Impact of long-term androgen deprivation therapy on PSMA ligand PET/CT in patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer

Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Nils Debus, Monika Uhrig, Thomas A Hope, Michael J Evans, Tim Holland-Letz, Frederik L Giesel, Klaus Kopka, Boris Hadaschik, Clemens Kratochwil, Uwe Haberkorn, Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Nils Debus, Monika Uhrig, Thomas A Hope, Michael J Evans, Tim Holland-Letz, Frederik L Giesel, Klaus Kopka, Boris Hadaschik, Clemens Kratochwil, Uwe Haberkorn

Abstract

Purpose: Since the introduction of PSMA PET/CT with 68Ga-PSMA-11, this modality for imaging prostate cancer (PC) has spread worldwide. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can significantly increase PSMA expression on PC cells. Additionally, retrospective clinical data in large patient cohorts suggest a positive association between ongoing ADT and a pathological PSMA PET/CT scan. The present evaluation was conducted to further analyse the influence of long-term ADT on PSMA PET/CT findings.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of all 1,704 patients who underwent a 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan at our institution from 2011 to 2017 to detect PC. Of 306 patients scanned at least twice, 10 had started and continued ADT with a continuous clinical response between the two PSMA PET/CT scans. These ten patients were included in the current analysis which compared the tracer uptake intensity and volume of PC lesions on PSMA PET/CT before and during ongoing ADT.

Results: Overall, 31 PC lesions were visible in all ten patients before initiation of ADT. However, during ongoing ADT (duration 42-369 days, median 230 days), only 14 lesions were visible in eight of the ten patients. The average tracer uptake values decreased in 71% and increased in 12.9% of the PC lesions. Of all lesions, 33.3% were still visible in six patients with a complete PSA response (≤0.1 ng/ml).

Conclusion: Continuous long-term ADT significantly reduces the visibility of castration-sensitive PC on PSMA PET/CT. If the objective is visualization of the maximum possible extent of disease, we recommend referring patients for PSMA PET/CT before starting ADT.

Keywords: 68Ga-PSMA-11; Androgen deprivation therapy; PET/CT; PSMA; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific membrane antigen.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethical approval

All patients discussed in this article provided signed informed consent for the anonymized evaluation and publication of their data. All reported investigations were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and with our national regulations (German Medicinal Products Act, AMG section 13 2b). This evaluation was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg (S-321-2012).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient selection flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The majority of PC lesions show clearly decreasing average tracer uptake (SUVmean, top) and tracer uptake to tumour volume ratios (bottom) during ongoing ADT. No bars are shown for those lesions that were no longer visible during ongoing ADT (on PET-2) or for those lesions without a clear morphological correlate in CT (impossible volume measuring). SUVmean values for the cut bar (number 3) were 20.3 on PET-1 and 27.2 on PET-2. Lesion allocations: lesions 1 and 2 (patient 1), lesions 3 and 4 (patient 2), lesions 5–9 (patient 3), lesions 10–14 (patient 4), lesion 15 (patient 5), lesions 16–18 (patient 6), lesion 19 (patient 7), lesions 20–25 (patient 8), lesions 26–30 (patient 9) and lesion 31 (patient 10)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The majority of PC lesions show clearly decreasing maximum tracer uptake (SUVmax, top) and tracer uptake to tumour volume ratios (bottom) during ongoing ADT. No bars are shown for lesions that were no longer visible during ongoing ADT (on PET-2)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Lymph node metastasis in an example patient (patient 8; yellow arrows) without ADT (a, b) and during ongoing ADT with a complete PSA response (c, d) 190 days after the first scan. During ongoing ADT, both, tracer uptake intensity and tumour volume significantly decreased. a Fused PET and CT image without ADT. b Maximum intensity projection image of the PET data without ADT. c Fused PET and CT image during ongoing ADT. Maximum intensity projection image of the PET data during ongoing ADT
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Lymph node metastasis in an example patient (patient 9) without ADT (ac) and during ongoing ADT with a complete PSA response (df) 228 days after the first scan (orange arrow left ureter). a Low-dose CT image without ADT. b Fused PET and CT image without ADT. c Maximum intensity projection image of the PET data without ADT. d–f same as a–c but during ongoing ADT
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Bone metastasis in an example patient (patient 1; yellow arrows) without ADT (a, b) and during ongoing ADT (c, d) 323 days after the first scan. a Fused PET and CT image without ADT. b Maximum intensity projection image of the PET data without ADT. c Fused PET and CT image during ongoing ADT. d Maximum intensity projection image of the PET data during ongoing ADT
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
A PSA response to ADT was observed in all patients (top). A complete imaging response (negative PSMA PET/CT) was observed in patient 4 and 10 although more patients showed a complete PSA response (BIC bicalutamide, LEU leuprorelin, TRI triptorelin)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Bone metastasis in an example patient (patient 6; yellow arrows; lesion 16 in Fig. 2) visible on both PET-1 and PET-2 with similar tracer uptake despite a complete PSA response (0.01 ng/ml) to ADT (a, b PET-1 without ADT; c, d PET-2 during ongoing ADT 270 days after the first scan). a Fused PET and CT image without ADT. b Low-dose CT image without ADT. c Fused PET and CT image during ongoing ADT. d Low-dose CT image during ongoing ADT
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Lymph node metastasis in an example patient (patient 9; yellow arrows) clearly visible on PET-1 without ADT (a, b) which became significantly less visible on PET-2 with a complete PSA response to ADT (c, d). a Fused PET and CT image without ADT. b Maximum intensity projection image of the PET data without ADT. c Fused PET and CT image during ongoing ADT. d Maximum intensity projection image of the PET data during ongoing ADT

References

    1. Israeli RS, Powell CT, Corr JG, Fair WR, Heston WD. Expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res. 1994;54:1807–1811.
    1. Wright GL, Jr, Grob BM, Haley C, Grossman K, Newhall K, Petrylak D, et al. Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen after androgen-deprivation therapy. Urology. 1996;48:326–334. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00184-7.
    1. Sweat SD, Pacelli A, Murphy GP, Bostwick DG. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression is greatest in prostate adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. Urology. 1998;52:637–640. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00278-7.
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Malcher A, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG, Hadaschik BA, et al. PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:486–495. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2298-2.
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Zechmann CM, Malcher A, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG, et al. Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:11–20. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2525-5.
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Avtzi E, Giesel FL, Holland-Letz T, Linhart HG, Eder M, et al. The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:197–209. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2949-6.
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Holland-Letz T, Giesel FL, Kratochwil C, Mier W, Haufe S, et al. Diagnostic performance of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: evaluation in 1007 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1258–1268. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3711-7.
    1. Eiber M, Maurer T, Souvatzoglou M, Beer AJ, Ruffani A, Haller B, et al. Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–674. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.154153.
    1. Morigi JJ, Stricker PD, van Leeuwen PJ, Tang R, Ho B, Nguyen Q, et al. Prospective comparison of 18F-fluoromethylcholine versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients who have rising PSA after curative treatment and are being considered for targeted therapy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1185–1190. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160382.
    1. Schwenck J, Rempp H, Reischl G, Kruck S, Stenzl A, Nikolaou K, et al. Comparison of (68)Ga-labelled PSMA-11 and (11)C-choline in the detection of prostate cancer metastases by PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:92–101. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3490-6.
    1. Evans MJ, Smith-Jones PM, Wongvipat J, Navarro V, Kim S, Bander NH, et al. Noninvasive measurement of androgen receptor signaling with a positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical that targets prostate-specific membrane antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:9578–9582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106383108.
    1. Meller B, Bremmer F, Sahlmann CO, Hijazi S, Bouter C, Trojan L, et al. Alterations in androgen deprivation enhanced prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in prostate cancer cells as a target for diagnostics and therapy. EJNMMI Res. 2015;5:66. doi: 10.1186/s13550-015-0145-8.
    1. Hope TA, Truillet CC, Ehman EC, Afshar-Oromieh A, Aggarwal R, Ryan CJ, et al. Imaging response to androgen receptor inhibition using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET: first human experience. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:81–84. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.181800.
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Wolf M, Haberkorn U, Kachelrieß M, Gnirs R, Kopka K, et al. Effects of arm truncation on the appearance of the halo artifact in (68)Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) PET/MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1636–1646. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3718-0.
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Hetzheim H, Kübler W, Kratochwil C, Giesel FL, Hope TA, et al. Radiation dosimetry of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) and preliminary evaluation of optimal imaging timing. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1611–1620. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3419-0.
    1. Eder M, Neels O, Müller M, Bauder-Wüst U, Remde Y, Schäfer M, et al. Novel preclinical and radiopharmaceutical aspects of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC: a new PET tracer for imaging of prostate cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2014;7:779–796. doi: 10.3390/ph7070779.
    1. Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, Bomanji J, Ceci F, Cho S, et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1014–1024. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3670-z.
    1. Liu T, Wu LY, Fulton MD, Johnson JM, Berkman CE. Prolonged androgen deprivation leads to downregulation of androgen receptor and prostate-specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2012;41:2087–2092. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1649.
    1. James ND, Sydes MR, Clarke NW, Mason MD, Dearnaley DP, Spears MR, et al. Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1163–1177. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01037-5.
    1. Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, Matsubara N, Rodriguez-Antolin A, Alekseev BY, et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone in metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:352–360. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704174.
    1. Kyriakopoulos CE, Chen Y-H, Carducci MA, Liu G, Jarrard DF, Hahn NM, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival analysis of the randomized phase III E3805 CHAARTED trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1080–1087. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.3657.
    1. Kratochwil C, Giesel FL, Stefanova M, Benešová M, Bronzel M, Afshar-Oromieh A, et al. PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with 177Lu-labeled PSMA-617. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1170–1176. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.171397.
    1. Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Giesel FL, Weis M, Verburg FA, Mottaghy F, et al. 225Ac-PSMA-617 for PSMA targeting alpha-radiation therapy of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1941–1944. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178673.
    1. Rahbar K, Bögemann M, Ahmadzadehfar H. 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy of mCRPC: evaluation criteria of response. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:166–167. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3530-2.
    1. Ahmadzadehfar H, Eppard E, Kürpig S, Fimmers R, Yordanova A, Schlenkhoff CD, et al. Therapeutic response and side effects of repeated radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-DKFZ-617 of castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:12477–12488. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7245.
    1. Rahbar K, Ahmadzadehfar H, Kratochwil C, Haberkorn U, Schäfers M, Essler M, et al. German multicenter study investigating 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in advanced prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:85–90. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.183194.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere