The By-Band study: gastric bypass or adjustable gastric band surgery to treat morbid obesity: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot phase

Chris A Rogers, Richard Welbourn, James Byrne, Jenny L Donovan, Barnaby C Reeves, Sarah Wordsworth, Robert Andrews, Janice L Thompson, Paul Roderick, David Mahon, Hamish Noble, Jamie Kelly, Graziella Mazza, Katie Pike, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Natalie Blencowe, Mary Perkins, Tanya Porter, Jane M Blazeby, Chris A Rogers, Richard Welbourn, James Byrne, Jenny L Donovan, Barnaby C Reeves, Sarah Wordsworth, Robert Andrews, Janice L Thompson, Paul Roderick, David Mahon, Hamish Noble, Jamie Kelly, Graziella Mazza, Katie Pike, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Natalie Blencowe, Mary Perkins, Tanya Porter, Jane M Blazeby

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of severe and complex obesity is increasing worldwide and surgery may offer an effective and lasting treatment. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery are the two main surgical procedures performed.

Design: This open parallel-group randomised controlled trial will compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of gastric band (Band) versus gastric bypass (Bypass) in adults with severe and complex obesity. It has an internal pilot phase (in two centres) with integrated qualitative research to establish effective and optimal methods for recruitment. Adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m2 or more, or a BMI of 35 kg/m2 or more and other co-morbidities will be recruited. At the end of the internal pilot the study will expand into more centres if the pre-set progression criteria of numbers and rates of eligible patients screened and randomised are met and if the expected rates of retention and adherence to treatment allocation are achieved. The trial will test the joint hypotheses that Bypass is non-inferior to Band with respect to more than 50% excess weight loss and that Bypass is superior to Band with respect to health related quality of life (HRQOL, EQ-5D) at three years. Secondary outcomes include other weight loss measures, waist circumference and remission/resolution of co-morbidities; generic and symptom-specific HRQOL; nutritional blood test results; resource use; eating behaviours and adverse events. A core outcome set for reporting the results of obesity surgery will be developed and a systematic review of the evidence for sleeve gastrectomy undertaken to inform the main study design.

Discussion: By-Band is the first pragmatic study to compare the two most commonly performed bariatric surgical procedures for severe and complex obesity. The design will enable and empower surgeons to learn to recruit and participate in a randomised study. Early evidence shows that timely recruitment is possible.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN00786323.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial schema. Schema showing the number of patients to be recruited in Phase 1 (two centres) and Phase 2 (eight centres), with the anticipated eligibility, recruitment and follow-up rates.

References

    1. The health survey for England - 2010 trend tables. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2011.
    1. Public Health England Obesity Knowledge and Intelligence team. 2013. Available from: [ ]
    1. WHO. Obesity and overweight (WHO fact sheet number 311) 2013. Available from: [ ]
    1. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Brown W, Schachter LM, Chapman L, Burn AJ. et al.The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (Lap-Band): a prospective study of medium-term effects on weight, health and quality of life. Obes Surg. 2002;12(5):652–660. doi: 10.1381/096089202321019639. Epub 2002/11/27.
    1. Clegg AJ, Colquitt J, Sidhu MK, Royle P, Loveman E, Walker A. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgery for people with morbid obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(12):1–153. Epub 2002/08/28.
    1. Collaboration PS, Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J. et al.Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900,000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1083–1096. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60318-4. Epub 2009/03/21.
    1. Law C, Power C, Graham H, Merrick D. Obesity and health inequalities. Obes Rev. 2007;8(Suppl 1):19–22. Epub 2007/02/24.
    1. Allender S, Rayner M. The burden of overweight and obesity-related ill health in the UK. Obes Rev. 2007;8(5):467–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00394.x. Epub 2007/08/25.
    1. Puhl RM, Moss-Racusin CA, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. Weight stigmatization and bias reduction: perspectives of overweight and obese adults. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(2):347–358. Epub 2007/09/22.
    1. Throsby K. ‘How could you let yourself get like that?’ Stories of the origins of obesity in accounts of weight loss surgery. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(8):1561–1571. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.005. Epub 2007/07/27.
    1. Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, Gospodarevskaya E, Loveman E, Baxter L. et al.The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(41):1–190. 215–357, iii-iv. Epub 2009/09/04.
    1. NICE. Obesity: the Prevention, Identification, Assessment and Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults and Children. London; 2006. Available from: [ ]
    1. Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB, Share D, Hawasli A, English WJ, Genaw J. et al.Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 2010;304(4):435–442. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1034. Epub 2010/07/29.
    1. Dendrite Clinical Systems Ltd. National Bariatric Surgery Registry. 2nd report. Dendrite Clinical Systems Ltd; 2009. Available from: [ ]
    1. Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC, Wahed AS, Berk P, Chapman W. et al.Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):445–454. Epub 2009/07/31.
    1. Tice JA, Karliner L, Walsh J, Petersen AJ, Feldman MD. Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med. 2008;121(10):885–893. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.05.036. Epub 2008/10/01.
    1. Puzziferri N, Nakonezny PA, Livingston EH, Carmody TJ, Provost DA, Rush AJ. Variations of weight loss following gastric bypass and gastric band. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):233–242. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181820cbc. Epub 2008/07/25.
    1. Surgeon specific outcome reports for bariatric surgery. 2013. Available from: [ ]
    1. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):427–436. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0. Epub 2013/01/23.
    1. Angrisani L, Lorenzo M, Borrelli V. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: five-year results of a prospective randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(2):127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.12.005. discussion 32–3. Epub 2007/03/03.
    1. Angrisani L, Cutolo PP, Formisano G, Nosso G, Vitolo G. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(3):405–413. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.11.011. Epub 2013/03/05.
    1. Nguyen NT, Slone JA, Nguyen XM, Hartman JS, Hoyt DB. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2009;250(4):631–641. Epub 2009/09/05.
    1. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208. Epub 1990/11/05.
    1. Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T. et al.Quality improvement report: improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult. BMJ. 2002;325(7367):766–770. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766. Epub 2002/10/05.
    1. Donovan JL, Lane JA, Peters TJ, Brindle L, Salter E, Gillatt D. et al.Development of a complex intervention improved randomization and informed consent in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(1):29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.010. Epub 2008/07/16.
    1. Donovan JL, Parmasivan S, de Salis I, Torrien M. Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2014;15(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-5.
    1. Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, Garvey WT, Hurley DL, McMahon MM. et al.Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient-2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Endocr Pract. 2013;19(2):337–372. doi: 10.4158/. Epub 2013/03/27.
    1. Sjostrom L. Review of the key results from the Swedish obese subjects (SOS) trial - a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219–234. doi: 10.1111/joim.12012.
    1. Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. An integrated method to determine meaningful changes in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(11):1153–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.004. Epub 2004/11/30.
    1. Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-lite) in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(2):157–171. doi: 10.1023/A:1015081805439. Epub 2002/05/23.
    1. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E. et al.Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995;82(2):216–222. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820229. Epub 1995/02/01.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. Epub 1983/06/01.
    1. Chung F, Elsaid H. Screening for obstructive sleep apnea before surgery: why is it important? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22(3):405–411. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32832a96e2. Epub 2009/05/05.
    1. Parkes J, Roderick P, Harris S, Day C, Mutimer D, Collier J. et al.Enhanced liver fibrosis test can predict clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut. 2010;59(9):1245–1251. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.203166. Epub 2010/08/03.
    1. Buse JB, Caprio S, Cefalu WT, Ceriello A, Del Prato S, Inzucchi SE. et al.How do we define cure of diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2009;32(11):2133–2135. doi: 10.2337/dc09-9036. Epub 2009/10/31.
    1. Excellence NIfHaC. Available from: [ ]
    1. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 1996;276(15):1253–1258. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540150055031. Epub 1996/10/16.
    1. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316(7133):736–741. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.736. Epub 1998/04/08.
    1. Brolin RE. Bariatric surgery and long-term control of morbid obesity. JAMA. 2002;288(22):2793–2796. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2793. Epub 2002/12/11.
    1. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC. et surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1105–1112. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8. Epub 2009/09/29.
    1. Tugwell P, Boers M, Brooks P, Simon L, Strand V, Idzerda L. OMERACT: an international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology. Trials. 2007;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-38. Epub 2007/11/28.
    1. COMET Initiative. Available from: [ ]
    1. MRC ConDuCT Hub. Available from: [ ]
    1. Donovan J, Hamdy F, Neal D, Peters T, Oliver S, Brindle L. et al.Prostate testing for cancer and treatment (ProtecT) feasibility study. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(14):1–88. Epub 2003/04/24.
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Higgins JPT, Green S, editor. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2008. Assessing risk of bias in included studies; pp. 187–241.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere