Improved results of ACL primary repair in one-part tears with intact synovial coverage

Atesch Ateschrang, Anna Janine Schreiner, Sufian S Ahmad, Steffen Schröter, Michael T Hirschmann, Daniel Körner, Sandro Kohl, Ulrich Stöckle, Marc-Daniel Ahrend, Atesch Ateschrang, Anna Janine Schreiner, Sufian S Ahmad, Steffen Schröter, Michael T Hirschmann, Daniel Körner, Sandro Kohl, Ulrich Stöckle, Marc-Daniel Ahrend

Abstract

Purpose: It was the aim to assess the influence of synovial sheath disruption on early failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair. It was hypothesized that more-part ACL tears with disruption of the synovial sheath are associated with a higher risk of failure after primary ACL repair.

Methods: A cohort study was conducted comprising patients with primal ACL tears undergoing primary ACL repair and dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS). The patients were stratified into three groups: A-one-part rupture with intact synovial membrane (n = 50), B-two-part ruptures resultant to separation of the ACL into two main bundles with synovial membrane tearing (n = 52) and C-more parts involving multilacerated ruptures with membrane disruption (n = 22). Failure was defined as a retear or residual laxity (anterior posterior translation > 5 mm compared to healthy knee). Adjustment for potential risk factors was performed using a multivariate logistic-regression model.

Results: The overall failure rate was 17.7% throughout the mean follow-up period of 2.3 ± 0.8 years. The failure rate in patients with one-part ACL tears with an intact synovial membrane was 4% (n = 2) (Group A), which was significantly lower than the failure rates in groups B and C, 26.9% (n = 14) (p = 0.001) and 27.3% (n = 6) (p = 0.003), respectively. Disruption of the synovial sheath in two- or more-part tears was identified as an independent factor influencing treatment failure in primary ACL repair (OR 8.9; 95% CI 2.0-40.0).

Conclusion: The integrity of the ACL bundles and synovial sheath is a factor that influences the success of ACL repair. This needs to be considered intra-operatively when deciding about repair.

Level of evidence: IV.

Keywords: ACL repair; Anterior cruciate ligament; Ligamys; Proximal ACL; Proximal tear; Reconstruction; Rupture; Suture; Tears.

References

    1. J Athl Train. 1995 Jun;30(2):149-52
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):199-217
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):641-7
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr;23(4):1215-21
    1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 13;16:27
    1. Unfallchirurg. 2015 Apr;118(4):364-71
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1583-90
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):1069-79
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1535-1541
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Aug;25(8):2414-2419
    1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 27;17:105
    1. Bone Joint J. 2016 Jun;98-B(6):793-8
    1. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Sep;136(9):1265-1272
    1. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Nov/Dec;45(7):E393-E405
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Dec;25(12):3923-3928
    1. Arthroscopy. 2017 Apr;33(4):693-694
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Apr;26(4):1182-1189
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):374-380
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):589-595
    1. Knee. 2017 Oct;24(5):898-908
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):655-659
    1. Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Sep 11;6(5):e1529-e1534
    1. Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1085-1093
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct;26(10):2978-2985
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):29-36

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere