Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Jan Bredow, Johannes Oppermann, Katharina Hoffmann, Martin Hellmich, Birte Wenk, Marvin Simons, Peer Eysel, Kourosh Zarghooni, Jan Bredow, Johannes Oppermann, Katharina Hoffmann, Martin Hellmich, Birte Wenk, Marvin Simons, Peer Eysel, Kourosh Zarghooni

Abstract

Background: Postoperative wound infection is a preventable risk. One potential postoperative complication is blistering, which leads to increased pain, delayed healing, and higher care costs. The incidence of wound blisters has been reported to be between 6 and 24%. The aim of this study is to assess whether the risks of postoperative blistering and wound infections within the first 6 days postsurgery will be reduced using a special dressing compared to a standard one.

Methods/design: This is a randomized clinical trial in a University hospital. Patients presenting for knee or hip arthroplasty or spine procedures will be assessed against study inclusion and exclusion criteria. After giving written informed consent, patients will be randomized to participate in the 7-day study during hospitalization. One hundred patients will be randomized per group. The primary outcome measure is blistering incidence from day 0 to day 6 postsurgery. Photo documentation will be evaluated in a blinded manner by the Clinical Evaluation Committee (CEC).

Discussion: A new dressing will be compared to the standard wound dressing regarding the risk of postoperative blistering, wound infection, and patient comfort. This study will assess the potential advantages of a modern wound dressing.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01988818 (Entered 13 November 2011).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the progression through the randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic surgery.

References

    1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
    1. Otten R, van Roermund PM, Picavet HS. Trends in the number of knee and hip arthroplasties: considerably more knee and hip prostheses due to osteoarthritis in 2030. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A1534.
    1. Singh JA, Vessely MB, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Melton LJ, 3rd, Kurland RL, et al. A population-based study of trends in the use of total hip and total knee arthroplasty, 1969–2008. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:898–904. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0115.
    1. Cosker T, Elsayed S, Gupta S, Mendonca AD, Tayton KJ. Choice of dressing has a major impact on blistering and healing outcomes in orthopaedic patients. J Wound Care. 2005;14:27–9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2005.14.1.26722.
    1. Castelo-Branco C, Pons F, Gratacos E, Fortuny A, Vanrell JA, Gonzalez-Merlo J. Relationship between skin collagen and bone changes during aging. Maturitas. 1994;18:199–206. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(94)90126-0.
    1. Koval KJ, Egol KA, Polatsch DB, Baskies MA, Homman JP, Hiebert RN. Tape blisters following hip surgery. A prospective, randomized study of two types of tape. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1884–7.
    1. Ousey K, Gillibrand W, Stephenson J. Achieving international consensus for the prevention of orthopaedic wound blistering: results of a Delphi survey. Int Wound J. 2013;10:177–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00965.x.
    1. Tustanowski J. Effect of dressing choice on outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty: a literature review. J Wound Care. 2009;18:449–50. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.11.44985.
    1. Pelet SCM, Denault A, Provost J. Reduction of tape blisters after hip surgery- a prospective evaluation of three kinds of bandges. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2012; 94-B: no. SUPP XXXVIII 164.
    1. Burke NG, Green C, McHugh G, McGolderick N, Kilcoyne C, Kenny P. A prospective randomised study comparing the jubilee dressing method to a standard adhesive dressing for total hip and knee replacements. J Tissue Viability. 2012;21(3):84–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2012.04.002.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere