Management of inadequate keratinized gingiva and millers class III or IV gingival recession using two-stage free gingival graft procedure

Jacqueline Jacinta Dias, Mohinder Panwar, Manab Kosala, Jacqueline Jacinta Dias, Mohinder Panwar, Manab Kosala

Abstract

Background: Prognosis in the management of Millers Class III or IV gingival recession is often fair to poor, which is further decreased by factors such as inadequate keratinized gingiva. Very few modalities show long-term success in the management of gingival recession with inadequate keratinized gingiva, free gingival graft (FGG) being one such technique.

Materials and methods: Ten individuals with Millers Class III or IV recession and inadequate keratinized gingiva were recruited for the study. The first surgical procedure involved the FGG procedure to increase the width of keratinized gingiva (WOKG). Patients were recalled after 3 months for the second surgical procedure, where the flap was coronally advanced. They were recalled 9 months after the second surgery. WOKG was examined at baseline and 3 months (before the second surgical procedure). Recession depth (RD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) was examined at baseline, at 3 months (before the second surgical procedure) and at 12 months (9 months after the second surgical procedure). The percentage of root coverage was measured at 12 months from baseline.

Results: Significant increase in WOKG was seen at 3 months. Significant decrease in RD and CAL was observed at 12 months from baseline. The percentage of root coverage was 76.4%.

Conclusion: Two-stage FGG procedure can be a successful modality in the management of Millers Class III or IV recession with inadequate keratinized gingiva. This technique improves the prognosis of such compromised cases.

Keywords: Free gingival graft; gingival recession; inadequate keratinized gingiva; two stage.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Copyright: © 2020 Indian Society of Periodontology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gingival recession at baseline
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinical attachment level and recession depth in relation to 41 and 31
Figure 3
Figure 3
Width of keratinised gingiva in relation to 41 and 31
Figure 4
Figure 4
First surgical procedure-horizontal and vertical incisions
Figure 5
Figure 5
Partial thickness flap sutured to the periosteum at base
Figure 6
Figure 6
Harvesting of free gingival graft
Figure 7
Figure 7
Free gingival graft
Figure 8
Figure 8
Immobilisation of graft to recipient bed by suturing
Figure 9
Figure 9
Recipient site after 14 days
Figure 10
Figure 10
Recession depth and clinical attachment level at 3 months from baseline
Figure 11
Figure 11
Width of keratinised gingiva at 3 months from baseline
Figure 12
Figure 12
Second surgical procedure at 3 months from baseline-horizontal and vertical incisions
Figure 13
Figure 13
Partial thickness flap elevated
Figure 14
Figure 14
Coronally advanced flap sutured
Figure 15
Figure 15
Parameters at 12 months from baseline (9 months after second surgery)
Figure 16
Figure 16
Clinical attachment level and recession depth in relation to 41 and 31
Figure 17
Figure 17
Width of keratinised gingiva in relation to 41 and 31

References

    1. Borghetti A, Gardella JP. Thick gingival autograft for the coverage of gingival recession: A clinical evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1990;10:216–29.
    1. Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: A systematic review from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86:8–51.
    1. Sullivan HC, Atkins JH. Free autogenous gingival grafts. 3 Utilization of grafts in the treatment of gingival recession. Periodontics. 1968;6:152–60.
    1. Miller PD., Jr Root coverage using the free soft tissue autograft following citric acid application. III A successful and predictable procedure in areas of deep-wide recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985;5:14–37.
    1. Björn H. Free transplantation of gingiva propria. Odontol Revy. 1963;14:323.
    1. Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Modified two-stage procedures for the treatment of gingival recession. Eur J Esthet Dent Spring. 2013;8:24–42.
    1. Bernimoulin JP, Lüscher B, Mühlemann HR. Coronally repositioned periodontal flap. Clinical evaluation after one year. J Clin Periodontol. 1975;2:1–13.
    1. Camargo PM, Melnick PR, Kenney EB. The use of free gingival grafts for aesthetic purposes. Periodontol. 2000;2001(27):72–96.
    1. Blanes RJ, Allen EP. The bilateral pedicle flap-tunnel technique: A new approach to cover connective tissue grafts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999;19:471–9.
    1. Lang NP, Löe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol. 1972;43:623–7.
    1. Richardson CR, Allen EP, Chambrone L, Langer B, McGuire MK, Zabalegui I, et al. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: Practical applications from the AAP regeneration workshop. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2015;5:2–10.
    1. Matter J, Cimasoni G. Creeping attachment after free gingival grafts. J Periodontol. 1976;47:574–9.
    1. Agudio G, Nieri M, Rotundo R, Cortellini P, Pini Prato G. Free gingival grafts to increase keratinized tissue: A retrospective long-term evaluation (10 to 25 years) of outcomes. J Periodontol. 2008;79:587–94.
    1. Popova C, Boyarova T. Free gingival autograft for augmentation of keratinized tissue and stabilization of gingival recessions. J of IMAB. 2008;14:19–25.
    1. Jahnke PV, Sandifer JB, Gher ME, Gray JL, Richardson AC. Thick free gingival and connective tissue autografts for root coverage. J Periodontol. 1993;64:315–22.
    1. Wennström JL. Commentary: Treatment of periodontitis: Effectively managing mucogingival defects. J Periodontol. 2014;85:1639–41.
    1. Rath A, Varma S, Paul R. Two-stage mucogingival surgery with free gingival autograft and biomend membrane and coronally advanced flap in treatment of class III Millers Recession. Case Rep Dent. 2016;2016:9289634.
    1. Deo SD, Shetty SK, Kulloli A, Chavan R, Dholakia P, Ligade S, et al. Efficacy of free gingival graft in the treatment of Miller Class I and Class II localized gingival recessions: A systematic review. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019;23:93–9.
    1. Remya V, Kishore Kumar K, Sudharsan S, Arun KV. Free gingival graft in the treatment of class III gingival recession. Indian J Dent Res. 2008;19:247–52.
    1. Muthu J, Muthanandam S, Mahendra J. Complete root coverage in millers class III isolated gingival recession using free gingival graft – A 12 month follow up report. J Basic Clin Appl Health Sci. 2018;2:141–3.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere