The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol

J F W Rikken, C R Kowalik, M H Emanuel, M Y Bongers, T Spinder, J H de Kruif, K W M Bloemenkamp, F W Jansen, S Veersema, A G M G J Mulders, A L Thurkow, K Hald, A Mohazzab, Y Khalaf, T J Clark, M Farrugia, H A van Vliet, M S Stephenson, F van der Veen, M van Wely, B W J Mol, M Goddijn, J F W Rikken, C R Kowalik, M H Emanuel, M Y Bongers, T Spinder, J H de Kruif, K W M Bloemenkamp, F W Jansen, S Veersema, A G M G J Mulders, A L Thurkow, K Hald, A Mohazzab, Y Khalaf, T J Clark, M Farrugia, H A van Vliet, M S Stephenson, F van der Veen, M van Wely, B W J Mol, M Goddijn

Abstract

Background: A septate uterus is a uterine anomaly that may affect reproductive outcome, and is associated with an increased risk for miscarriage, subfertility and preterm birth. Resection of the septum is subject of debate. There is no convincing evidence concerning its effectiveness and safety. This study aims to assess whether hysteroscopic septum resection improves reproductive outcome in women with a septate uterus.

Methods/design: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing hysteroscopic septum resection and expectant management in women with recurrent miscarriage or subfertility and diagnosed with a septate uterus. The primary outcome is live birth, defined as the birth of a living foetus beyond 24 weeks of gestational age. Secondary outcomes are ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and complications following hysteroscopic septum resection. The analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. Kaplan-Meier curves will be constructed, estimating the cumulative probability of conception leading to live birth rate over time. Based on retrospective studies, we anticipate an improvement of the live birth rate from 35% without surgery to 70% with surgery. To demonstrate this difference, 68 women need to be randomised.

Discussion: Hysteroscopic septum resection is worldwide considered as a standard procedure in women with a septate uterus. Solid evidence for this recommendation is lacking and data from randomised trials is urgently needed.

Trial registration: Dutch trial registry ( NTR1676 , 18th of February 2009).

Keywords: Hysteroscopic septum resection; Randomised controlled trial; Recurrent miscarriage; Septate uterus; Subfertility.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The TRUST study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam at 28th of October 2008 (MEC 08/245). Written informed consent to participate in the study will be obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests, with the exception of:

A.L. Thurkow:

Member International Surgical Advisory Board for Gynaecology Olympus.

Member International Advisory Board for Energy Devices(Division of Ethicon inc., Johnson & Johnson).

Member Hologic International Advisory Board for minimal invasive procedures.

M.H. Emanuel:

Consultant and member medical advisory board Smith and Nephew Ltd.

Inventor and royalty receiver hysteroscopic morcellation Smith and Nephew Ltd.

Inventor and royalty receiver gel instillation sonohysterography GynaecologIQ BV.

S. Veersema:

Consultant at Bayer healthcare.

Member Hologic Advisory Board for minimal invasive procedures.

M.Y. Bongers:

Member Hologic Advisory Board for minimal invasive procedure

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart

References

    1. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. [review] Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(4):371–382. doi: 10.1002/uog.10056.
    1. March CM. Hysteroscopy as an aid to diagnosis in female infertility. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1983;26(2):302–312. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198306000-00010.
    1. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Marchini M, Franchi D, Tozzi L, Dorta M. Ultrastructural aspects of endometrium in infertile women with septate uterus. Fertility & Sterility. 1996;65(4):750–752. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58208-9.
    1. Dabirashrafi H, Bahadori M, Mohammad K, Alavi M, Moghadami-Tabrizi N, Zandinejad K, Ghafari V. Septate uterus: new idea on the histologic features of the septum in this abnormal uterus. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1995;172(1 Pt 1):105–107. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90093-4.
    1. Raga F, Casan EM, Bonilla-Musoles F. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors in the endometrium of septate uterus. Fertility & Sterility. 2009;92(3):1085–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1768.
    1. Jaslow CR. Uterine factors. [review] Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2014;41(1):57–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2013.10.002.
    1. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. [review] Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):761–771. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr028.
    1. Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. [review] [95 refs] Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(5):415–429. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn018.
    1. Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. [review] [100 refs] Fertility & Sterility. 2000;73(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00480-X.
    1. Nouri K, Ott J, Huber JC, Fischer EM, Stogbauer L, Tempfer CB. Reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic septoplasty in patients with septate uterus--a retrospective cohort study and systematic review of the literature. [review] [34 refs] Reproductive Biology & Endocrinology. 2010;8:52. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-52.
    1. Valle RF, Ekpo GE. Hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus: review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(1):22–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.010.
    1. Pang LH, Li MJ, Li M, Xu H, Wei ZL. Not every subseptate uterus requires surgical correction to reduce poor reproductive outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;115(3):260–263. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.030.
    1. Tonguc EA, Var T, Batioglu S. Hysteroscopic metroplasty in patients with a uterine septum and otherwise unexplained infertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113(2):128–130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.023.
    1. Tomazevic T, Ban-Frangez H, Virant-Klun I, Verdenik I, Pozlep B, Vrtacnik-Bokal E. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;21(5):700–705. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.028.
    1. Mollo A, De FP, Colacurci N, Cobellis L, Perino A, Venezia R, Alviggi C, De PG. Hysteroscopic resection of the septum improves the pregnancy rate of women with unexplained infertility: a prospective controlled trial. Fertility & Sterility. 2009;91(6):2628–2631. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.011.
    1. Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Lin BL, Aoki K, Maruyama T, Nakatsuka M, Ozawa N, Sugi T, Takeshita T, Nishida M. Does surgery improve live birth rates in patients with recurrent miscarriage caused by uterine anomalies? Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2015;35(2):155–158. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2014.936839.
    1. Pabuccu R, Gomel V. Reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic metroplasty in women with septate uterus and otherwise unexplained infertility. Fertility & Sterility. 2004;81(6):1675–1678. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.035.
    1. Christiansen OB, Nybo Andersen AM, Bosch E, Daya S, Delves PJ, Hviid TV, Kutteh WH, Laird SM, Li TC, van der Ven K. Evidence-based investigations and treatments of recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(4):821–839. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.018.
    1. Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 1999;14(11):2868–2871. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2868.
    1. Kowalik CR, Goddijn M, Emanuel MH, Bongers MY, Spinder T, de Kruif JH, Mol BW, Heineman MJ. Metroplasty versus expectant management for women with recurrent miscarriage and a septate uterus. [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(6):CD008576.
    1. Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker S, De AC, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Brolmann H, Gianaroli L, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032–2044. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det098.
    1. Grimbizis GF, Campo R. On behalf of the scientific Committee of the Congenital Uterine Malformations common Eshre/Esge working group: Stephan Gordts SBMGVTTCLCDA: clinical approach for the classification of congenital uterine malformations. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9(2):119–129. doi: 10.1007/s10397-011-0724-2.
    1. Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne JL, Ubeda B, Rodriguez I, Pedrero C. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(5):616–622. doi: 10.1002/uog.14825.
    1. Siam S, Soliman BS. Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for the detection of female genital system anomalies results of 3,811 infertile women. J Reprod Med. 2014;59(11–12):542–546.
    1. Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Kudla M, Pitynski K, Banas T, Jach R, Knafel A. Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional sonohysterography compared with office hysteroscopy and its interrater/intrarater agreement in uterine cavity assessment after hysteroscopic metroplasty. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1392–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.039.
    1. Faivre E, Fernandez H, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Frydman R, Levaillant JM. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(1):101–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.724.
    1. Coccia ME, Becattini C, Bracco GL, Bargelli G, Scarselli G. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for operative hysteroscopy a prospective study. J Reprod Med. 2000;45(5):413–418.
    1. Regan LBM, Rai R. The investigation and treatment of couples with recurrent firsttrimester and second-trimester miscarriage. RCOG green-top guideline. 2011;17:1–18.
    1. Goddijn M, van den Boogaard E, Steepers EA, Erwich JJ, Macklon NS, Land JA, Ankum WM. The guideline 'Recurrent miscarriage' (first revision) of the Dutch Society for Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008;152(30):1665–1670.
    1. Gaucherand P, Awada A, Rudigoz RC, Dargent D. Obstetrical prognosis of the septate uterus: a plea for treatment of the septum. [review] [25 refs] European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Biology. 1994;54(2):109–112. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90247-X.
    1. Valli E, Vaquero E, Lazzarin N, Caserta D, Marconi D, Zupi E. Hysteroscopic metroplasty improves gestational outcome in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. 2004;11(2):240–244. doi: 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60206-X.
    1. Kirk EP, Chuong CJ, Coulam CB, Williams TJ. Pregnancy after metroplasty for uterine anomalies. Fertility & Sterility. 1993;59(6):1164–1168. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55970-6.
    1. Maneschi F, Parlato M, Incandela S, Maneschi M. Reproductive performance in women with complete septate uteri. J Reprod Med. 1991;36(10):741–744.
    1. Heinonen PK. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies after abdominal or hysteroscopic metroplasty or no surgical treatment. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. 1997;4(3):311–317. doi: 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)80221-X.
    1. Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Lin BL, Aoki K, Maruyama T, Nakatsuka M, Ozawa N, Sugi T, Takeshita T, Nishida M. Does surgery improve live birth rates in patients with recurrent miscarriage caused by uterine anomalies? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(2):155–158. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2014.936839.
    1. Ludwin A, Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Mullerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(3):569–580. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu344.
    1. Smit JG, Overdijkink S, Mol BW, Kasius JC, Torrance HL, Eijkemans MJ, Bongers M, Emanuel MH, Vleugels M, Broekmans FJ. The impact of diagnostic criteria on the reproducibility of the hysteroscopic diagnosis of the septate uterus: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(6):1323–1330. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev082.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere