Quantitative T2 magnetic resonance imaging compared to morphological grading of the early cervical intervertebral disc degeneration: an evaluation approach in asymptomatic young adults

Chun Chen, Minghua Huang, Zhihua Han, Lixin Shao, Yan Xie, Jianhong Wu, Yan Zhang, Hongkui Xin, Aijun Ren, Yong Guo, Deli Wang, Qing He, Dike Ruan, Chun Chen, Minghua Huang, Zhihua Han, Lixin Shao, Yan Xie, Jianhong Wu, Yan Zhang, Hongkui Xin, Aijun Ren, Yong Guo, Deli Wang, Qing He, Dike Ruan

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of quantitative T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for quantifying early cervical intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration in asymptomatic young adults by correlating the T2 value with Pfirrmann grade, sex, and anatomic level.

Methods: Seventy asymptomatic young subjects (34 men and 36 women; mean age, 22.80±2.11 yr; range, 18-25 years) underwent 3.0-T MRI to obtain morphological data (one T1-fast spin echo (FSE) and three-plane T2-FSE, used to assign a Pfirrmann grade (I-V)) and for T2 mapping (multi-echo spin echo). T2 values in the nucleus pulposus (NP, n = 350) and anulus fibrosus (AF, n = 700) were obtained. Differences in T2 values between sexes and anatomic level were evaluated, and linear correlation analysis of T2 values versus degenerative grade was conducted.

Findings: Cervical IVDs of healthy young adults were commonly determined to be at Pfirrmann grades I and II. T2 values of NPs were significantly higher than those of AF at all anatomic levels (P<0.000). The NP, anterior AF and posterior AF values did not differ significantly between genders at the same anatomic level (P>0.05). T2 values decreased linearly with degenerative grade. Linear correlation analysis revealed a strong negative association between the Pfirrmann grade and the T2 values of the NP (P = 0.000) but not the T2 values of the AF (P = 0.854). However, non-degenerated discs (Pfirrmann grades I and II) showed a wide range of T2 relaxation time. T2 values according to disc degeneration level classification were as follows: grade I (>62.03 ms), grade II (54.60-62.03 ms), grade III (<54.60 ms).

Conclusions: T2 quantitation provides a more sensitive and robust approach for detecting and characterizing the early stage of cervical IVD degeneration and to create a reliable quantitative in healthy young adults.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. For the representative intervertebral disc,…
Figure 1. For the representative intervertebral disc, regions of interest (ROIs) evaluation on the sagittal T2WI, an ellipse ROI was selected for the nucleus pulposus (NP).
Suitable ROIs for both the anterior and posterior annulus fibrosus (AF) were selected. Then these ROIs in T2WI were copied to the T2 map and T2 colored-map. T2 values were measured.
Figure 2. Box plots of T2 value…
Figure 2. Box plots of T2 value of both nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) according to the anatomic level of each disc.
The boxes represent the median and the interquartile range, with the vertical lines showing the range. *P

Figure 3. Box plots of T2 value…

Figure 3. Box plots of T2 value of nucleus pulposus (NP) by sex according to…

Figure 3. Box plots of T2 value of nucleus pulposus (NP) by sex according to the anatomic level of each disc.
White: Male; Black: Female. The boxes represent the median and the interquartile range, with the vertical lines showing the range.

Figure 4. Box plots of T2 value…

Figure 4. Box plots of T2 value of nucleus pulposus (NP) according to the grade…

Figure 4. Box plots of T2 value of nucleus pulposus (NP) according to the grade of Pfirrmann.
The boxes represent the median and the interquartile range, with the vertical lines showing the range. Three case with Pfirrmann grade IV (T2 value = 36.72) was excluded. *P

Figure 5. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve between…

Figure 5. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve between each grade in the NP and cut-off value.

Figure 5. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve between each grade in the NP and cut-off value.
The most accurate point was obtained from the ROC curve as the cut-off value. A. The T2 cut-off value between grades I and II was found to be 62.03 ms, sensitivity 83.80%, specificity 64.40%, and Area Under curve (AUC) 0.785, separately. B. The values between grades II and III were 54.60 ms, 66.80%, 71.18%, and 0.722, separately.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Hanvold TN, Veiersted KB, Waersted M (2010) A prospective study of neck, shoulder, and upper back pain among technical school students entering working life. J Adolesc Health 46(5): 488–494. - PubMed
    1. McGrath PA (1994) Psychological aspects of pain perception. Arch Oral Biol 39 Suppl55S–62S. - PubMed
    1. Williams FM, Sambrook PN (2011) Neck and back pain and intervertebral disc degeneration: role of occupational factors. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 25(1): 69–79. - PubMed
    1. Okada E, Matsumoto M, Fujiwara H, Toyama Y (2011) Disc degeneration of cervical spine on MRI in patients with lumbar disc herniation: comparison study with asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Spine J 20(4): 585–591. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matsumoto M, Okada E, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, et al. (2013) Tandem age-related lumbar and cervical intervertebral disc changes in asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 22(4): 708–713. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 53 references
MeSH terms
Related information
Grants and funding
No current funding sources for this study.
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 3. Box plots of T2 value…
Figure 3. Box plots of T2 value of nucleus pulposus (NP) by sex according to the anatomic level of each disc.
White: Male; Black: Female. The boxes represent the median and the interquartile range, with the vertical lines showing the range.
Figure 4. Box plots of T2 value…
Figure 4. Box plots of T2 value of nucleus pulposus (NP) according to the grade of Pfirrmann.
The boxes represent the median and the interquartile range, with the vertical lines showing the range. Three case with Pfirrmann grade IV (T2 value = 36.72) was excluded. *P

Figure 5. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve between…

Figure 5. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve between each grade in the NP and cut-off value.

Figure 5. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve between each grade in the NP and cut-off value.
The most accurate point was obtained from the ROC curve as the cut-off value. A. The T2 cut-off value between grades I and II was found to be 62.03 ms, sensitivity 83.80%, specificity 64.40%, and Area Under curve (AUC) 0.785, separately. B. The values between grades II and III were 54.60 ms, 66.80%, 71.18%, and 0.722, separately.
Figure 5. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve between…
Figure 5. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve between each grade in the NP and cut-off value.
The most accurate point was obtained from the ROC curve as the cut-off value. A. The T2 cut-off value between grades I and II was found to be 62.03 ms, sensitivity 83.80%, specificity 64.40%, and Area Under curve (AUC) 0.785, separately. B. The values between grades II and III were 54.60 ms, 66.80%, 71.18%, and 0.722, separately.

References

    1. Hanvold TN, Veiersted KB, Waersted M (2010) A prospective study of neck, shoulder, and upper back pain among technical school students entering working life. J Adolesc Health 46(5): 488–494.
    1. McGrath PA (1994) Psychological aspects of pain perception. Arch Oral Biol 39 Suppl55S–62S.
    1. Williams FM, Sambrook PN (2011) Neck and back pain and intervertebral disc degeneration: role of occupational factors. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 25(1): 69–79.
    1. Okada E, Matsumoto M, Fujiwara H, Toyama Y (2011) Disc degeneration of cervical spine on MRI in patients with lumbar disc herniation: comparison study with asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Spine J 20(4): 585–591.
    1. Matsumoto M, Okada E, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, et al. (2013) Tandem age-related lumbar and cervical intervertebral disc changes in asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 22(4): 708–713.
    1. Trinh K, Cui X, Wang YJ (2010) Chinese herbal medicine for chronic neck pain due to cervical degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(24): 2121–2127.
    1. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(17): 1873–1878.
    1. Chan SC, Gantenbein-Ritter B (2012) Intervertebral disc regeneration or repair with biomaterials and stem cell therapy–feasible or fiction? Swiss Med Wkly 142: w13598.
    1. Chung SA, Wei AQ, Connor DE, Webb GC, Molloy T, et al. (2007) Nucleus pulposus cellular longevity by telomerase gene therapy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(11): 1188–1196.
    1. Xin H, Zhang C, Wang D, Shi Z, Gu T, et al. (2013) Tissue-engineered allograft intervertebral disc transplantation for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: experimental study in a beagle model. Tissue Eng Part A 19(1–2): 143–151.
    1. Haefeli M, Kalberer F, Saegesser D, Nerlich AG, Boos N, et al. (2006) The course of macroscopic degeneration in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(14): 1522–1531.
    1. Yamamoto S, Watanabe A, Nakamura J, Ohtori S, Harada Y, et al. (2011) Quantitative T2 mapping of femoral head cartilage in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with noncollapsed osteonecrosis of the femoral head associated with corticosteroid therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 34(5): 1151–1158.
    1. Souza RB, Baum T, Wu S, Feeley BT, Kadel N, et al. (2012) Effects of unloading on knee articular cartilage T1rho and T2 magnetic resonance imaging relaxation times: a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42(6): 511–520.
    1. Takashima H, Takebayashi T, Yoshimoto M, Terashima Y, Tsuda H, et al. (2012) Correlation between T2 relaxation time and intervertebral disk degeneration. Skeletal Radiol 41(2): 163–7.
    1. Krueger EC, Perry JO, Wu Y, Haughton VM (2007) Changes in T2 relaxation times associated with maturation of the human intervertebral disk. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(7): 1237–1241.
    1. Marinelli NL, Haughton VM, Munoz A, Anderson PA (2009) T2 relaxation times of intervertebral disc tissue correlated with water content and proteoglycan content. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(5): 520–524.
    1. Stelzeneder D, Welsch GH, Kovacs BK, Goed S, Paternostro-Sluga T, et al. (2012) Quantitative T2 evaluation at 3.0T compared to morphological grading of the lumbar intervertebral disc: a standardized evaluation approach in patients with low back pain. Eur J Radiol 81(2): 324–330.
    1. Niu G, Yang J, Wang R, Dang S, Wu EX, et al. (2011) MR imaging assessment of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and age-related changes: apparent diffusion coefficient versus T2 quantitation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(9): 1617–1623.
    1. Trattnig S, Stelzeneder D, Goed S, Reissegger M, Mamisch TC, et al. (2010) Lumbar intervertebral disc abnormalities: comparison of quantitative T2 mapping with conventional MR at 3.0 T. Eur Radiol. 20(11): 2715–2722.
    1. Watanabe A, Benneker LM, Boesch C, Watanabe T, Obata T, et al. (2007) Classification of intervertebral disk degeneration with axial T2 mapping. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(4): 936–942.
    1. Boos N, Weissbach S, Rohrbach H, Weiler C, Spratt KF, et al. (2002) Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo Award in basic science. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(23): 2631–2644.
    1. Stelzeneder D, Messner A, Vlychou M, Welsch GH, Scheurecker G, et al. (2011) Quantitative in vivo MRI evaluation of lumbar facet joints and intervertebral discs using axial T2 mapping. Eur Radiol 21(11): 2388–2395.
    1. Siivola SM, Levoska S, Tervonen O, Ilkko E, Vanharanta H, et al. (2002) MRI changes of cervical spine in asymptomatic and symptomatic young adults. Eur Spine J 11(4): 358–63.
    1. Ludescher B, Effelsberg J, Martirosian P, Steidle G, Markert B, et al. (2008) T2- and diffusion-maps reveal diurnal changes of intervertebral disc composition: an in vivo MRI study at 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 28(1): 252–257.
    1. Wang YX, Zhao F, Griffith JF, Mok GS, Leung JC, et al. (2013) T1rho and T2 relaxation times for lumbar disc degeneration: an in vivo comparative study at 3.0-Tesla MRI. Eur Radiol 23(1): 228–234.
    1. Nagashima M, Abe H, Amaya K, Matsumoto H, Yanaihara H, et al. (2012) A method for quantifying intervertebral disc signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging. Acta Radiol 53(9): 1059–1065.
    1. Weiler C, Schietzsch M, Kirchner T, Nerlich AG, Boos N, et al. (2012) Age-related changes in human cervical, thoracal and lumbar intervertebral disc exhibit a strong intra-individual correlation. Eur Spine J Suppl 6: S810–818.
    1. Hoppe S, Quirbach S, Mamisch TC, Krause FG, Werlen S, et al. (2012) Axial T2 mapping in intervertebral discs: a new technique for assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Radiol 22(9): 2013–2019.
    1. Xinhua J, Jianyu C, Zhaoxi C, Biling L, Jinglian Z, et al. (2009) The correaltion between the MRI-DTI-ADC/FA value and age, anatomic location of healthy volunteers lumbar intervertebral discs. Chin J CT and MRI 7(6): 1–5.
    1. Takatalo J, Karppinen J, Niinimaki J, Taimela S, Nayha S, et al. (2009) Prevalence of degenerative imaging findings in lumbar magnetic resonance imaging among young adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(16): 1716–1721.
    1. Binyi T, Zuolun Z, Zelong Y, Xixin Y, Dachuang W (2000) Biochemical study on cervical intervertebral disc. Orthop J Chin 7(7): 642–644.
    1. Sivan SS, Tsitron E, Wachtel E, Roughley P, Sakkee N, et al. (2006) Age-related accumulation of pentosidine in aggrecan and collagen from normal and degenerate human intervertebral discs. Biochem J 399(1): 29–35.
    1. Singh K, Masuda K, Thonar EJ, An HS, Cs-Szabo G (2009) Age-related changes in the extracellular matrix of nucleus pulposus and anulus fibrosus of human intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(1): 10–16.
    1. Buckwalter JA (1995) Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(11): 1307–1314.
    1. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, Raininko R, Viikari-Juntura E, et al. (2000) Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(4): 487–492.
    1. An HS, Anderson PA, Haughton VM, Iatridis JC, Kang JD, et al. (2004) Introduction: disc degeneration: summary. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(23): 2677–2678.
    1. Blumenkrantz G, Zuo J, Li X, Kornak J, Link TM, et al. (2010) In vivo 3.0-tesla magnetic resonance T1rho and T2 relaxation mapping in subjects with intervertebral disc degeneration and clinical symptoms. Magn Reson Med 63(5): 1193–1200.
    1. Scott JE, Bosworth TR, Cribb AM, Taylor JR (1994) The chemical morphology of age-related changes in human intervertebral disc glycosaminoglycans from cervical, thoracic and lumbar nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus. J Anat 184 (Pt 1): 73–82.
    1. Morishita Y, Hida S, Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Zou J, et al. (2008) The effects of the degenerative changes in the functional spinal unit on the kinematics of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(6): E178–182.
    1. Boijsen E (1954) The cervical spinal canal in intraspinal expansive processes. Acta radiol 42(2): 101–115.
    1. Furusawa N, Baba H, Miyoshi N, Maezawa Y, Uchida K, et al. (2001) Herniation of cervical intervertebral disc: immunohistochemical examination and measurement of nitric oxide production. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(10): 1110–1116.
    1. Chiu EJ, Newitt DC, Segal MR, Hu SS, Lotz JC, et al. (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of relaxation and water diffusion in the human lumbar intervertebral disc under compression in vitro. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(19): E437–444.
    1. Zou J, Yang H, Miyazaki M, Morishita Y, Wei F, et al. (2009) Dynamic bulging of intervertebral discs in the degenerative lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(23): 2545–2550.
    1. Perry J, Haughton V, Anderson PA, Wu Y, Fine J, et al. (2006) The value of T2 relaxation times to characterize lumbar intervertebral disks: preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(2): 337–42.
    1. Karakida O, Ueda H, Ueda M, Miyasaka T (2003) Diurnal T2 value changes in the lumbar intervertebral discs. Clin Radiol 58(5): 389–392.
    1. Urban JP, Smith S, Fairbank JC (2004) Nutrition of the intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(23): 2700–9.
    1. Marinelli NL, Haughton VM, Anderson PA (2010) T2 relaxation times correlated with stage of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and patient age. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(7): 1278–1282.
    1. Sowa G, Vadala G, Studer R, Kompel J, Iucu C, et al. (2008) Characterization of intervertebral disc aging: longitudinal analysis of a rabbit model by magnetic resonance imaging, histology, and gene expression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(17): 1821–1828.
    1. Wu N, Liu H, Chen J, Zhao L, Zuo W, et al. (2013) Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2 relaxation time variation patterns in assessment of age and disc level related intervertebral disc changes. PLoS One 8: e69052.
    1. Zobel BB, Vadala G, Del Vescovo R, Battisti S, Martina FM, et al. (2012) T1rho magnetic resonance imaging quantification of early lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in healthy young adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(14): 1224–1230.
    1. Matsumura Y, Kasai Y, Obata H, Matsushima S, Inaba T, et al. (2009) Changes in water content of intervertebral discs and paravertebral muscles before and after bed rest. J Orthop Sci 14(1): 45–50.
    1. Ellingson AM, Mehta H, Polly DW Jr, Ellermann J, Nuckley DJ (2013) Disc Degeneration Assessed by Quantitative T2* (T2 star) Correlated With Functional Lumbar Mechanics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(24): E1533–40.
    1. Welsch GH, Trattnig S, Paternostro-Sluga T, Bohndorf K, Goed S, et al. (2011) Parametric T2 and T2* mapping techniques to visualize intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with low back pain: initial results on the clinical use of 3.0 Tesla MRI. Skeletal Radiol 40(5): 543–551.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere