Surgical frailty assessment: a missed opportunity

Gilgamesh Eamer, Jennifer A Gibson, Chelsia Gillis, Amy T Hsu, Marian Krawczyk, Emily MacDonald, Reid Whitlock, Rachel G Khadaroo, Gilgamesh Eamer, Jennifer A Gibson, Chelsia Gillis, Amy T Hsu, Marian Krawczyk, Emily MacDonald, Reid Whitlock, Rachel G Khadaroo

Abstract

Background: Preoperative frailty predicts adverse postoperative outcomes. Despite the advantages of incorporating frailty assessment into surgical settings, there is limited research on surgical healthcare professionals' use of frailty assessment for perioperative care.

Methods: Healthcare professionals caring for patients enrolled at a Canadian teaching hospital were surveyed to assess their perceptions of frailty, as well as attitudes towards and practices for frail patients. The survey contained open-ended and 5-point Likert scale questions. Responses were compared across professions using independent sample t-tests and correlations between survey items were analyzed.

Results: Nurses and allied health professionals were more likely than surgeons to think frailty should play a role in planning a patient's care (nurses vs. surgeons p = 0.008, allied health vs. surgeons p = 0.014). Very few respondents (17.5%) reported that they 'always used' a frailty assessment tool. Results from qualitative data analysis identified four main barriers to frailty assessment: institutional, healthcare system, professional knowledge, and patient/family barriers.

Conclusion: Across all disciplines, the lack of knowledge about frailty issues was a prominent barrier to the use of frailty assessments in practice, despite clinicians' understanding that frailty affects their patients' outcomes. Confidence in frailty assessment tool use through education and addressing barriers to implementation may increase use and improve patient care. Healthcare professionals agree that frailty assessments should play a role in perioperative care. However, few perform them in practice. Lack of knowledge about frailty is a key barrier in the use of frailty assessments and the majority of respondents agreed that they would benefit from further training.

Keywords: Frailty; Improving care; Operative screening; Surgery; Survey.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Participation was voluntary and confidential and ethical approval was obtained at the University of Alberta Research Ethics Office (Protocol no. Pro00064524).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;173:489–495. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
    1. Kaethler Y, Molnar F, Mitchell S, Soucie P, Man-Son-Hing M. Defining the concept of frailty: a survey of multi-disciplinary health professionals. Geriatr Today. 2003;6:26–31.
    1. Vermeiren S, Vella-Azzopardi R, Beckwée D, Habbig A-K, Scafoglieri A, Jansen B, et al. Frailty and the Prediction of Negative Health Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:1163–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.010.
    1. Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Hall BL. Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:1009–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.043.
    1. Adams P, Ghanem T, Stachler R, Hall F, Velanovich V, Rubinfeld I, et al. Frailty as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in inpatient head and neck surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2013;139:783–789. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3969.
    1. Velanovich V, Antoine H, Swartz A, Peters D, Rubinfeld I. Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: Its application to a national database. J Surg Res. 2013;183:104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.021.
    1. Li JL, Henderson MA, Revenig LM, Sweeney JF, Kooby DA, Maithel SK, et al. Frailty and one-year mortality in major intra-abdominal operations. J Surg Res. 2016;203:507–512. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.007.
    1. Etzioni DA, Liu JH, Maggard MA, Ko CY. The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce. Ann Surg. 2003;238:170–177.
    1. Harari D, Hopper A, Dhesi J, Babic-Illman G, Lockwood L, Martin F. Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery (‘POPS’): designing, embedding, evaluating and funding a comprehensive geriatric assessment service for older elective surgical patients. Age Ageing. 2007;36:190–196. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl163.
    1. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Wright RJ, Resnick NM. Reducing delirium after hip fracture: A randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:516–522. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49108.x.
    1. O’Toole GC, Abuzukuk T, Murray P. Elective total hip arthroplasty in patients aged 85 years and older. Ir Med J. 2002;95:106–107.
    1. Farhat JS, Velanovich V, Falvo AJ, Horst HM, Swartz A, Patton JH, et al. Are the frail destined to fail? Frailty index as predictor of surgical morbidity and mortality in the elderly. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:1526–1530. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182542fab.
    1. Lees MC, Merani S, Tauh K, Khadaroo RG. Perioperative factors predicting poor outcome in elderly patients following emergency general surgery: a multivariate regression analysis. Can J Surg. 2015;58:312–317. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011614.
    1. Merani S, Payne J, Padwal RS, Hudson D, Widder SL, Khadaroo RG. Predictors of in-hospital mortality and complications in very elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-43.
    1. Leung JM, Dzankic S. Relative importance of preoperative health status versus intraoperative factors in predicting postoperative adverse outcomes in geriatric surgical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1080–1085. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49212.x.
    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146.
    1. Rolfson DB, Majumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT, Tahir A, Rockwood K. Validity and reliability of the edmonton frail scale. Age Ageing. 2006;35:526–529. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl041.
    1. Theou O, Brothers TD, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. operationalization of frailty using eight commonly used scales and comparison of their ability to predict all-cause mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61:1537–1551. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12420.
    1. Ricour C, de Saint-Hubert M, Allepaerts S, Petermans J. Screening for frailty: a benefit for both patients and physicians. Rev Med. 2014;69:239–243.
    1. Prestmo A, Hagen G, Sletvold O, Helbostad JL, Thingstad P, Taraldsen K, et al. Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:1623–1633. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62409-0.
    1. Oresanya LB, Lyons WL, Finlayson E. Preoperative assessment of the older patient. JAMA. 2014;311:2110. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4573.
    1. Ritt M, Schwarz C, Kronawitter V, Delinic A, Bollheimer LC, Gassmann K-G, et al. Analysis of rockwood et al’s clinical frailty scale and fried et al’s frailty phenotype as predictors of mortality and other clinical outcomes in older patients who were admitted to a geriatric ward. J Nutr Health Aging. 2015;19:1043–1048. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0667-9.
    1. Wallis SJ, Wall J, Biram RWS, Romero-Ortuno R. Association of the clinical frailty scale with hospital outcomes. QJM. 2015;108:943–949. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcv066.
    1. Partridge JSL, Collingridge G, Gordon AL, Martin FC, Harari D, Dhesi JK. Where are we in perioperative medicine for older surgical patients? A UK survey of geriatric medicine delivered services in surgery. Age Ageing. 2014;43:721–724. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu084.
    1. Khadaroo RG, Padwal RS, Wagg AS, Clement F, Warkentin LM, Holroyd-Leduc J. Optimizing senior’s surgical care - Elder-friendly Approaches to the Surgical Environment (EASE) study: rationale and objectives. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:338–344. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1001-2.
    1. Willis GB, Artino AR. What do our respondents think we’re asking? Using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:353–356. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00154.1.
    1. Burns KEA, Duffett M, Kho ME, Meade MO, Adhikari NKJ, Sinuff T, et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. Can Med Assoc J. 2008;179:245–252. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080372.
    1. Nicholson C, Gordon AL, Tinker A. Changing the way “we” view and talk about frailty…. Age Ageing. 2016;0:1–3.
    1. Herrmann FR, Osiek A, Cos M, Michel J-P, Robine J-M. Frailty judgment by hospital team members: defree of agreement and survival prediction. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:916–917. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53278_6.x.
    1. Salter ML, Gupta N, Massie AB, Mcadams-Demarco MA, Law AH, Jacob L, et al. Perceived frailty and measured frailty among adults undergoing hemodialysis: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:52–59. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0051-y.
    1. van Kempen JAL, Melis RJF, Perry M, Schers HJ, Rikkert MGMO. Diagnosis of frailty after a comprehensive geriatric assessment: differences between family physicians and geriatricians. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28:240–248. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.02.130081.
    1. Gladman JRF, Conroy SP, Ranhoff AH, Gordon AL. New horizons in the implementation and research of comprehensive geriatric assessment: knowing, doing and the “know-do” gap. Age Ageing. 2016;45:194–200. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw012.
    1. Ijkema R, Langelaan M, van de Steeg L, Wagner C. What impedes and what facilitates a quality. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2014;26:41–48. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt079.
    1. Bergman H, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J, Hogan DB, Hummel S, Karunananthan S, et al. Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigm--issues and controversies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:731–737. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.7.731.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere