Impact of sexual intercourse on frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes: a randomized controlled trial

Jin-Wei Hou, Li-Hua Yuan, Xian-Ling Cao, Jing-Yan Song, Zhen-Gao Sun, Jin-Wei Hou, Li-Hua Yuan, Xian-Ling Cao, Jing-Yan Song, Zhen-Gao Sun

Abstract

Background: Exposure of the female reproductive tract to either seminal plasma or fluid component of the ejaculate is beneficial to achieving successful embryo implantation and normal embryo development. But whether the "physical" component of sexual intercourse during the peri-transfer period have any influence on frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) pregnancy outcomes is not clear.

Methods: We conducted a randomized trial that included 223 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment at a university-affiliated reproductive center from 19 July 2018 to 24 February 2019. Enrolled patients undergoing IVF treatment were randomized either to engage sexual intercourse using the barrier contraception (Group A, n = 116) or to abstain (Group B, n = 107) one night before FET. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate.

Results: Patients having intercourse had higher clinical pregnancy rate (51.72% vs. 37.07%, P = 0.045) and implantation rate (38.31% vs. 24.77%, P = 0.005) compared to those did not engage intercourse. However, there was no significant difference of the spontaneous abortion rate between two groups (11.67% 33 vs. 14.63%, P = 0.662).

Conclusions: Sexual intercourse before embryo transfer may improve the clinical pregnancy and implantation rates during FET cycles. However, it should be noted that patients choose only one time for sexual intercourse, that is, the night before embryo transfer.

Trial registration: The present study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/ , ChiCTR1800017209).

Keywords: Barrier contraception; Frozen thawed embryo transfer; In vitro fertilization; Pregnancy outcomes; Sexual intercourse.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of individuals selection

References

    1. Robertson SA, Sharkey DJ. Seminal fluid and fertility in women. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:511–519. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1101.
    1. Fanchin R, Harmas A, Benaoudia F, Lundkvist U, Olivennes F, Frydman R. Microbial flora of the cervix assessed at the time of embryo transfer adversely affects in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:866–870. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00277-5.
    1. Naeye RL. Coitus and associated amniotic-fluid infections. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:1198–1200. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197911293012202.
    1. Fox CA, Wolff HS, Baker JA. Measurement of intra-vaginal and intra-uterine pressures during human coitus by radio-telemetry. J Reprod Fertil. 1970;22:243–251. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0220243.
    1. Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1968–1974. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1968.
    1. WS O, Chen HQ, Chow PH. Effects of male accessory sex gland secretions on early embryonic development in the golden hamster. J Reprod Fertil. 1988;84:341–344. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0840341.
    1. Pang SF, Chow PH, Wong TM. The role of the seminal vesicles, coagulating glands and prostate glands on the fertility and fecundity of mice. J Reprod Fertil. 1979;56:129–132. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0560129.
    1. Queen K, Dhabuwala CB, Pierrepoint CG. The effect of the removal of the various accessory sex glands on the fertility of male rats. J Reprod Fertil. 1981;62:423–426. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0620423.
    1. Carp HJ, Serr DM, Mashiach S, Nebel L. Influence of insemination on the implantation of transferred rat blastocysts. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1984;18:194–198. doi: 10.1159/000299080.
    1. Tremellen KP, Valbuena D, Landeras J, Ballesteros A, Martinez J, Mendoza S, Norman RJ, Robertson SA, Simón C. The effect of intercourse on pregnancy rates during assisted human reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2653–2658. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.12.2653.
    1. Crawford G, Ray A, Gudi A, Shah A, Homburg R. The role of seminal plasma for improved outcomes during in vitro fertilization treatment: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:275–284. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu052.
    1. Coulam CB, Stern JJ. Effect of seminal plasma on implantation rates. Early Pregnancy. 1995;1:33–36.
    1. Levin RJ. Do women gain anything from coitus apart from pregnancy? Changes in the human female genital tract activated by coitus. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003;29(Suppl 1):59–69. doi: 10.1080/713847134.
    1. Aoki Y, Kumakiri J, Itakura A, et al. Should sexual intercourse be avoided during the embryo transfer cycle? Life-threatening ruptured heterotopic pregnancy after single thawed embryo transfer: case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2017;44:489–491. doi: 10.12891/ceog3647.2017.
    1. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1270–1283. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der037.
    1. Levin RJ, Wylie KR. The g-spot article–some of its limitations. J Sex Med. 2012;9:1955–1956. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02835.x.
    1. Goswamy RK, Williams G, Steptoe PC. Decreased uterine perfusion–a cause of infertility. Hum Reprod. 1988;3:955–959. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136825.
    1. Kurjak A, Kupesic-Urek S, Schulman H, Zalud I. Transvaginal color flow Doppler in the assessment of ovarian and uterine blood flow in infertile women. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:870–873. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54657-3.
    1. Domar AD, Seibel MM, Benson H. The mind/body program for infertility: a new behavioral treatment approach for women with infertility. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:246–249. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53275-0.
    1. Raynal P, Houdeau E. Comparison of the uterine reflex activity during artificial insemination and mating in the ewe. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2004;33:725–733. doi: 10.1016/S0368-2315(04)96634-3.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere