Fast-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart in the setting of insulin degludec-treated type 1 diabetes: Efficacy and safety from a randomized double-blind trial

John B Buse, Anders L Carlson, Mitsuhisa Komatsu, Ofri Mosenzon, Ludger Rose, Bo Liang, Kristine Buchholtz, Hiroshi Horio, Takashi Kadowaki, John B Buse, Anders L Carlson, Mitsuhisa Komatsu, Ofri Mosenzon, Ludger Rose, Bo Liang, Kristine Buchholtz, Hiroshi Horio, Takashi Kadowaki

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mealtime or post-meal fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) vs mealtime insulin aspart (IAsp), both in combination with insulin degludec, in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods: This multicentre, treat-to-target trial (Clinical trial registry: NCT02500706, ClinicalTrials.gov) randomized participants to double-blind mealtime faster aspart (n = 342) or IAsp (n = 342) or open-label post-meal faster aspart (n = 341). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c 26 weeks post randomization. All available information, regardless of treatment discontinuation, was used for evaluation of the effect.

Results: Non-inferiority for the change from baseline in HbA1c was confirmed for mealtime and post-meal faster aspart vs IAsp (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: 95%CI, -0.02% [-0.11; 0.07] and 0.10% [0.004; 0.19], respectively). Mealtime faster aspart was superior to IAsp for 1-hour PPG increment using a meal test (ETD, -0.90 mmol/L [-1.36; -0.45]; P < 0.001). Self-monitored 1-hour PPG increment favoured faster aspart at breakfast (ETD, -0.58 mmol/L [-0.99; -0.17]; P = 0.006) and across all meals (-0.48 mmol/L [-0.74; -0.21]; P < 0.001). Safety profiles and overall rate of severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemia were similar between treatments, but significantly less hypoglycaemia was seen 3 to 4 hours after meals with mealtime faster aspart.

Conclusion: Mealtime and post-meal faster aspart in conjunction with insulin degludec provided effective glycaemic control compared with IAsp, with no increased safety risk. Mealtime faster aspart provided PPG control superior to that of IAsp.

Keywords: clinical trial; hypoglycaemia; insulin therapy; type 1 diabetes.

© 2018 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean HbA1c over time. During the run‐in period, observed mean HbA1c was reduced from 8.1% (65 mmol/mol) to 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) in participants subsequently randomized to mealtime faster aspart; from 8.0% (63 mmol/mol) to 7.4% (57 mmol/mol) in those randomized to mealtime insulin aspart; and from 8.1% (65 mmol/mol) to 7.4% (57 mmol/mol) in those randomized to post‐meal faster aspart. At the end of the 26‐week treatment period, mean HbA1c was 7.3% (57 mmol/mol), 7.3% (56 mmol/mol) and 7.4% (57 mmol/mol) in the mealtime faster aspart, mealtime insulin aspart and post‐meal faster aspart arms, respectively. Error bars: ± standard error. All available information, regardless of treatment discontinuation, was used. Abbreviation: Faster aspart, fast‐acting insulin aspart
Figure 2
Figure 2
PPG increment after a standardized meal test at Week 26. A, Mealtime faster aspart at Week 26 vs baseline. B, Post‐meal faster aspart at Week 26 vs baseline. C, Mealtime insulin aspart at Week 26 vs baseline. D, Mealtime faster aspart, post‐meal faster aspart and mealtime insulin aspart at Week 26. *P < 0.001 in favour of mealtime faster aspart vs insulin aspart; †P < 0.001 in favour of insulin aspart vs post‐meal faster aspart. Mealtime insulin aspart administered immediately before the liquid meal; post‐meal faster aspart administered 20 minutes after the start of the liquid meal. Error bars: ± standard error. All available information, regardless of treatment discontinuation, was used. Abbreviations: Faster aspart, fast‐acting insulin aspart; PPG, postprandial glucose

References

    1. Nathan DM. Long‐term complications of diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1676‐1685.
    1. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2643‐2653.
    1. Nathan DM, DCCT/EDIC Research Group . The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: overview. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:9‐16.
    1. American Diabetes Association . 6. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes‐2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(suppl 1):S55‐S64.
    1. Ryden L, Grant PJ, Anker SD, et al. ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre‐diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the task force on diabetes, pre‐diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3035‐3087.
    1. International Diabetes Federation Guideline Development Group . Guideline for management of postmeal glucose in diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103:256‐268.
    1. Maiorino MI, Petrizzo M, Capuano A, Giugliano D, Esposito K. The development of new basal insulins: is there any clinical advantage with their use in type 2 diabetes? Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2014;14:799‐808.
    1. Andersen G, Alluis B, Meiffren G, et al. Ultra‐rapid BioChaperone insulin Lispro (BC‐LIS): linear dose‐response and faster absorption than insulin Lispro (LIS). Diabetologia. 2015;58(suppl 1):S449 (Abstract #931).
    1. Boss AH, Petrucci R, Lorber D. Coverage of prandial insulin requirements by means of an ultra‐rapid‐acting inhaled insulin. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6:773‐779.
    1. Kazda C, Leohr J, Liu R, et al. A novel formulation of insulin lispro containing citrate and treprostinil shows faster absorption and improved postprandial glucose excursions vs Humalog in patients with T1DM. Diabetes. 2017;66(suppl 1):A229‐A398.
    1. Kapitza C, Leohr J, Liu R, et al. A novel formulation of insulin lispro shows significantly faster absorption and improvement in postprandial glucose excursions versus insulin lispro in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2017;60(suppl 1):S1‐S608.
    1. Dodson M, Zhang C, Siesky A, et al. Exploration of the mechanism of accelerated absorption for a novel insulin lispro formulation. Diabetes. 2017;66(suppl 1):A229‐A398.
    1. Heise T, Pieber TR, Danne T, Erichsen L, Haahr H. A pooled analysis of clinical pharmacology trials investigating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of fast‐acting insulin aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56:551‐559.
    1. Russell‐Jones D, Bode BW, De Block C, et al. Fast‐acting insulin aspart improves glycemic control in basal‐bolus treatment for type 1 diabetes: results of a 26‐week multicenter, active‐controlled, treat‐to‐target, randomized, parallel‐group trial (onset 1). Diabetes Care. 2017;40:943‐950.
    1. Mathieu C, Bode BW, Franek E, et al. Efficacy and safety of fast‐acting insulin aspart in comparison with insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes (onset 1): a 52‐week, randomized, treat‐to‐target, phase III trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:1148‐1155.
    1. Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, et al. Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1384‐1395.
    1. Bowering K, Case C, Harvey J, et al. Faster aspart versus insulin aspart as part of a basal‐bolus regimen in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: the onset 2 trial. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:951‐957.
    1. Rodbard HW, Tripathy D, Vidrio Velazquez M, Demissie M, Tamer SC, Piletic M. Adding fast‐acting insulin aspart to basal insulin significantly improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, 18‐week, open‐label, phase 3 trial (onset 3). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:1389‐1396.
    1. Cengiz E. Undeniable need for ultrafast‐acting insulin: the pediatric perspective. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6:797‐801.
    1. Ligthelm RJ, Kaiser M, Vora J, Yale JF. Insulin use in elderly adults: risk of hypoglycemia and strategies for care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:1564‐1570.
    1. Dzygalo K, Golicki D, Kowalska A, Szypowska A. The beneficial effect of insulin degludec on nocturnal hypoglycaemia and insulin dose in type 1 diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised trials. Acta Diabetol. 2015;52:231‐238.
    1. Lane W, Bailey TS, Gerety G, et al. Effect of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: the SWITCH 1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:33‐44.
    1. Marso SP, McGuire DK, Zinman B, et al. Efficacy and safety of degludec versus glargine in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:723‐732.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere