et al. Usability and feasibility of PIERS on the Move: An mHealth app for pre-eclampsia triage. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(2):e37 10.2196/mhealth.3942
    1. Payne BA, Hutcheon JA, Dunsmuir D, Cloete G, Dumont G, Hall D, et al. Assessing the incremental value of blood oxygen saturation (SpO 2) in the miniPIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) risk prediction model. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(1):16–24.
    1. Nathan HL, de Greeff A, Hezelgrave NL, Chappell LC, Shennan AH. An accurate semiautomated oscillometric blood pressure device for use in pregnancy (including pre-eclampsia) in a low-income and middle-income country population: the Microlife 3AS1-2. Blood Press Monit. 2015;20(1):52–5. 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000086
    1. Daskalopoulou SS, Khan NA, Quinn RR, Ruzicka M, McKay DW, Hackman DG, et al. The 2012 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, and therapy. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28(3):270–87.
    1. Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, Karumanchi SA, McCarthy FP, Saito S, et al. The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;13:291–310. 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.05.004
    1. Goudar SS, Carlo WA, McClure EM, Pasha O, Patel A, Esamai F, et al. The Maternal and Newborn Health Registry Study of the Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118(3):190–3. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.04.022
    1. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2019 Mar 22]. ].
    1. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013 [cited 2019 Mar 22]. .
    1. Oladapo OT, Adetoro OO, Ekele BA, Chama C, Etuk SJ, Aboyeji AP, et al. When getting there is not enough: a nationwide cross-sectional study of 998 maternal deaths and 1451 near-misses in public tertiary hospitals in a low-income country. BJOG. 2016;123(6):928–38. 10.1111/1471-0528.13450
    1. Gillon TER, Pels A, von Dadelszen P, MacDonell K, Magee LA. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e113715 10.1371/journal.pone.0113715
    1. Franklin SS, Wong ND. Hypertension and cardiovascular disease: contributions of the Framingham Heart Study. Glob Heart. 2013;8(1):49–57. 10.1016/j.gheart.2012.12.004
    1. Sharma KJ, Kilpatrik S. Postpartum hypertension: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017;72(4):248–52. 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000424
    1. Sibai BM. Etiology and management of postpartum hypertension-preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(6):470–5.
    1. Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Rey E, Ross S, Asztalos E, Murphy KE, et al. Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(5):407–17. 10.1056/NEJMoa1404595

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere