Does Adding Social Cognitive Remediation Therapy to Neurocognitive Remediation Therapy Improve Outcomes in Young People With a Severe Mental Illness?-The Advantage Trial

Anthony W F Harris, Michelle Kightley, Joanna Williams, Cassandra Ma, Carlie Dodds, Anthony W F Harris, Michelle Kightley, Joanna Williams, Cassandra Ma, Carlie Dodds

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive impairments are a common and significant issue for young people with a severe mental illness. Young people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression all experience significant cognitive problems that impede their ability to return to work or study. These neurocognitive problems are frequently exacerbated by social cognitive deficits that interfere with their ability to integrate into the community and understand the social and emotional nuances about them. This study aimed to assess if the addition of a social cognitive remediation treatment to a neurocognitive remediation therapy improved functional outcome.

Methods: Five youth mental health services were trained in both the Neuropsychological Educational Approach to Remediation (NEAR) and the Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT) treatments. Participants were randomised between receiving either NEAR + SCIT or NEAR + treatment as usual (TAU) over a 20-week period, with all participants receiving the NEAR treatment first. Symptoms, neurocognition, social cognition and functioning were examined at baseline, end of treatment and at 3 months follow-up and compared between the two arms of the study. The primary outcome was function.

Results: Thirty-nine participants were randomised to treatment (Schizophrenia spectrum = 28, Bipolar disorder = 7, Major Depression = 2). The trial was curtailed by Covid-related service restrictions. There was an overall significant improvement in function over time with a trend towards a greater improvement in the NEAR + SCIT arm. No changes in symptoms, neurocognitive or social cognitive measures were seen. While 74% completed treatment only 49% agreed to follow up at 3 months affecting our ability to interpret the findings. Attrition did not differ by arm.

Conclusions: In a pragmatic, service-based research project, treatment aimed at improving cognition enhanced functional outcome in young people with a range of severe mental illnesses. There was a trend towards improved function in young people who had a combined NEAR + SCIT approach.

Clinical trial registration: Identifier: ACTRN12622000192785.

Keywords: bipolar disorder; cognitive remediation; community function; outcome; schizophrenia; social cognition; social cognition rehabilitation; youth mental health.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Harris, Kightley, Williams, Ma and Dodds.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT Diagram of the Advantage Trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) scores means (SEMs) as baseline, post-treatment, and follow-up. Asterisk indicated significant main effect of time from baseline to follow-up, but there were no differences between groups and interaction.

References

    1. Heinrichs RW, Zakzanis KK. Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: a quantitative review of the evidence. Neuropsychology. (1998) 12:426–45. 10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.426
    1. Mesholam-Gately R, Giuliano AJ, Goff KP, Faraone SV, Seidman LJ. Neurocognition in first-episode schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology. (2009) 23:315–36. 10.1037/a0014708
    1. Bora E, Yucel M, Pantelis C. Theory of mindX impairment in schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. (2009) 109:1–9. 10.1016/j.schres.2008.12.020
    1. Cotter J, Granger K, Backx R, Hobbs M, Looi CY, Barnett JH. Social cognitive dysfunction as a clinical marker: a systematic review of meta-analyses across 30 clinical conditions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2018) 84:92–9. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.014
    1. Green MF. Impact of cognitive and social cognitive impairment on functional outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. (2016) 77(Suppl. 2):8–11. 10.4088/JCP.14074su1c.02
    1. Halverson TF, Orleans-Pobee M, Merritt C, Sheeran P, Fett A-K, Penn DL. Pathways to functional outcomes in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: meta-analysis of social cognitive and neurocognitive predictors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2019) 105:212–9. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.020
    1. Nielsen RE, Levander S, Kjaersdam Telléus G, Jensen SO, Østergaard Christensen T, Leucht S. Second-generation antipsychotic effect on cognition in patients with schizophrenia–a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2015) 131:185–96. 10.1111/acps.12374
    1. Vita A, Barlati S, Ceraso A, Nibbio G, Ariu C, Deste G, et al. . Effectiveness, core elements, and moderators of response of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Psychiatry. (2021) 78:848–58. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0620
    1. Roelofs RL, Wingbermühle E, Egger JIM, Kessels RPC. Social cognitive interventions in neuropsychiatric patients: a meta-analysis. Brain Impair. (2017) 18:138–73. 10.1017/BrImp.2016.31
    1. van Duin D, de Winter L, Oud M, Kroon H, Veling W, van Weeghel J. The effect of rehabilitation combined with cognitive remediation on functioning in persons with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. (2019) 49:1414–25. 10.1017/S003329171800418X
    1. Fett A-KJ, Viechtbauer W, Dominguez M-d-G, Penn DL, van Os J, Krabbendam L. The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2011) 35:573–88. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.001
    1. Gard DE, Fisher M, Garrett C, Genevsky A, Vinogradov S. Motivation and its relationship to neurocognition, social cognition, and functional outcome in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. (2009) 115:74–81. 10.1016/j.schres.2009.08.015
    1. Horan WP, Kern RS, Tripp C, Hellemann G, Wynn JK, Bell M, et al. . Efficacy and specificity of Social Cognitive Skills Training for outpatients with psychotic disorders. J Psychiatric Res. (2011) 45:1113–22. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.01.015
    1. Lindenmayer J-P, McGurk SR, Khan A, Kaushik S, Thanju A, Hoffman L, et al. . Improving social cognition in schizophrenia: a pilot intervention combining computerized social cognition training with cognitive remediation. Schizophr Bull. (2013) 39:507–17. 10.1093/schbul/sbs120
    1. Lindenmayer J-P, Khan A, McGurk SR, Kulsa MKC, Ljuri I, Ozog V, et al. . Does social cognition training augment response to computer-assisted cognitive remediation for schizophrenia? Schizophr Res. (2018) 201:180–6. 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.012
    1. Fisher M, Nahum M, Howard E, Rowlands A, Brandrett B, Kermott A, et al. . Supplementing intensive targeted computerized cognitive training with social cognitive exercises for people with schizophrenia: an interim report. Psychiatr Rehabil J. (2017) 40:21–32. 10.1037/prj0000244
    1. Medalia A, Revheim N, Herlands T. Cognitive Remediation for Psychological Disorders: Therapist Guide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; (2009). p. 1–176.
    1. Combs DR, Adams SD, Penn DL, Roberts D, Tiegreen J, Stem P. Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT) for inpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: preliminary findings. Schizophr Res. (2007) 91:112–6. 10.1016/j.schres.2006.12.010
    1. Østergaard SD, Lemming OM, Mors O, Correll CU, Bech P. PANSS-6: a brief rating scale for the measurement of severity in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2016) 133:436–44. 10.1111/acps.12526
    1. Addington D, Addington J, Maticka-Tyndale E. Assessing depression in schizophrenia: the Calgary Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. (1993) 163 (Suppl. 22):39–44. 10.1192/S0007125000292581
    1. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Sydney, NSW: Psychology Foundation; (1995).
    1. Wechsler D. WASI-II: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. PsychCorp: (2011).
    1. Randolph C. RBANS Update : Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson; (2012).
    1. Corcoran R, Mercer G, Frith CD. Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: investigating “theory of mind” in people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. (1995) 17:5–13. 10.1016/0920-9964(95)00024-G
    1. Kohler CG, Turner TH, Bilker WB, Brensinger CM, Siegel SJ, Kanes SJ, et al. . Facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia: intensity effects and error pattern. Am J Psychiatry. (2003) 160:1768–74. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.10.1768
    1. Combs DR, Penn DL, Wicher M, Waldheter E. The Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ): a new measure for evaluating hostile social-cognitive biases in paranoia. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. (2007) 12:128–43. 10.1080/13546800600787854
    1. Rybarczyk B. Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). In: Kreutzer JS, DeLuca J, Caplan B. editors. Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. New York, NY: Springer New York; (2011). p. 2313.
    1. Stewart G, Sara G, Harris M, Waghorn G, Hall A, Sivarajasingam S, et al. . A brief measure of vocational activity and community participation: development and reliability of the Activity and Participation Questionnaire. Australian N Zeal J Psychiatry. (2010) 44:258–66. 10.3109/00048670903487175
    1. Richardson J, Iezzi A, Khan MA, Maxwell A. Validity and reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D multi-attribute utility instrument. Patient. (2014) 7:85–96. 10.1007/s40271-013-0036-x
    1. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics. 26.0 ed. Armonk, NY.: IBM Corporation; (2019).
    1. Fernandez-Gonzalo S, Turon M, Jodar M, Pousa E, Hernandez Rambla C, García R, et al. . A new computerized cognitive and social cognition training specifically designed for patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder in early stages of illness: a pilot study. Psychiatry Res. (2015) 228:501–9. 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.007
    1. Peña J, Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Sánchez P, Iriarte MB, Elizagarate E, Garay MA, et al. . Combining social cognitive treatment, cognitive remediation, and functional skills training in schizophrenia: a randomized controlled trial. NPJ Schizophr. (2016) 2:16037. 10.1038/npjschz.2016.37
    1. Samara MT, Engel RR, Millier A, Kandenwein J, Toumi M, Leucht S. Equipercentile linking of scales measuring functioning and symptoms: examining the GAF, SOFAS, CGI-S, and PANSS. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2014) 24:1767–72. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.08.009
    1. Deste G, Barlati S, Galluzzo A, Corsini P, Valsecchi P, Turrina C, et al. . Effectiveness of cognitive remediation in early versus chronic schizophrenia: a preliminary report. Front Psychiatry. (2019) 10:236. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00236
    1. Wojtalik JA, Mesholam-Gately RI, Hogarty SS, Greenwald DP, Litschge MY, Sandoval LR, et al. . Confirmatory efficacy of cognitive enhancement therapy for early schizophrenia: results from a multisite randomized trial. Psychiatr Serv. (2021) 0:appi.ps.202000552. 10.1176/appi.ps.202000552
    1. Vidarsdottir OG, Roberts DL, Twamley EW, Gudmundsdottir B, Sigurdsson E, Magnusdottir BB. Integrative cognitive remediation for early psychosis: results from a randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Research. (2019) 273:690–8. 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.007
    1. Loughland CM, Lewin TJ, Carr VJ, Sheedy J, Harris AW. RBANS neuropsychological profiles within schizophrenia samples recruited from non-clinical settings. Schizophr Res. (2007) 89:232–42. 10.1016/j.schres.2006.08.022
    1. Revell ER, Neill JC, Harte M, Khan Z, Drake RJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in early schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. (2015) 168:213–22. 10.1016/j.schres.2015.08.017
    1. Jääskeläinen E, Juola P, Hirvonen N, McGrath JJ, Saha S, Isohanni M, et al. . A systematic review and meta-analysis of recovery in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. (2013) 39:1296–306. 10.1093/schbul/sbs130
    1. Mucci A, Galderisi S, Gibertoni D, Rossi A, Rocca P, Bertolino A, et al. . Factors associated with real-life functioning in persons with schizophrenia in a 4-year follow-up study of the Italian Network for research on psychoses. JAMA Psychiatry. (2021) 78:550–9. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4614
    1. Hajdúk M, Penn DL, Harvey PD, Pinkham AE. Social cognition, neurocognition, symptomatology, functional competences and outcomes in people with schizophrenia – a network analysis perspective. J Psychiatr Res. (2021) 144:8–13. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.041
    1. Galderisi S, Rucci P, Mucci A, Rossi A, Rocca P, Bertolino A, et al. . The interplay among psychopathology, personal resources, context-related factors and real-life functioning in schizophrenia: stability in relationships after 4 years and differences in network structure between recovered and non-recovered patients. World Psychiatry. (2020) 19:81–91. 10.1002/wps.20700
    1. Green MF, Schooler NR, Kern RS, Frese FJ, Granberry W, Harvery PD, et al. . Evaluation of functionally meaningful measures for clinical trials of cognition enhancement in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. (2011) 168:400–7. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10030414

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere