Diabetes and baseline glucose are associated with inflammation, left ventricular function and short- and long-term outcome in acute coronary syndromes: role of the novel biomarker Cyr 61

Patric Winzap, Allan Davies, Roland Klingenberg, Slayman Obeid, Marco Roffi, François Mach, Lorenz Räber, Stephan Windecker, Christian Templin, Fabian Nietlispach, David Nanchen, Baris Gencer, Olivier Muller, Christian M Matter, Arnold von Eckardstein, Thomas F Lüscher, Patric Winzap, Allan Davies, Roland Klingenberg, Slayman Obeid, Marco Roffi, François Mach, Lorenz Räber, Stephan Windecker, Christian Templin, Fabian Nietlispach, David Nanchen, Baris Gencer, Olivier Muller, Christian M Matter, Arnold von Eckardstein, Thomas F Lüscher

Abstract

Background: Hyperglycemia in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) impacts short term outcomes, but little is known about longer term effects. We therefore designed this study to firstly determine the association between hyperglycemia and short term and longer term outcomes in patients presenting with ACS and secondly evaluate the prognostic role of diabetes, body mass index (BMI) and the novel biomarker Cyr61 on outcomes.

Methods: The prospective Special Program University Medicine-Acute Coronary Syndrome (SPUM-ACS) cohort enrolled 2168 patients with ACS between December 2009 and October 2012, of which 2034 underwent PCI (93.8%). Patients were followed up for 12 months. Events were independently adjudicated by three experienced cardiologists. Participants were recruited from four tertiary hospitals in Switzerland: Zurich, Geneva, Lausanne and Bern. Participants presenting with acute coronary syndromes and who underwent coronary angiography were included in the analysis. Patients were grouped according to history of diabetes (or HbA1c greater than 6%), baseline blood sugar level (BSL; < 6, 6-11.1 and > 11.1 mmol/L) and body mass index (BMI). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) which was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke and all-cause death. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary endpoint, revascularisations, bleeding events (BARC classification) and cerebrovascular events (ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke or TIA).

Results: Patients with hyperglycemia, i.e. BSL ≥ 11.1 mmol/L, had higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), creatinine kinase (CK), higher heart rates and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and increased N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. At 30 days and 12 months, those with BSL ≥ 11.1 mmol/L had more MACE and death compared to those with BSL < 6.0 mmol/L or 6.0-11.1 mmol/L (HR-ratio 4.78 and 6.6; p < 0.001). The novel biomarker Cyr61 strongly associated with high BSL and STEMI and was independently associated with 1 year outcomes (HR 2.22; 95% CI 1.33-3.72; Tertile 3 vs. Tertile 1).

Conclusions and relevance: In this large, prospective, independently adjudicated cohort of in all comers ACS patients undergoing PCI, both a history of diabetes and elevated entry glucose was associated with inflammation and increased risk of MACE both at short and long-term. The mediators might involve increased sympathetic activation, inflammation and ischemia as reflected by elevated Cyr61 levels leading to larger levels of troponin and lower LVEF. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT01000701. Registered October 23, 2009.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndromes; Diabetes; Glucose; Inflammation; Major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; Mortality.

Conflict of interest statement

MR has received institutional research grants from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Terumo, Medtronic, and Biotronik; RK has received advisory board fees from Novartis; FM has received research grants to the institution from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronic, MSD, Eli Lilly and St. Jude Medical including speaker or consultant fees; LR received speaker fees and research grants to the institution from St. Jude Medical; SW has received research grants to the institution from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biosensors, Biotronik, the Medicines Company, Medtronic and St. Jude Medical and honoraria from Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Boston Scientific, Biosensors, Biotronik, Medtronic and Edwards; FN is serving as a consultant for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic; AvE received speaker or consultant fees from Amgen, MSD, and Sanofi-Aventis; TFL received research grants to the institution from AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, MSD, Merck, Roche and Servier, including speaker fees by some of them. CMM received research grants to the institution from Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Roche, Amgen and MSD including speaker or consultant fees.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Box plots of selected variables and biomarkers according to glucose level at baseline. Differences between groups analysed using either ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Kaplan–Meier curves of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in diabetics versus non-diabetics in the first 30 days. b Landmark survival curves (30 days to 1 year) of major adverse cardiovascular events in diabetics versus non-diabetics
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Kaplan–Meier survival curves of mortality in diabetics versus non-diabetics in the first 30 days. b Landmark survival analysis using Kaplan–Meier survival curves to assess mortality in diabetics versus non-diabetics from 30 to 365 days
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Kaplan–Meier curves of MACE in ACS patients within 30 days according to plasma glucose levels on presentation. b Landmark survival analysis using Kaplan–Meier survival curves comparing outcomes from 30 days to 1 year according to plasma glucose levels on presentation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Box plot demonstrating change in Cyr61 levels as glucose increases, stratified by infarct type (STEMI vs. NSTEMI/UA)

References

    1. McAloon CJ, Boylan LM, Hamborg T, et al. The changing face of cardiovascular disease 2000–2012: an analysis of the world health organisation global health estimates data. Int J Cardiol. 2016;224:256–264. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.026.
    1. Adams ML, Grandpre J, Katz DL, Shenson D. The impact of key modifiable risk factors on leading chronic conditions. Prev Med. 2019;120:113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.006.
    1. Bornfeldt KE, Tabas I. Insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and atherosclerosis. Cell Metab. 2011;14(5):575–585. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.07.015.
    1. Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;128:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024.
    1. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzen S, et al. Mortality and cardiovascular disease in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1407–1418. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1608664.
    1. Li W, Katzmarzyk PT, Horswell R, et al. Body mass index and stroke risk among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Stroke. 2015;46(1):164–169. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006718.
    1. Zhao W, Katzmarzyk PT, Horswell R, et al. Body mass index and the risk of all-cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2014;130(24):2143–2151. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009098.
    1. Jae SY, Franklin BA, Choo J, et al. Fitness, body habitus, and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in korean men. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(4):585–589. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.11.046.
    1. Atique SM, Shadbolt B, Marley P, Farshid A. Association between body mass index and age of presentation with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39(11):653–657. doi: 10.1002/clc.22576.
    1. Labounty TM, Gomez MJ, Achenbach S, et al. Body mass index and the prevalence, severity, and risk of coronary artery disease: an international multicentre study of 13,874 patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14(5):456–463. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes179.
    1. Hoebers LP, Damman P, Claessen BE, et al. Predictive value of plasma glucose level on admission for short and long term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(1):53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.067.
    1. Timmer JR, Hoekstra M, Nijsten MW, et al. Prognostic value of admission glycosylated hemoglobin and glucose in nondiabetic patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2011;124(6):704–711. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.985911.
    1. Vis MM, Sjauw KD, van der Schaaf RJ, et al. In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, admission glucose level is a strong independent predictor for 1-year mortality in patients without a prior diagnosis of diabetes. Am Heart J. 2007;154(6):1184–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.028.
    1. Klingenberg R, Aghlmandi S, Liebetrau C, et al. Cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (Cyr61): a novel soluble biomarker of acute myocardial injury improves risk stratification after acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(47):3493–3502. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx640.
    1. Chamberlain JJ, Rhinehart AS, Shaefer CF, Jr, Neuman A. Diagnosis and management of diabetes: synopsis of the 2016 American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(8):542–552. doi: 10.7326/M15-3016.
    1. Hao Y, Lu Q, Li T, et al. Admission hyperglycemia and adverse outcomes in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0441-x.
    1. Gencer B, Rigamonti F, Nanchen D, et al. Prognostic values of fasting hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018:2048872618777819.
    1. Takahashi H, Iwahashi N, Kirigaya J, et al. Glycemic variability determined with a continuous glucose monitoring system can predict prognosis after acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0761-5.
    1. Orbach A, Halon DA, Jaffe R, et al. Impact of diabetes and early revascularization on the need for late and repeat procedures. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0669-0.
    1. Sacca L, Vigorito C, Cicala M, Corso G, Sherwin RS. Role of gluconeogenesis in epinephrine-stimulated hepatic glucose production in humans. Am J Physiol. 1983;245(3):E294–E302.
    1. Grassi G, Seravalle G, Mancia G. Sympathetic activation in cardiovascular disease: evidence, clinical impact and therapeutic implications. Eur J Clin Investig. 2015;45(12):1367–1375. doi: 10.1111/eci.12553.
    1. Jaskiewicz F, Supel K, Koniarek W, Zielinska M. Admission hyperglycemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock. Cardiol J. 2015;22(3):290–295. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0087.
    1. Norhammar A, Mellbin L, Cosentino F. Diabetes: prevalence, prognosis and management of a potent cardiovascular risk factor. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(3_suppl):52–60. doi: 10.1177/2047487317709554.
    1. Ebert TJ, Novalija J, Barney JA, et al. Moderate, short-term, local hyperglycemia attenuates forearm endothelium-dependent vasodilation after transient ischemia-reperfusion in human volunteers. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31(5):1649–1655. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.11.040.
    1. Johnstone MT, Creager SJ, Scales KM, et al. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 1993;88(6):2510–2516. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.88.6.2510.
    1. Ferroni P, Basili S, Falco A, Davi G. Platelet activation in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(8):1282–1291. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00836.x.
    1. Sumaya W, Wallentin L, James SK, et al. Fibrin clot properties independently predict adverse clinical outcome following acute coronary syndrome: a PLATO substudy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(13):1078–1085. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy013.
    1. You JJ, Yang CH, Chen MS, Yang CM. Cysteine-rich 61, a member of the CCN family, as a factor involved in the pathogenesis of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(7):3447–3455. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2603.
    1. Kim KH, Won JH, Cheng N, Lau LF. The matricellular protein CCN1 in tissue injury repair. J Cell Commun Signal. 2018;12(1):273–279. doi: 10.1007/s12079-018-0450-x.
    1. Deng J, Qian X, Li J, et al. Evaluation of serum cysteine-rich protein 61 levels in patients with coronary artery disease. Biomark Med. 2018;12(4):329–339. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2017-0390.
    1. Bell JA, Kivimaki M, Hamer M. Metabolically healthy obesity and risk of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Obes Rev. 2014;15(6):504–515. doi: 10.1111/obr.12157.
    1. Ariza-Sole A, Salazar-Mendiguchia J, Lorente V, et al. Body mass index and acute coronary syndromes: paradox or confusion? Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015;4(2):158–164. doi: 10.1177/2048872614534080.
    1. Lambert EA, Straznicky NE, Dixon JB, Lambert GW. Should the sympathetic nervous system be a target to improve cardiometabolic risk in obesity? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015;309(2):H244–H258. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00096.2015.
    1. Zamani P, Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers, death, and recurrent nonfatal coronary events after an acute coronary syndrome in the MIRACL study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(1):e003103. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.003103.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere