Diagnostic imaging of sacroiliac joints and the spine in the course of spondyloarthropathies

Iwona Sudoł-Szopinska, Andrzej Urbanik, Iwona Sudoł-Szopinska, Andrzej Urbanik

Abstract

Spondyloarthropathies belong to a group of rheumatic diseases, in which inflammatory changes affect mainly the sacroiliac joints, spine, peripheral joints, tendon, ligaments and capsule attachments (entheses). This group includes 6 entities: ankylosing spondylitis, arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease, reactive arthritis, undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy, psoriatic arthritis and juvenile spondyloarthropathy. In 2009, ASAS (Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society) association, published classification criteria for spondyloarthropathies, which propose standardization of clinical-diagnostic approach in the case of sacroiliitis, spondylitis and arthritis. Radiological diagnosis of inflammatory changes of sacroiliac joints is based on a 4 step radiographic grading method from 1966. According to modified New York criteria, the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis is made based on the presence of advanced lesions, sacroiliitis of at least 2 grade bilaterally or 3-4 unilaterally. In case of other types of spondyloarthropathies diagnosis is made based on presence of at least grade 1 changes. In MRI, active inflammation of sacroiliac joints is indicated by the presence of subchondral bone marrow edema, synovitis, bursitis, or enthesitis. ASAS discusses only the classic form of axial spondyloarthropathies, which is ankylosing spondylitis. To quantify radiological inflammatory changes in the course of the disease, Stoke Ankylosing spondylitis classification Spinal Score (SASSS) is recommended. The signs of inflammation and scarrying of the spinal cord in the course of ankylosing spondylitis, present in MRI include: bone marrow edema, sclerosis, fat metaplasia, formation of syndesmophytes, and ankylosis.

Keywords: diagnostics; magnetic resonance imaging; radiograms; sacroiliitis; spondyloartropathies.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sacroilitis: (A) grade 1; (B) grade 2; (C) grade 3; (D) grade 4.
Figure 2
Figure 2
X-ray examination of lumbar spine in AP (A) and lateral projection (B): „bamboo spine” (rigidity of several segments), squaring of L5 vertebral body, syndesmophytes, ankylosis of intervertebral joints.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lateral x-ray of cervical spine: anterior dislocation, syndesmophytes on levels C3/C4 and C5/C6, ankylosis of C2–C6 intervertebral joints.
Figure 4
Figure 4
MR examination of sacroiliac joints, images: T1- (A), T2 TIRM (B), T1FSCE-weighted (C): bone marrow edema, more pronounced in right sacroiliac joint, particularly in the iliac bone as well as erosions undergoing strong enhancement following administration of contrast medium, contrast enhancement and thickening of synovial membrane in the sacroiliac joint (synovitis), inflammation of right sacroiliac joint capsule (capsulitis), subchondral sclerosis – more pronounced on the left.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Chronic inflammation in sacroiliac joints in T1- (A) and T1FS-weighted (B) images: fatty transformation of the sacral bone and iliac bones, partial sacroiliac joint ankylosis on right side.
Figure 6
Figure 6
„Shiny corners” of anterior vertebral bodies in the lumbar region; inflammation of intervertebral joints L1–L5 with signs of bone marrow edema in T2 TIRM image (A) enhanced after administration of contrast medium in T2FSCE-weighted image (B).

References

    1. Saraux A, Guillemin F, Guggenbuhl P, et al. Prevalence of the spondyloarthropathies in France. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;64:1431–35.
    1. Reveille JD. Epidemiology of Spondyloarthritis in North America. Am J Med Sci. 2011;341:284–86.
    1. Filipowicz-Sosnowska A, Zimmermann-Górska I, Musiał J, et al. Choroby układowe tkanki łącznej. In: Szczeklik J, editor. Choroby wewnętrzne Stan wiedzy na rok 2011. Medycyna Praktyczna; Kraków: 2011. pp. 1728–90. [in Polish]
    1. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (partII)): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:777–83.
    1. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:25–31.
    1. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, et al. The assessment of SpondyloArtritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1–44.
    1. Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, et al. New criteria for inflammatory back pain in patients with chronic back pain: a real patient exercise by experts from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:784–88.
    1. Van der Berg, van der Heijde D. How should we diagnose spondyloarthritis according to the ASAS classification criteria. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2010;120:452–57.
    1. Sudoł-Szopińska I, Zaniewicz-Kaniewska K, Warczyńska A, et al. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis in radiological studies. Part II: Imaging studies in RA. J Ultrason. 2012;50:319–28.
    1. Drakonaki E. Ultrasound elastography for imaging tendons and muscles. J Ultrason. 2012;12(49):214–25.
    1. Czyrny Z. Diagnostic anatomy and diagnostics of enthesal pathologies of the rotator cuff. J Ultrason. 2012;12(49):178–87.
    1. Dębek A, Nowicki P, Czyrny Z. Ultrasonographic diagnostics of pain in the lateral cubital compartment and proximal forearm. J Ultrason. 2012;12(49):188–201.
    1. Braun J, Landewé R, Hermann KG, et al. Major reduction in spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after treatment with infliximab: results of a multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled magnetic resonance imaging study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1646–52.
    1. Geijer M, Gadeholt Göthlin G, Göthlin JH. The validity of the New York radiological grading criteria in diagnosing sacroiliitis by computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:664–73.
    1. Huerta-sil G, Casasola-vargas JC, Londoño JD, et al. Low grade radiographic sacroiliitis as prognostic factor in patients with undifferentiated spondyloarthritis fulfilling diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis throughout follow up. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:642–46.
    1. Stanisławska-Biernat E, Œwierkot J, Tłustochowicz W. Spondyloartropatie. Reumatologia. 2012;50(2):93–102.
    1. Canella C, Schau B, Ribeiro E, et al. MRI in Seronegative Spondyloarthritis: Imaging Features and Differential Diagnosis in the Spine and Sacroiliac Joints. AJR. 2013;200:149–57.
    1. Tuite MJ. Sacroiliac Joint Imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2008;12:72–82.
    1. Maksymowych WP, Chiowchanwisawakit P, Clare T, et al. Inflammatory lesions of the spine on magnetic resonance imaging predict the development of new syndesmophytes in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:93–102.
    1. Bennett AN, Rehman A, Hensor EM, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic utility of spinal magnetic resonance imaging in axial spondylarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:1331–41.
    1. Bennett AN, Rehman A, Hensor EM, et al. The fatty Romanus lesion: a noninflammatory spinal MRI lesion specific for axial spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:891–94.
    1. Feldtkeller E, Khan MA, van der Jeijde D, et al. Age at disease onset and diagnosis delay in HLA-B27 negative vs. positive patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2003;23:61–66.
    1. Ozgocmen S, Ardicoglu O, Kamanli A, et al. Pattern of disease onset, diagnostic delay, and clinical features in juvenile onset and adult onset ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:2830–33.
    1. Braun J, van der Haijde D. Imaging and scoring in ankylosing spondylitis. Best Pract Res Clin Reumatol. 2002;16:573–604.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere