Evaluation of the Sublay Mesh Repair Outcomes in Different Types of Ventral Hernia

Mohamed Issa, Khaled Noureldin, Abdelhamed Elgadi, Ayyat Abdelaziz, Marwa Badawi, Mahmoud Makram, Mohamed Issa, Khaled Noureldin, Abdelhamed Elgadi, Ayyat Abdelaziz, Marwa Badawi, Mahmoud Makram

Abstract

Introduction: Ventral hernia repair is one of the challenging surgical operations over time. Several surgical techniques for mesh repair have been described (onlay, inlay, sublay, and underlay repairs). It is suggested that sublay mesh repair has the lowest recurrence and surgical site infection in open anterior abdominal hernia repair. This study aimed to analyze the pros and cons of the sublay mesh in ventral hernia repair to evaluate the significance of this technique as a treatment modality. Hospital stay, acute postoperative complications, and the recurrence rate were the main areas of investigation.

Methods: A retrospective study on 79 patients with ventral hernias who were operated on with sublay mesh repair between January 2015 and December 2018 was conducted. Patients were admitted through the elective route. The study included fit patients with first-time ventral hernias (primary and incisional). Recurrent hernia, patients with decompensated cardiopulmonary disorders, and bleeding disorders were excluded from the project. The project pro forma includes patient's demographics, operative details, length of stay, postoperative complications, and follow-up up to 12 months.

Results: All patients underwent open mesh repair using the sublay technique. The ventral hernia was five times more common in females than males. The mean age of presentation was 44.8 years old. The mean operating time was 67 minutes and a one-day hospital stay. Paraumblical and incisional hernias represented the majority of cases. The component separation approach was added in three cases (3.7%). Simultaneous cholecystectomy was performed in two cases (2.5%). Only six cases (6.3%) developed wound-related complications, while two cases (2.5%) had a recurrence.

Conclusion: The sublay mesh repair is a perfect choice for the repair of ventral abdominal hernia. It is associated with a smooth and short hospital stay and the least incidence of complications and recurrence.

Keywords: abdomen ventral hernia; component separation technique; incisional ventral hernia; mesh repair; postoperative complications; recurrence rate; sublay meshplasty.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Copyright © 2021, Issa et al.

Figures

Figure 1. Level of dissection above posterior…
Figure 1. Level of dissection above posterior rectus sheath
Figure 2. Closure of the posterior rectus…
Figure 2. Closure of the posterior rectus sheath and mesh positioning
Figure 3. Percentage of ventral hernia varieties
Figure 3. Percentage of ventral hernia varieties
Figure 4. Postoperative complications
Figure 4. Postoperative complications

References

    1. Deciding on optimal approach for ventral hernia repair: laparoscopic or open. Schlosser KA, Arnold MR, Otero J, et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228:54–65.
    1. Suture versus mesh repair in primary and incisional ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mathes T, Walgenbach M, Siegel R. World J Surg. 2016;40:826–835.
    1. Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis. Sajid MS, Bokhari SA, Mallick AS, Cheek E, Baig MK. Am J Surg. 2009;197:64–72.
    1. Mechanical properties of the abdominal wall and biomaterials utilized for hernia repair. Deeken CR, Lake SP. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;74:411–427.
    1. Biomechanics of the front abdominal wall as a potential factor leading to recurrence with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Smietański M, Bury K, Tomaszewska A, Lubowiecka I, Szymczak C. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1461–1467.
    1. Predictors of mesh explantation after incisional hernia repair. Hawn MT, Gray SH, Snyder CW, Graham LA, Finan KR, Vick CC. Am J Surg. 2011;202:28–33.
    1. Multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study of the recurrence, surgical site infection, and quality of life after contaminated ventral hernia repair using biosynthetic absorbable mesh: the COBRA study. Rosen MJ, Bauer JJ, Harmaty M, et al. Ann Surg. 2017;265:205–211.
    1. Open retromuscular mesh repair of complex incisional hernia: predictors of wound events and recurrence. Cobb WS, Warren JA, Ewing JA, Burnikel A, Merchant M, Carbonell AM. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:606–613.
    1. Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias. White TJ, Santos MC, Thompson JS. . Am Surg. 1998;64:276–280.
    1. Mesh infection in ventral incisional hernia repair: incidence, contributing factors, and treatment. Sanchez VM, Abi-Haidar YE, Itani KM. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2011;12:205–210.
    1. Evaluation of “sublay” and “onlay” mesh hernioplasty techniques of ventral hernia repair. Al-Tai AH. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10:327–331.
    1. Retro-rectus placement of bio-absorbable mesh improves patient outcomes. Cho JE, Helm MC, Helm JH, Mier N, Kastenmeier AS, Gould JC, Goldblatt MI. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:2629–2634.
    1. Preperitoneal versus retromuscular mesh repair for ventral abdominal hernias: a propensity matched analysis. Dougaz MW, Chaouch MA, Cherni S, et al. Indian J Surg. 2020;82:868–873.
    1. Antibiotic irrigation of the surgical site decreases incidence of surgical site infection after open ventral hernia repair. Fatula LK, Nelson A, Abbad H, et al. Am Surg. 2018;84:1146–1151.
    1. Ventral hernia: patient selection, treatment, and management. Holihan JL, Alawadi ZM, Harris JW, et al. Curr Probl Surg. 2016;53:307–354.
    1. A decade of experience with laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs. Lund S, Farley D. Am J Surg. 2019;217:546–549.
    1. The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample. Khorgami Z, Li WT, Jackson TN, Howard CA, Sclabas GM. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:2217–2221.
    1. What is the current knowledge about sublay/retro-rectus repair of incisional hernias? Köckerling F, Schug-Pass C, Scheuerlein H. Front Surg. 2018;5:47.
    1. Sublay versus onlay mesh repair of ventral hernia. [ Dec; 2021 ]; 2013
    1. Open onlay versus sublay mesh repair in ventral hernias - a comparative study. [ Dec; 2021 ]; 2021
    1. Meta-analysis of sublay versus onlay mesh repair in incisional hernia surgery. Timmermans L, de Goede B, van Dijk SM, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Am J Surg. 2014;207:980–988.
    1. Outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with routine defect closure using "shoelacing" technique. Orenstein SB, Dumeer JL, Monteagudo J, Poi MJ, Novitsky YW. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1452–1457.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere