Darolutamide and Survival in Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Matthew R Smith, Maha Hussain, Fred Saad, Karim Fizazi, Cora N Sternberg, E David Crawford, Evgeny Kopyltsov, Chandler H Park, Boris Alekseev, Álvaro Montesa-Pino, Dingwei Ye, Francis Parnis, Felipe Cruz, Teuvo L J Tammela, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Tapio Utriainen, Cheng Fu, Motohide Uemura, María J Méndez-Vidal, Benjamin L Maughan, Heikki Joensuu, Silke Thiele, Rui Li, Iris Kuss, Bertrand Tombal, ARASENS Trial Investigators

Abstract

Background: Darolutamide is a potent androgen-receptor inhibitor that has been associated with increased overall survival among patients with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. Whether a combination of darolutamide, androgen-deprivation therapy, and docetaxel would increase survival among patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is unknown.

Methods: In this international, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in a 1:1 ratio to receive darolutamide (at a dose of 600 mg [two 300-mg tablets] twice daily) or matching placebo, both in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy and docetaxel. The primary end point was overall survival.

Results: The primary analysis involved 1306 patients (651 in the darolutamide group and 655 in the placebo group); 86.1% of the patients had disease that was metastatic at the time of the initial diagnosis. At the data cutoff date for the primary analysis (October 25, 2021), the risk of death was significantly lower, by 32.5%, in the darolutamide group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.80; P<0.001). Darolutamide was also associated with consistent benefits with respect to the secondary end points and prespecified subgroups. Adverse events were similar in the two groups, and the incidences of the most common adverse events (occurring in ≥10% of the patients) were highest during the overlapping docetaxel treatment period in both groups. The frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 66.1% in the darolutamide group and 63.5% in the placebo group; neutropenia was the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event (in 33.7% and 34.2%, respectively).

Conclusions: In this trial involving patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, overall survival was significantly longer with the combination of darolutamide, androgen-deprivation therapy, and docetaxel than with placebo plus androgen-deprivation therapy and docetaxel, and the addition of darolutamide led to improvement in key secondary end points. The frequency of adverse events was similar in the two groups. (Funded by Bayer and Orion Pharma; ARASENS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02799602.).

Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Figures

Figure 1.. Overall Survival (Full Analysis Set).
Figure 1.. Overall Survival (Full Analysis Set).
Kaplan−Meier estimates of overall survival are shown. For the analysis of overall survival, data were censored as of the last known date the patients were alive. One patient who was randomly assigned to the placebo group but received darolutamide was included in the placebo group in the full analysis set. CI denotes confidence interval, and NE not estimable.
Figure 2.. Analyses of Secondary End Points…
Figure 2.. Analyses of Secondary End Points (Full Analysis Set).
Panel A shows the time to castration-resistant prostate cancer, and Panel B shows the time to pain progression. The Kaplan−Meier method was used to estimate the time to events; data were censored at the date of the patients’ last assessment for that end point. One patient who was randomly assigned to the placebo group but received darolutamide was included in the placebo group in the full analysis set.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere