Measurement of superficial and deep abdominal muscle thickness: an ultrasonography study

Nahid Tahan, Khosro Khademi-Kalantari, Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei, Saeed Mikaili, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Shapour Jaberzadeh, Nahid Tahan, Khosro Khademi-Kalantari, Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei, Saeed Mikaili, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Shapour Jaberzadeh

Abstract

Background: Real-time ultrasound imaging is a valid method in the field of rehabilitation. The ultrasound imaging allows direct visualization for real-time study of the muscles as they contract over the time. Measuring of the size of each abdominal muscle in relation to the others provides useful information about the differences in structure, as well as data on trunk muscle activation patterns. The purpose of this study was to assess the size and symmetry of the abdominal muscles at rest in healthy adults and to provide a reference range of absolute abdominal muscle size in a relatively large population.

Method: A total 156 healthy subjects with the age range of 18-44 years were randomly recruited. The thickness of internal oblique, external oblique, transverse abdominis, and rectus abdominis muscles was measured at rest on both right and left sides using ultrasound. Independent t test was used to compare the mean thickness of each abdominal muscle between males and females. Differences on side-to-side thicknesses were assessed using paired t test. The association between abdominal muscle thicknesses with gender and anthropometric variables was examined using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: A normal pattern of increasing order of mean abdominal muscle thickness was found in both genders at both right and left sides: transverse abdominis < external oblique < internal oblique < rectus abdominis. There was a significant difference on the size of transverse abdominis, internal oblique, and external oblique muscles between right and left sides in both genders. Males had significantly thicker abdominal muscles than females. Age was significantly correlated with the thickness of internal oblique, external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles. Body mass index was also positively correlated with muscle thickness of rectus abdominis and external oblique.

Conclusions: The results provide a normal reference range for the abdominal muscles in healthy subjects and may be used as an index to find out abnormalities and also to evaluate the effectiveness of different interventions.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An ultrasound imaging of the lateral abdominal wall muscles taken during resting state. TrA transversus abdominis, IO internal oblique, EO external oblique

References

    1. Gardner-Morse MG, Stokes IA. The effects of abdominal muscle coactivation on lumbar spine stability. Spine. 1998;23(1):86–91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199801010-00019.
    1. Tesh K, Dunn JS, Evans J. The abdominal muscles and vertebral stability. Spine. 1987;12(5):501–8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198706000-00014.
    1. Hides JA, Stanton WR, Freke M, Wilson S, McMahon S, Richardson CA. MRI study of the size, symmetry and function of the trunk muscles among elite cricketers with and without low back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(10):809–13. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.044024.
    1. Hildenbrand K, Noble L. Abdominal muscle activity while performing trunk-flexion exercises using the Ab Roller, ABslide, FitBall, and conventionally performed trunk curls. J Athl Train. 2004;39(1):37.
    1. Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Mattacola CG, Nitz AJ, Malone TR. A comparison of select trunk muscle thickness change between subjects with low back pain classified in the treatment-based classification system and asymptomatic controls. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(10):596–607. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2574.
    1. Linek P, Saulicz E, Wolny T, Myśliwiec A, Kokosz M. Lateral abdominal muscle size at rest and during abdominal drawing-in manoeuvre in healthy adolescents. Man Ther. 2015;20(1):117–23. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.009.
    1. Rankin G, Stokes M, Newham DJ. Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve. 2006;34(3):320–6. doi: 10.1002/mus.20589.
    1. Springer BA, Mielcarek BJ, Nesfield TK, Teyhen DS. Relationships among lateral abdominal muscles, gender, body mass index, and hand dominance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(5):289–97. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2217.
    1. Valentin S, Licka T, Elliott J. Age and side-related morphometric MRI evaluation of trunk muscles in people without back pain. Man Ther. 2015;20(1):90–5. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.007.
    1. Håggmark T, Jansson E, Svane B. Cross-sectional area of the thigh muscle in man measured by computed tomography. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1978;38(4):355–60. doi: 10.3109/00365517809108434.
    1. Hasselager R, Gögenur I. Core muscle size assessed by perioperative abdominal CT scan is related to mortality, postoperative complications, and hospitalization after major abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2014;399(3):287–95. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1174-x.
    1. Arab AM, Rasouli O, Amiri M, Tahan N. Reliability of ultrasound measurement of automatic activity of the abdominal muscle in participants with and without chronic low back pain. Chiropr Man Ther. 2013;21(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-37.
    1. Koppenhaver SL, Hebert JJ, Parent EC, Fritz JM. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging is a valid measure of trunk muscle size and activation during most isometric sub-maximal contractions: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(3):153–69. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70076-5.
    1. Tahan N, Rasouli O, Arab AM, Khademi K, Samani EN. Reliability of the ultrasound measurements of abdominal muscles activity when activated with and without pelvic floor muscles contraction. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(3):339–47.
    1. Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Contraction of the abdominal muscles associated with movement of the lower limb. Phys Ther. 1997;77(2):132–42.
    1. Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Relationship between limb movement speed and associated contraction of the trunk muscles. Ergonomics. 1997;40(11):1220–30. doi: 10.1080/001401397187469.
    1. Tahan N, Arab AM, Arzani P, Rahimi F. Relationship between ultrasonography and electromyography measurement of abdominal muscles when activated with and without pelvis floor muscles contraction. Minerva Med. 2013;104(6):625–30.
    1. Stetts DM, Freund JE, Allison SC, Carpenter G. A rehabilitative ultrasound imaging investigation of lateral abdominal muscle thickness in healthy aging adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(2):16–22. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200932020-00004.
    1. Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Gubler D, Gorelick M, O’Riordan D, Loupas T, et al. Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: an assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(4):494–501. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0589-x.
    1. Bunce SM, Hough AD, Moore AP. Measurement of abdominal muscle thickness using M-mode ultrasound imaging during functional activities. Man Ther. 2004;9(1):41–4. doi: 10.1016/S1356-689X(03)00069-9.
    1. Ota M, Ikezoe T, Kaneoka K, Ichihashi N. Age-related changes in the thickness of the deep and superficial abdominal muscles in women. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;55(2):e26–e30. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.03.007.
    1. Hodges PW. Is there a role for transversus abdominis in lumbo-pelvic stability? Man Ther. 1999;4(2):74–86. doi: 10.1054/math.1999.0169.
    1. Cholewicki J, Panjabi MM, Khachatryan A. Stabilizing function of trunk flexor‐extensor muscles around a neutral spine posture. Spine. 1997;22(19):2207–12. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199710010-00003.
    1. Häggmark T, Thorstensson A. Fibre types in human abdominal muscles. Acta Physiol Scand. 1979;107(4):319–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1979.tb06482.x.
    1. Jahromi S, Atwood H. Correlation of structure, speed of contraction, and total tension in fast and slow abdominal muscle fibers of the lobster (Homarus americanus) J Exp Zool. 1969;171(1):25–37. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401710105.
    1. Johnson MA, Polgar J, Weightman D, Appleton D. Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles: an autopsy study. J Neurol Sci. 1973;18(1):111–29. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(73)90023-3.
    1. Sato T, Akatsuka H, Kito K, Tokoro Y, Tauchi H, Kato K. Age changes in size and number of muscle fibers in human minor pectoral muscle. Mech Ageing Dev. 1984;28(1):99–109. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(84)90156-8.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere