Effects of attention on the control of locomotion in individuals with chronic low back pain

Claudine J C Lamoth, John F Stins, Menno Pont, Frederick Kerckhoff, Peter J Beek, Claudine J C Lamoth, John F Stins, Menno Pont, Frederick Kerckhoff, Peter J Beek

Abstract

Background: People who suffer from low back pain (LBP) exhibit an abnormal gait pattern, characterized by shorter stride length, greater step width, and an impaired thorax-pelvis coordination which may undermine functional walking. As a result, gait in LBP may require stronger cognitive regulation compared to pain free subjects thereby affecting the degree of automaticity of gait control. Conversely, because chronic pain has a strong attentional component, diverting attention away from the pain might facilitate a more efficient walking pattern.

Methods: Twelve individuals with LBP and fourteen controls participated. Subjects walked on a treadmill at comfortable speed, under varying conditions of attentional load: (a) no secondary task, (b) naming the colors of squares on a screen, (c) naming the colors of color words ("color Stroop task"), and (d) naming the colors of words depicting motor activities. Markers were attached to the thorax, pelvis and feet. Motion was recorded using a three-camera SIMI system with a sample frequency of 100 Hz. To examine the effects of health status and attention on gait, mean and variability of stride parameters were calculated. The coordination between thoracic and pelvic rotations was quantified through the mean and variability of the relative phase between those oscillations.

Results: LBP sufferers had a lower walking speed, and consequently a smaller stride length and lower mean thorax-pelvis relative phase. Stride length variability was significantly lower in the LBP group but no significant effect of attention was observed. In both groups gait adaptations were found under performance of an attention demanding task, but significantly more so in individuals with LBP as indicated by an interaction effect on relative phase variability.

Conclusion: Gait in LBP sufferers was characterized by less variable upper body movements. The diminished flexibility in trunk coordination was aggravated under the influence of an attention demanding task. This provides further evidence that individuals with LBP tighten their gait control, and this suggests a stronger cognitive regulation of gait coordination in LBP. These changes in gait coordination reduce the capability to deal with unexpected perturbations, and are therefore maladaptive.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean (upper panel) and variability (lower panel) of stride length as a function of group and Stroop condition. CONTROL = walking without Stroop test; BASE = baseline Stroop condition; INCO = incongruent Stroop condition; MOVE = movement related Stroop condition. Error bars represent standard errors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean (upper panel) and variability (lower panel) of relative phase between pelvis and thorax rotations as a function of group and Stroop condition. CONTROL = walking without Stroop test; BASE = baseline Stroop condition; INCO = incongruent Stroop condition; MOVE = movement related Stroop condition. Error bars represent standard errors. Asterisk indicates a significant (p < .05) difference between the two levels.

References

    1. Lamoth CJC, Meijer OG, Daffertshofer A, Wuisman PI, Beek PJ. Effects of chronic low back pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking: changes in motor control. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:23–40. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0825-y.
    1. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture. 2002;16:1–14. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00156-4.
    1. Johnson MH, Petrie SM. The effects of distraction on exercise and cold pressor tolerance for chronic low back pain sufferers. Pain. 1997;69:43–48. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03272-1.
    1. Luoto S, Taimela S, Alaranta H, Hurri H. Psychomotor speed in chronic low-back pain patients and healthy controls: construct validity and clinical significance of the measure. Percept Mot Skills. 1998;87:1283–1296.
    1. Taimela S, Osterman K, Alaranta H, Soukka A, Kujala UM. Long psychomotor reaction time in patients with chronic low-back pain: preliminary report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1161–1164.
    1. Ahern DK, Follick MJ, Council JR, Laser-Wolston N, Litchman H. Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls. Pain. 1988;34:153–160. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1.
    1. Leeuw M, Goossens MEJB, Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JWS. The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence. J Behav Med. 2007;30:77–94. doi: 10.1007/s10865-006-9085-0.
    1. della Volpe R, Popa T, Ginanneschi F, Spidalieri R, Mazzocchio R, Rossi A. Changes in coordination of postural control during dynamic stance in chronic low back pain patients. Gait Posture. 2006;24:349–355. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.10.009.
    1. Brumagne S, Cordo P, Verschueren S. Proprioceptive weighting changes in persons with low back pain and elderly persons during upright standing. Neurosci Lett. 2004;366:63–66. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.013.
    1. Huang HJ, Mercer VS. Dual-task methodology: applications in studies of cognitive and motor performance in adults and children. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2001;13:133–140. doi: 10.1097/00001577-200110000-00005.
    1. Beauchet O, Dubost V, Herrman FR, Kressig RW. Stride-to-stride variability while backward counting among healthy young adults. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2005;2:26. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-2-26.
    1. Grabiner MD, Troy KL. Attention demanding tasks during treadmill walking reduce step width variability in youg adults. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2005;2:25. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-2-25.
    1. Lamoth CJC, Daffertshofer A, Meijer OG, Beek PJ. How do persons with chronic low back pain speed up and slow down?Trunk-pelvis coordination and lumbar erector spinae activity during gait. Gait Posture. 2006;23:230–239. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.02.006.
    1. Hollman JH, Kovash FM, Kubik JJ, Linbo RA. Age-related differences in spatiotemporal markers of gait stability during dual task walking. Gait Posture. 2007;26:113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.08.005.
    1. Canning CG, Ada L, Paul SS. Is automaticity of walking regained after stroke? Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:97–102. doi: 10.1080/09638280500167712.
    1. Eccleston C, Crombez G. Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psychol Bull. 1999;125:356–366. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.356.
    1. Vancleef LMG, Peters ML. The interruptive effect of pain on attention. J Pain. 2006;7:21–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.11.003.
    1. Veldhuijzen DS, Kenemans JL, de Bruin CM, Olivier B, Volkerts ER. Pain and attention: attentional disruption or distraction? J Pain. 2006;7:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.06.003.
    1. Roelofs J, Crombez G, Peters ML, Verschuere B, Vlaeyen JW. The modified Stroop paradigm as a measure of selective attention towards pain-related information in patients with chronic low back pain. Percept Mot Skills. 2005;100:955–963.
    1. Danion F, Varraine E, Bonnard M, Pailhous J. Stride variability in human gait: the effect of stride frequency and stride length. Gait Posture. 2003;18:69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00030-4.
    1. Hausdorff JM. Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2005;2:19. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-2-19.
    1. Yogev G, Giladi N, Peterz C, Springer S, Simon ES, Hausdorff JM. Dual tasking, gait rhythmicity and Parkinson's disease: which aspects of gait are attention demanding? Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:1248–1256. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04298.x.
    1. Daffertshofer A, Lamoth CJC, Meijer OG, Beek PJ. PCA in studying coordination and variability: A tutorial. Clin Biomech. 2004;19:415–428. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.01.005.
    1. Lamoth CJC, Beek PJ, Meijer OG. Pelvis-thorax coordination in the transverse plane during gait. Gait Posture. 2002;16:1–14. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00146-1.
    1. Dubost V, Kressig RW, Gonthier R, Herrmann FR, Aminian K, Nafaji B, Beauchet O. Relationships between dual-task related changes in stride velocity and stride time variability in healthy older adults. Hum Mov Sci. 2006;25:372–382. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2006.03.004.
    1. Roerdink M, Lamoth CJ, Kwakkel G, van Wieringen PC, Beek PJ. Gait coordination after stroke: benefits of acoustically paced treadmill walking. Phys Ther. 2007;87:1009–1022.
    1. Lamoth CJC, Meijer OG, Wuisman PI, van Dieen JH, Levin MF, Beek PJ. Pelvis-thorax coordination in the transverse plane during walking in persons with nonspecific low back pain. Spine. 2002;27:E92–E99. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200202150-00016.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Grisart JM, Plaghki LH. Impaired selective attention in chronic pain patients. Eur J Pain. 1999;3:325–333. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(99)90014-9.
    1. Seminowicz DA, Davis KD. A re-examination of pain-cognition interactions: Implications for neuroimaging. Pain. 2007;130
    1. Regnaux JP, Robertson J, Smail DB, Daniel O, Bussel B. Human treadmill walking needs attention. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2006;3:19. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-19.
    1. Lamoth CJC, Roerdink M, Beek PJ. Acoustically-paced treadmill walking requires more attention than unpaced treadmill walking in healthy young adults. Gait Posture. 2007;26S:S96.
    1. Netz Y, Tomer R, Axelrad S, Argov E, Inbar O. The effect of a single aerobic session on cognitive flexibility in late middle-aged adults. Int J Sports Med. 2007;28:82–87. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924027.
    1. Crombez G, Hermans D, Adriaensen H. The emotional stroop task and chronic pain: what is threatening for chronic pain sufferers? Eur J Pain. 2000;4:37–44. doi: 10.1053/eujp.1999.0149.
    1. Asmundson GJG, Wright KD, Hadjistavropoulos HD. Hypervigilance and attentional fixedness in chronic musculoskeletal pain: consistency of findings across modified Stroop and dot-probe tasks. J Pain. 2005;6:497–506. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.02.012.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere