Challenges of Population-based Measurement of Suicide Prevention Activities Across Multiple Health Systems

Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Brian K Ahmedani, Jennifer M Boggs, Arne Beck, Karen J Coleman, Stacy Sterling, Michael Schoenbaum, Julie Goldstein-Grumet, Gregory E Simon, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Brian K Ahmedani, Jennifer M Boggs, Arne Beck, Karen J Coleman, Stacy Sterling, Michael Schoenbaum, Julie Goldstein-Grumet, Gregory E Simon

Abstract

Suicide is a preventable public health problem. Zero Suicide (ZS) is a suicide prevention framework currently being evaluated by Mental Health Research Network investigators embedded in six Health Care Systems Research Network (HCSRN) member health systems implementing ZS. This paper describes ongoing collaboration to develop population-based process improvement metrics for use in, and comparison across, these and other health systems. Robust process improvement metrics are sorely needed by the hundreds of health systems across the country preparing to implement their own best practices in suicide care. Here we articulate three examples of challenges in using health system data to assess suicide prevention activities, each in ascending order of complexity: 1) Mapping and reconciling different versions of suicide risk assessment instruments across health systems; 2) Deciding what should count as adequate suicide prevention follow-up care and how to count it in different health systems with different care processes; and 3) Trying to determine whether a safety planning discussion took place between a clinician and a patient, and if so, what actually happened. To develop broadly applicable metrics, we have advocated for standardization of care processes and their documentation, encouraged standardized screening tools and urged they be recorded as discrete electronic health record (EHR) variables, and engaged with our clinical partners and health system data architects to identify all relevant care processes and the ways they are recorded in the EHR so we are not systematically missing important data. Serving as embedded research partners in our local ZS implementation teams has facilitated this work.

Keywords: electronic health record; health systems; population-based; suicide prevention; zero suicide.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors received grant funding from the National Institute of Mental Health (grant number MH114087) to conduct an evaluation of the implementation of Zero Suicide across six health care systems. MS is Senior Advisor for Mental Health Services, Epidemiology, and Economics, Division of Services and Intervention Research, National Institute of Mental Health. BY, BA, AB, JB, KC, and GS have received additional funding from the National Institutes of Health for research related to this topic. BY and KC have also received honoraria for grant review from the National Institutes of Health (not related to this topic but in general). JGG is Director of the Zero Suicide Institute which receives payment for consultation and training in the Zero Suicide model; she is also the co-PI or Subject Matter Expert/Consultant on multiple grants on suicide prevention and Zero Suicide.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Query tool for fatal injury from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. [updated February 19, 2017]. Available from: .
    1. Rockett, IR, Smith, GS, Caine, ED, Kapusta, ND, Hanzlick, RL, Larkin, GL, et al. Confronting death from drug self-intoxication (DDSI): Prevention through a better definition. Am J Public Health. 2014; 104(12): e49–55. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302244
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Vital Signs: Suicide Rising Across the US; 2018.
    1. Office of the Surgeon General, National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. Publications and Reports of the Surgeon General 2012 National Strategy for Suicide Prevention: Goals and Objectives for Action: A Report of the US Surgeon General and of the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. Washington (DC): US Department of Health & Human Services (US); 2012.
    1. National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention: Transforming Health Systems Initiative Work Group. Recommended Standard Care for People with Suicide Risk: Making Health Care Suicide Safe Washington, DC: Education Development Center, Inc; 2018.
    1. Ahmedani, BK, Simon, GE, Stewart, C, Beck, A, Waitzfelder, BE, Rossom, R, et al. Health care contacts in the year before suicide death. J Gen Intern Med. 2014; 29(6): 870–7. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2767-3
    1. Ahmedani, BK, Stewart, C, Simon, GE, Lynch, F, Lu, CY, Waitzfelder, BE, et al. Racial/Ethnic differences in health care visits made before suicide attempt across the United States. Med Care. 2015; 53(5): 430–5. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000335
    1. Education Development Center Inc. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care [06/05/2018]. Available from: .
    1. Zero Suicide. The International Zero Suicide Summits [06/05/2018]. Available from: .
    1. Coffey, CE. Pursuing perfect depression care. Psychiatr Serv. 2006; 57(10): 1524–6. DOI: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1524
    1. Coffey, CE. Building a system of perfect depression care in behavioral health. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007; 33(4): 193–9. DOI: 10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33022-5
    1. Ahmedani, BK, Coffey, J and Coffey, CE. Collecting mortality data to drive real-time improvement in suicide prevention. Am J Manag Care. 2013; 19(11): e386–90.
    1. Coffey, CE, Coffey, MJ and Ahmedani, BK. An update on perfect depression care. Psychiatr Serv. 2013; 64(4): 396 DOI: 10.1176/appi.PS.640422
    1. Hampton, T. Depression care effort brings dramatic drop in large HMO population’s suicide rate. JAMA. 2010; 303(19): 1903–5. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.595
    1. Coffey, MJ, Coffey, CE and Ahmedani, BK. Suicide in a health maintenance organization population. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015; 72(3): 294–6. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2440
    1. Esposito, L. Strides in Suicide Prevention: US News and World Report; 2015. [06/05/2018]. Available from: .
    1. Mental Health Research Network (MHRN). Mental Health Research Network (MHRN) [06/05/2018]. Available from: .
    1. Stewart, C, Crawford, PM and Simon, GE. Changes in Coding of Suicide Attempts or Self-Harm With Transition From ICD-9 to ICD-10. Psychiatr Serv. 2017; 68(3): 215 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600450
    1. Lu, CY, Stewart, C, Ahmed, AT, Ahmedani, BK, Coleman, K, Copeland, LA, et al. How complete are E-codes in commercial plan claims databases? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014; 23(2): 218–20. DOI: 10.1002/pds.3551
    1. Kroenke, K, Spitzer, RL and Williams, JB. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16(9): 606–13. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
    1. Simon, GE, Coleman, KJ, Rossom, RC, Beck, A, Oliver, M, Johnson, E, et al. Risk of suicide attempt and suicide death following completion of the Patient Health Questionnaire depression module in community practice. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016; 77(2): 221–7. DOI: 10.4088/JCP.15m09776
    1. Posner, K, Brown, GK, Stanley, B, Brent, DA, Yershova, KV, Oquendo, MA, et al. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011; 168(12): 1266–77. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704
    1. Stanley, B and Brown, GK. Safety planning: An intervention to mitigate suicide risk Washington, D.C.: Veterans Health Administration Publication; 2008.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere