DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in early equivocal appeNDicitis (DIAMOND): open-label, randomized clinical trial

Kirsi S Lastunen, Ari K Leppäniemi, Panu J Mentula, Kirsi S Lastunen, Ari K Leppäniemi, Panu J Mentula

Abstract

Background: Mild appendicitis may resolve spontaneously. The use of CT may lead to an overdiagnosis of uncomplicated appendicitis. The aims of this study were to examine whether early imaging results in more patients being diagnosed with acute appendicitis than initial observation, and to study the safety and feasibility of score-based observation compared with imaging in patients with equivocal signs of appendicitis.

Methods: Patients with suspected appendicitis with symptoms for fewer than 24 h and an Adult Appendicitis Score of 11-15 were eligible for this trial. After exclusions, patients were randomized openly into two equal-sized groups: imaging and observation. Patients in the imaging group had ultrasound imaging followed by CT when necessary, whereas those in the observation group were reassessed after 6-8 h with repeated scoring and managed accordingly. The primary outcome was the number of patients requiring treatment for acute appendicitis within 30 days.

Results: Ninety-three patients were randomized to imaging and 92 to observation; after exclusions, 93 and 88 patients respectively were analysed. In the imaging group, more patients underwent treatment for acute appendicitis than in the observation group: 72 versus 57 per cent (difference 15 (95 per cent c.i. 1 to 29) per cent). This suggests that patients with spontaneously resolving appendicitis were not diagnosed or treated in the observation group. Some 55 per cent of patients in the observation group did not need diagnostic imaging within 30 days after randomization. There was no difference in the number of patients diagnosed with complicated appendicitis (4 versus 2 per cent) or negative appendicectomies (1 versus 1 per cent) in the imaging and observation groups.

Conclusion: Score-based observation of patients with early equivocal appendicitis results in fewer patients requiring treatment for appendicitis. Registration number: NCT02742402 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram for the trial AAS, Adult Appendicitis Score; CRP, C-reactive protein.

References

    1. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, Venus LG, Novelline RA. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 1999;229:344–349
    1. Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis. Ann Surg 2007;245:886–892
    1. Andersson RE, Anning HL. Resolving appendicitis is common: further evidence—reply. Ann Surg 2008;247:553–553
    1. Morino M, Pellegrino L, Castagna E, Farinella E, Mao P. Acute nonspecific abdominal pain. Ann Surg 2006;244:881–888
    1. Decadt B, Sussman L, Lewis MP, Secker A, Cohen L, Rogers C et al. Randomized clinical trial of early laparoscopy in the management of acute non-specific abdominal pain. Br J Surg 1999;86:1383–1386
    1. Park HC, Kim MJ, Lee BH. Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis. Br J Surg 2017;103:656–1790
    1. Andersson M, Kolodziej B, Andersson RE; STRAPPSCORE Study Group . Randomized clinical trial of Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score-based management of patients with suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg 2017;104:1451–1461
    1. Andersson R, Hugander A, Thulin A, Nystrom PO, Olaison G et al. Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. BMJ 1994;308:107–110
    1. Wang Q, Morikawa Y, Ueno R, Tomita H, Ihara T, Hagiwara Y et al. Prognosis of ultrasonographic low-grade pediatric appendicitis treated with supportive care. Surgery 2021;170:215–221
    1. Harnoss JC, Zelienka I, Probst P, Grummich K, Müller-Lantzsch C, Harnoss JM et al. Antibiotics versus surgical therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials (PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015016882). Ann Surg 2017;265:889–900
    1. Lahaye MJ, Lambregts DMJ, Mutsaers E, Essers BAB, Breukink S, Cappendijk VC et al. Mandatory imaging cuts costs and reduces the rate of unnecessary surgeries in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of having appendicitis. Eur Radiol 2015;25:1464–1470
    1. van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology 2008; 249:97–106
    1. Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Pooler BD, Bruce RJ. Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:789–796,W-291.
    1. Lee KH, Lee S, Park JH, Lee SS, Kim HY, Lee WJ et al. Risk of hematologic malignant neoplasms from abdominopelvic computed tomographic radiation in patients who underwent appendectomy. JAMA Surg 2021;156:343–351
    1. Andersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg 2008;32:1843–1849
    1. Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppäniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis—a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 2014;14:910
    1. Sammalkorpi HE, Leppäniemi A, Lantto E, Mentula P. Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score. World J Emerg Surg 2017;12:6–8
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;3:175–191
    1. Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordström P, Aarnio M, Rantanen T et al. Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. JAMA 2015;313:2340–2349
    1. Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S, Pautrat K, Leconte M, Costaglioli B et al. Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1573–1579
    1. Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Savolainen H, Leppäniemi A. The introduction of adult appendicitis score reduced negative appendectomy rate. Scand J Surg 2017;106:196–201
    1. Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology: the impact of new epidemiological data. Br J Radiol 2012;85:e1316–e1317
    1. Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993–2008. J Surg Res 2012;175:185–190
    1. Rogers W, Hoffman J, Noori N. Harms of CT scanning prior to surgery for suspected appendicitis. Evid Based Med 2015;20:3–4
    1. CODA Collaborative, Flum DR, Davidson GH, Monsell SE, Shapiro NI, Odom SR et al. A randomized trial comparing antibiotics with appendectomy for appendicitis. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1907–1919
    1. Sauvain MO, Slankamenac K, Muller MK, Wildi S, Metzger U, Schmid W et al. Delaying surgery to perform CT scans for suspected appendicitis decreases the rate of negative appendectomies without increasing the rate of perforation nor postoperative complications. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2016;401:643–649
    1. Rhea JT, Halpern EF, Ptak T, Lawrason JN, Sacknoff R, Novelline RA. The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1802–1808
    1. Raman SS, Osuagwu FC, Kadell B, Cryer H, Sayre J, Lu DSK. Effect of CT on false positive diagnosis of appendicitis and perforation. N Engl J Med 2008;358:972–973
    1. Wagner PL, Eachempati SR, Soe K, Pieracci FM, Shou J, Barie PS. Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: for whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact? Surgery 2008;144:276–282

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere