The amplitude of fNIRS hemodynamic response in the visual cortex unmasks autistic traits in typically developing children

Raffaele Mazziotti, Elena Scaffei, Eugenia Conti, Viviana Marchi, Riccardo Rizzi, Giovanni Cioni, Roberta Battini, Laura Baroncelli, Raffaele Mazziotti, Elena Scaffei, Eugenia Conti, Viviana Marchi, Riccardo Rizzi, Giovanni Cioni, Roberta Battini, Laura Baroncelli

Abstract

Autistic traits represent a continuum dimension across the population, with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) being the extreme end of the distribution. Accumulating evidence shows that neuroanatomical and neurofunctional profiles described in relatives of ASD individuals reflect an intermediate neurobiological pattern between the clinical population and healthy controls. This suggests that quantitative measures detecting autistic traits in the general population represent potential candidates for the development of biomarkers identifying early pathophysiological processes associated with ASD. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has been extensively employed to investigate neural development and function. In contrast, the potential of fNIRS to define reliable biomarkers of brain activity has been barely explored. Features of non-invasiveness, portability, ease of administration, and low-operating costs make fNIRS a suitable instrument to assess brain function for differential diagnosis, follow-up, analysis of treatment outcomes, and personalized medicine in several neurological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel standardized procedure with high entertaining value to measure hemodynamic responses (HDR) in the occipital cortex of adult subjects and children. We found that the variability of evoked HDR correlates with the autistic traits of children, assessed by the Autism-Spectrum Quotient. Interestingly, HDR amplitude was especially linked to social and communication features, representing the core symptoms of ASD. These findings establish a quick and easy strategy for measuring visually-evoked cortical activity with fNIRS that optimize the compliance of young subjects, setting the background for testing the diagnostic value of fNIRS visual measurements in the ASD clinical population.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1. Visual stimulation and experimental paradigm.
Fig. 1. Visual stimulation and experimental paradigm.
A Representative frame of baseline grey screen (upper row, stimulus ‘off’) and reversing checkerboard (lower row, stimulus ‘on’) for RS condition. The small black square indicates the fixation point. B Representative frame of low-contrast (20%) grey-scale baseline animated cartoon (upper row, stimulus ‘off’) and blended checkerboard-cartoon (lower row, stimulus ‘on’) for Cartoon-Fixed (CF) and Cartoon Chosen (CC) conditions. C Representative HDR in the occipital cortex during the stimulus ‘off’ (upper row) and stimulus ‘on’ activation phase (lower row) according to the output of nirsLAB software. The Look Up table is reported under the images. D Experimental protocol showing that the cycles of visual stimulation were structured in blocks of 40 trials (20 trials with the reversing checkerboard and 20 trials with the ‘mock’ stimulus) for a total duration of 10 min.
Fig. 2. HDR was reliably detected in…
Fig. 2. HDR was reliably detected in adults using both RS and blended RS-animated cartoons.
For all panels, values in the y-axis are multiplied for 10^4. A On the left, the average time course for THb (green line), OHb (red line), and DHb (blue line) in response to the Radial Simulus (RS) are shown. The three plots on the right depict the average peak response to the stimulus (S) vs. the blank (B) across all the adult subjects. The stimulus-driven signal was significantly different from the blank for all the conditions (t-test, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). B Same plots as above for the Cartoon Fixed (CF) condition. On the left, the average time course of the evoked HDR is depicted. On the right, the graphs showed that the HDR amplitude was significantly higher in response to S with respect to B for THb, OHb, and DHb (t-test, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). C Cartoon Chosen (CC) condition. Also in this case the S elicited significantly higher responses for THb, OHb, and DHb with respect to the B (t-test, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). D Comparison among different visual stimulations shows no differences in evoked amplitudes for THb, whereas a significant difference was detected between RS and CC for OHb (One-way RM ANOVA, p < 0.01, post hoc BH-FDR, RS vs. CC p < 0.01) and a more complex pattern of differences emerged for DHb (One-way RM ANOVA, p < 0.001, post hoc BH-FDR, RS vs. CF p < 0.01, RS vs. CC p < 0.001, CF vs CC p < 0.05). E No differences of evoked responses were detected with different contrast levels of the baseline movie (L: low, M: medium, H: high). For statistical metrics and details, refer to Table S1. Data are shown as average ± s.e.m. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Fig. 3. HDR signal was reliably detected…
Fig. 3. HDR signal was reliably detected in children using blended RS-animated cartoons with low and high contrast.
For all panels, values in the y-axis are multiplied for 10^4. A On the left, the average time course for THb (green line), OHb (red line), and DHb (blue line) in response to high-contrast (80%) blended RS-animated cartoons is shown (CH1). On the right, the graphs represent the average amplitude of the evoked HDR following the stimulus (S) and the blank (B). A significantly different response to S with respect to the B was detectable for all metrics (t-test, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). B The average time course of the HDR to low-contrast (20%) blended RS-animated cartoons is shown (CL1). Here, the baseline cartoon is the same as the experiment described in panel (A), but a different part of the movie was used. THb, OHb, and DHb showed a significantly higher deflection to the S with respect to the B in this condition as well (t-test, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). C On the left, the average time course of HDR following the second low-contrast blended RS-animated cartoon selected by the subject (CL2). On the right, the analysis of peak amplitudes revealed significantly higher responses during S compared to B for THb, OHb, and DHb (t-test, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). D Comparison among different contrast levels of the baseline cartoon revealed no differences in the amplitude of HDR. E Response amplitudes for low-contrast blended RS-animated cartoons in adults and children. More specifically, we compared the response to CF condition of adults with CL1 condition for children. The average amplitude of HDR was significantly higher in children (t-test, p < 0.001 for THb, p < 0.05 for OHb, p < 0.01 for DHb). For statistical metrics and details, refer to Table S1. Data are shown as average ± s.e.m. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Fig. 4. Correlation between HDR and AQ…
Fig. 4. Correlation between HDR and AQ scores.
For all panels, values in the x-axis are multiplied for 10^4. The ρ (rho) index in each plot indicates the Spearman correlation value. Correlation between HDR and AQ scores in adults, for amplitudes obtained using RS (A), CF (B), and CC (C). No significant correlations were detected for adult participants. Correlation between HDR and AQ scores in children, for amplitudes obtained using high (D), and low (E) contrast baseline cartoons. A significant correlation was found between THb and AQ scores for both high- and low-contrast blended stimuli (p < 0.05 for both cases). Circles are individual values; lines represent the linear regression model fit and shaded regions are the 95% CI.
Fig. 5. Correlation between HDR and AQ…
Fig. 5. Correlation between HDR and AQ subscales in children.
For all panels, values in the x-axis are multiplied for ×10^4. The ρ (rho) index in each plot indicates the Spearman correlation value. A, B Correlations between HDR and AQ Social Skills (AQ_S) subscale. A significant correlation between THb and AQ_S was detected using both high- (A) and low-contrast blended stimuli (B; p < 0.05 for both cases). In addition, OHb recorded in response to the low-contrast blended RS-cartoon was significantly correlated with AQ_S (B; p < 0.05). C, D Correlations between HDR and AQ Communication (AQ_C) subscale. THb amplitude in response to the high-contrast blended RS-cartoon was significantly correlated with AQ_C (p < 0.05). Circles are individual values; lines represent the linear regression model fit and shaded regions are the 95% CI.

References

    1. Maenner MJ, Rice CE, Arneson CL, Cunniff C, Schieve LA, Carpenter LA, et al. Potential impact of DSM-5 criteria on autism spectrum disorder prevalence estimates. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:292–300.
    1. Wing L. The Continuum of Autistic Characteristics. In: Schopler E, Mesibov GB, (eds.) Diagnosis and Assessment in Autism. Current Issues in Autism. Boston, MA: Springer.
    1. Posserud M-B, Lundervold AJ, Gillberg C. Autistic features in a total population of 7–9-year-old children assessed by the ASSQ (Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire) J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47:167–75.
    1. Ruzich E, Allison C, Smith P, Watson P, Auyeung B, Ring H, et al. Measuring autistic traits in the general population: A systematic review of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a nonclinical population sample of 6,900 typical adult males and females. Mol Autism. 2015;6:2.
    1. Persico AM, Bourgeron T. Searching for ways out of the autism maze: Genetic, epigenetic and environmental clues. Trends Neurosci. 2006;29:349–58.
    1. Ruzich E, Allison C, Smith P, Watson P, Auyeung B, Ring H, et al. Subgrouping siblings of people with autism: Identifying the broader autism phenotype. Autism Res. 2016;9:658–65.
    1. Piven J, Palmer P, Jacobi D, Childress D, Arndt S. Broader autism phenotype: Evidence from a family history study of multiple-incidence autism families. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:185–90.
    1. Billeci L, Calderoni S, Conti E, Gesi C, Carmassi C, Dell’Osso L, et al. The broad autism (Endo)phenotype: Neurostructural and neurofunctional correlates in parents of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:346.
    1. Carpita B, Carmassi C, Calderoni S, Muti D, Muscarella A, Massimetti G, et al. The broad autism phenotype in real-life: clinical and functional correlates of autism spectrum symptoms and rumination among parents of patients with autism spectrum disorder. CNS Spectr. 2020;25:765–73.
    1. Ozonoff S, Young GS, Carter A, Messinger D, Yirmiya N, Zwaigenbaum L, et al. Recurrence risk for autism spectrum disorders: a Baby Siblings Research Consortium study. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e488–95.
    1. Messinger D, Young GS, Ozonoff S, Dobkins K, Carter A, Zwaigenbaum L, et al. Beyond autism: A baby siblings research consortium study of high-risk children at three years of age. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;52:300–.e1.
    1. Charman T, Young GS, Brian J, Carter A, Carver LJ, Chawarska K, et al. Non-ASD outcomes at 36 months in siblings at familial risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD): A baby siblings research consortium (BSRC) study. Autism Res. 2017;10:169–78.
    1. Pagnozzi AM, Conti E, Calderoni S, Fripp J, Rose SE. A systematic review of structural MRI biomarkers in autism spectrum disorder: A machine learning perspective. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2018;71:68–82.
    1. Frye RE, Vassall S, Kaur G, Lewis C, Karim M, Rossignol D. Emerging biomarkers in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:792.
    1. Amaral DG, Schumann CM, Nordahl CW. Neuroanatomy of autism. Trends Neurosci. 2008;31:137–45.
    1. Bellani M, Calderoni S, Muratori F, Brambilla P. Brain anatomy of autism spectrum disorders I. Focus on corpus callosum. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013;22:217–21.
    1. Bellani M, Calderoni S, Muratori F, Brambilla P. Brain anatomy of autism spectrum disorders II. Focus on amygdala. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013;22:309–12.
    1. Billeci L, Sicca F, Maharatna K, Apicella F, Narzisi A, Campatelli G, et al. On the application of quantitative EEG for characterizing autistic brain: A systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:442.
    1. Calderoni S, Bellani M, Hardan AY, Muratori F, Brambilla P. Basal ganglia and restricted and repetitive behaviours in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Current status and future perspectives. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2014;23:235–8.
    1. Bralten J, van Hulzen KJ, Martens MB, Galesloot TE, Arias Vasquez A, Kiemeney LA, et al. Autism spectrum disorders and autistic traits share genetics and biology. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:1205–12.
    1. Lloyd-Fox S, Blasi A, Elwell CE. Illuminating the developing brain: The past, present, and future of functional near infrared spectroscopy. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;34:269–84.
    1. Gervain J, Mehler J, Werker JF, Nelson CA, Csibra G, Lloyd-Fox S, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy: A report from the McDonnell infant methodology consortium. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011;1:22–46.
    1. Raichle ME, Mintun MA. Brain work and brain imaging. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:449–76.
    1. Vanderwert RE, Nelson CA. The use of near-infrared spectroscopy in the study of typical and atypical development. Neuroimage. 2014;85:264–71.
    1. Di Lorenzo R, Pirazzoli L, Blasi A, Bulgarelli C, Hakuno Y, Minagawa Y, et al. Recommendations for motion correction of infant fNIRS data applicable to multiple data sets and acquisition systems. Neuroimage. 2019;200:511–27.
    1. Yamasaki T, Ogata K, Maekawa T, Ijichi I, Katagiri M, Mitsudo T, et al. Rapid maturation of voice and linguistic processing systems in preschool children: A near-infrared spectroscopic study. Exp Neurol. 2013;250:313–20.
    1. Mazzoni A, Grove R, Eapen V, Lenroot RK, Bruggemann J. The promise of functional near-infrared spectroscopy in autism research: What do we know and where do we go? Soc Neurosci. 2019;14:505–18.
    1. Zhang F, Roeyers H. Exploring brain functions in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review on functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies. Int J Psychophysiol. 2019;137:41–53.
    1. Keehn B, Wagner JB, Tager-Flusberg H, Nelson CA. Functional connectivity in the first year of life in infants at-risk for autism: A preliminary near-infrared spectroscopy study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:444.
    1. Zhu H, Fan Y, Guo H, Huang D, He S. Reduced interhemispheric functional connectivity of children with autism spectrum disorder: Evidence from functional near infrared spectroscopy studies. Biomed Opt Express. 2014;5:1262–74.
    1. Li J, Qiu L, Xu L, Pedapati EV, Erickson CA, Sunar U. Characterization of autism spectrum disorder with spontaneous hemodynamic activity. Biomed Opt Express. 2016;7:3871–81.
    1. Li Y, Yu D. Weak network efficiency in young children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Evidence from a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain Cognition. 2016;108:47–55.
    1. Jia H, Li Y, Yu D. Attenuation of long-range temporal correlations of neuronal oscillations in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;20:424–32.
    1. Cao W, Zhu H, Li Y, Wang Y, Bai W, Lao U et al. The development of brain network in males with autism spectrum disorders from childhood to adolescence: Evidence from fNIRS study. Brain Sci. 2021;11:120. 10.3390/brainsci11010120.
    1. Xu M, Minagawa Y, Kumazaki H, Okada K-I, Naoi N. Prefrontal responses to odors in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: Functional NIRS measurement combined with a fragrance pulse ejection system. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:523456.
    1. Xiao T, Xiao Z, Ke X, Hong S, Yang H, Su Y, et al. Response inhibition impairment in high functioning autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from near-infrared spectroscopy data. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46569.
    1. Lloyd-Fox S, Blasi A, Elwell CE, Charman T, Murphy D, Johnson MH. Reduced neural sensitivity to social stimuli in infants at risk for autism. Proc Biol Sci. 2013;280:20123026.
    1. Braukmann R, Lloyd-Fox S, Blasi A, Johnson MH, Bekkering H, Buitelaar JK, et al. Diminished socially selective neural processing in 5-month-old infants at high familial risk of autism. Eur J Neurosci. 2018;47:720–8.
    1. Lloyd-Fox S, Blasi A, Pasco G, Gliga T, Jones EJH, Murphy DGM, et al. Cortical responses before 6 months of life associate with later autism. Eur J Neurosci. 2018;47:736–49.
    1. Bhat AN, McDonald NM, Eilbott JE, Pelphrey KA. Exploring cortical activation and connectivity in infants with and without familial risk for autism during naturalistic social interactions: A preliminary study. Infant Behav Dev. 2019;57:101337.
    1. Iwanaga R, Tanaka G, Nakane H, Honda S, Imamura A, Ozawa H. Usefulness of near-infrared spectroscopy to detect brain dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorder when inferring the mental state of others. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013;67:203–9.
    1. Zhu B, Godavarty A. Functional connectivity in the brain in joint attention skills using near infrared spectroscopy and imaging. Behav Brain Res. 2013;250:28–31.
    1. Zhu H, Li J, Fan Y, Li X, Huang D, He S. Atypical prefrontal cortical responses to joint/non-joint attention in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Biomed Opt Express. 2015;6:690–701.
    1. Tamura R, Kitamura H, Endo T, Abe R, Someya T. Decreased leftward bias of prefrontal activity in autism spectrum disorder revealed by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Psychiatry Res. 2012;203:237–40.
    1. Su W-C, Culotta M, Mueller J, Tsuzuki D, Pelphrey K, Bhat A. Differences in cortical activation patterns during action observation, action execution, and interpersonal synchrony between children with or without autism spectrum disorder (ASD): An fNIRS pilot study. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0240301.
    1. Kita Y, Gunji A, Inoue Y, Goto T, Sakihara K, Kaga M, et al. Self-face recognition in children with autism spectrum disorders: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain Dev. 2011;33:494–503.
    1. Nakadoi Y, Sumitani S, Watanabe Y, Akiyama M, Yamashita N, Ohmori T. Multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy shows reduced activation in the prefrontal cortex during facial expression processing in pervasive developmental disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012;66:26–33.
    1. Fox SE, Wagner JB, Shrock CL, Tager-Flusberg H, Nelson CA. Neural processing of facial identity and emotion in infants at high-risk for autism spectrum disorders. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:89.
    1. Mori K, Toda Y, Ito H, Mori T, Mori K, Goji A, et al. Neuroimaging in autism spectrum disorders: 1H-MRS and NIRS study. J Med Invest. 2015;62:29–36.
    1. Minagawa-Kawai Y, Naoi N, Kikuchi N, Yamamoto J-I, Nakamura K, Kojima S. Cerebral laterality for phonemic and prosodic cue decoding in children with autism. Neuroreport. 2009;20:1219–24.
    1. Funabiki Y, Murai T, Toichi M. Cortical activation during attention to sound in autism spectrum disorders. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33:518–24.
    1. Edwards LA, Wagner JB, Tager-Flusberg H, Nelson CA. Differences in neural correlates of speech perception in 3 month olds at high and low risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47:3125–38.
    1. Pecukonis M, Perdue KL, Wong J, Tager-Flusberg H, Nelson CA. Exploring the relation between brain response to speech at 6-months and language outcomes at 24-months in infants at high and low risk for autism spectrum disorder: A preliminary functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2021;47:100897.
    1. Yasumura A, Omori M, Fukuda A, Takahashi J, Yasumura Y, Nakagawa E, et al. Age-related differences in frontal lobe function in children with ADHD. Brain Dev. 2019;41:577–86.
    1. Chou P-H, Huang C-J, Sun C-W. The potential role of functional near-infrared spectroscopy as clinical biomarkers in schizophrenia. Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26:201–17.
    1. Husain SF, Yu R, Tang T-B, Tam WW, Tran B, Quek TT, et al. Validating a functional near-infrared spectroscopy diagnostic paradigm for Major Depressive Disorder. Sci Rep. 2020;10:9740.
    1. Xu L, Liu Y, Yu J, Li X, Yu X, Cheng H, et al. Characterizing autism spectrum disorder by deep learning spontaneous brain activity from functional near-infrared spectroscopy. J Neurosci Methods. 2020;331:108538.
    1. Yang D, Hong K-S, Yoo S-H, Kim C-S. Evaluation of neural degeneration biomarkers in the prefrontal cortex for early identification of patients with mild cognitive impairment: An fNIRS study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:317.
    1. Yanagisawa K, Nakamura N, Tsunashima H, Narita N. Proposal of auxiliary diagnosis index for autism spectrum disorder using near-infrared spectroscopy. Neurophotonics. 2016;3:031413.
    1. Xu L, Sun Z, Xie J, Yu J, Li J, Wang J. Identification of autism spectrum disorder based on short-term spontaneous hemodynamic fluctuations using deep learning in a multi-layer neural network. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132:457–68.
    1. Durand S, Patrizi A, Quast KB, Hachigian L, Pavlyuk R, Saxena A, et al. NMDA receptor regulation prevents regression of visual cortical function in the absence of Mecp2. Neuron. 2012;76:1078–90.
    1. de Freitas Dotto P, Cavascan NN, Berezovsky A, Sacai PY, Rocha DM, Pereira JM, et al. Sweep visually evoked potentials and visual findings in children with West syndrome. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014;18:201–10.
    1. Begenisic T, Sansevero G, Baroncelli L, Cioni G, Sale A. Early environmental therapy rescues brain development in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;82:409–19.
    1. Boggio EM, Pancrazi L, Gennaro M, Lo Rizzo C, Mari F, Meloni I, et al. Visual impairment in FOXG1-mutated individuals and mice. Neuroscience. 2016;324:496–508.
    1. Mazziotti R, Lupori L, Sagona G, Gennaro M, Della Sala G, Putignano E, et al. Searching for biomarkers of CDKL5 disorder: early-onset visual impairment in CDKL5 mutant mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:2290–8.
    1. Mazziotti R, Cacciante F, Sagona G, Lupori L, Gennaro M, Putignano E, et al. Novel translational phenotypes and biomarkers for creatine transporter deficiency. Brain Commun. 2020;2:fcaa089.
    1. LeBlanc JJ, DeGregorio G, Centofante E, Vogel-Farley VK, Barnes K, Kaufmann WE, et al. Visual evoked potentials detect cortical processing deficits in Rett syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2015;78:775–86.
    1. Keehn B, Westerfield M, Townsend J. Brief report: Cross-modal capture: Preliminary evidence of inefficient filtering in children with Aautism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49:385–90.
    1. Little J-A. Vision in children with autism spectrum disorder: A critical review. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101:504–13.
    1. Seymour RA, Rippon G, Gooding-Williams G, Schoffelen JM, Kessler K. Dysregulated oscillatory connectivity in the visual system in autism spectrum disorder. Brain. 2019;142:3294–305.
    1. Spiegel A, Mentch J, Haskins AJ, Robertson CE. Slower binocular rivalry in the autistic brain. Curr Biol. 2019;29:2948–.e3.
    1. Kovarski K, Malvy J, Khanna RK, Arsène S, Batty M, Latinus M. Reduced visual evoked potential amplitude in autism spectrum disorder, a variability effect? Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9:341.
    1. Wijeakumar S, Shahani U, Simpson WA, McCulloch DL. Localization of hemodynamic responses to simple visual stimulation: An fNIRS study. Investigative Opthalmology Vis Sci. 2012;53:2266.
    1. Chen L-C, Sandmann P, Thorne JD, Herrmann CS, Debener S. Association of concurrent fNIRS and EEG signatures in response to auditory and visual stimuli. Brain Topogr. 2015;28:710–25.
    1. Pinti P, Tachtsidis I, Hamilton A, Hirsch J, Aichelburg C, Gilbert S, et al. The present and future use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience. Ann N. Y Acad Sci. 2020;1464:5–29.
    1. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Skinner R, Martin J, Clubley E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31:5–17.
    1. Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Allison C. The Autism Spectrum Quotient: Children’s version (AQ-Child) J Autism Dev Disord. 2008;38:1230–40.
    1. Tachtsidis I, Scholkmann F. False positives and false negatives in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Issues, challenges, and the way forward. Neurophotonics. 2016;3:031405.
    1. Ward LM, Aitchison RT, Tawse M, Simmers AJ, Shahani U. Reduced haemodynamic response in the ageing visual cortex measured by absolute fNIRS. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125012.
    1. Simmons DR, Robertson AE, McKay LS, Toal E, McAleer P, Pollick FE. Vision in autism spectrum disorders. Vis Res. 2009;49:2705–39.
    1. Park WJ, Schauder KB, Zhang R, Bennetto L, Tadin D. High internal noise and poor external noise filtering characterize perception in autism spectrum disorder. Sci Rep. 2017;7:17584.
    1. Noel J-P, Lakshminarasimhan KJ, Park H, Angelaki DE. Increased variability but intact integration during visual navigation in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:11158–66.
    1. Noel J-P, Zhang L-Q, Stocker AA, Angelaki DE. Individuals with autism spectrum disorder have altered visual encoding capacity. PLoS Biol. 2021;19:e3001215.
    1. Turi M, Burr DC, Binda P. Pupillometry reveals perceptual differences that are tightly linked to autistic traits in typical adults. Elife 2018;7:e32399. 10.7554/eLife.32399.
    1. Tortelli C, Turi M, Burr DC, Binda P. Objective pupillometry shows that perceptual styles covary with autistic-like personality traits. Elife 2021;10:e67185. 10.7554/eLife.67185.
    1. Van der Hallen R, Evers K, Brewaeys K, Van den Noortgate W, Wagemans J. Global processing takes time: A meta-analysis on local–global visual processing in ASD. Psychological Bull. 2015;141:549–73.
    1. Ouellette J, Toussay X, Comin CH, Costa L, da F, Ho M, et al. Vascular contributions to 16p11.2 deletion autism syndrome modeled in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:1090–101.
    1. Kozberg M, Hillman E. Neurovascular coupling and energy metabolism in the developing brain. Prog Brain Res. 2016;225:213–42.
    1. Harris JJ, Reynell C, Attwell D. The physiology of developmental changes in BOLD functional imaging signals. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011;1:199–216.
    1. Broadbent J, Galic I, Stokes MA. Validation of Autism Spectrum Quotient adult version in an Australian sample. Autism Res Treat. 2013;2013:1–7.
    1. Lundqvist L-O, Lindner H. Is the Autism-Spectrum Quotient a valid measure of traits associated with the autism spectrum? A Rasch validation in adults with and without autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47:2080–91.
    1. Wouters SGM, Spek AA. The use of the Autism-spectrum Quotient in differentiating high-functioning adults with autism, adults with schizophrenia, and a neurotypical adult control group. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2011;5:1169–75.
    1. Leekam SR, Nieto C, Libby SJ, Wing L, Gould J. Describing the sensory abnormalities of children and adults with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007;37:894–910.
    1. Scharre JE, Creedon MP. Assessment of visual function in autistic children. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69:433–9.
    1. Apicella F, Costanzo V, Purpura G. Are early visual behavior impairments involved in the onset of autism spectrum disorders? Insights for early diagnosis and intervention. Eur J Pediatrics. 2020;179:225–34.
    1. Kern JK, Trivedi MH, Grannemann BD, Garver CR, Johnson DG, Andrews AA, et al. Sensory correlations in autism. Autism. 2007;11:123–34.
    1. Jones W, Klin A. Attention to eyes is present but in decline in 2–6-month-old infants later diagnosed with autism. Nature. 2013;504:427–31.
    1. McPartland JC, Lerner MD, Bhat A, Clarkson T, Jack A, Koohsari S et al. Looking back at the next 40 years of ASD neuroscience research. J Autism Dev Disord. 2021. 10.1007/s10803-021-05095-5.
    1. Baird G, Cass H, Slonims V. Diagnosis of autism. BMJ. 2003;327:488–93.
    1. Zwaigenbaum L, Bryson SE, Brian J, Smith IM, Roberts W, Szatmari P, et al. Stability of diagnostic assessment for autism spectrum disorder between 18 and 36 months in a high-risk cohort. Autism Res. 2016;9:790–800.
    1. Emerson RW, Adams C, Nishino T, Hazlett HC, Wolff JJ, Zwaigenbaum L et al. Functional neuroimaging of high-risk 6-month-old infants predicts a diagnosis of autism at 24 months of age. Sci Transl Med. 2017. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2882.
    1. Hazlett HC, Gu H, Munsell BC, Kim SH, Styner M, Wolff JJ, et al. Early brain development in infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorder. Nature. 2017;542:348–51.
    1. Stokes MA, Kornienko L, Scheeren AM, Koot HM, Begeer S. A comparison of children and adolescent’s self-report and parental report of the PedsQL among those with and without autism spectrum disorder. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:611–24.
    1. Ruta L, Mazzone D, Mazzone L, Wheelwright S, Baron-Cohen S. The Autism-Spectrum Quotient−Italian version: A cross-cultural confirmation of the broader autism phenotype. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42:625–33.
    1. Vrana A, Meier ML, Hotz-Boendermaker S, Humphreys BK, Scholkmann F. Cortical sensorimotor processing of painful pressure in patients with chronic lower Back pain—an optical neuroimaging study using fNIRS. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:578.
    1. Zimeo Morais GA, Balardin JB, Sato JR. fNIRS Optodes’ Location Decider (fOLD): A toolbox for probe arrangement guided by brain regions-of-interest. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3341.
    1. Peirce J, Gray JR, Simpson S, MacAskill M, Höchenberger R, Sogo H, et al. PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behav Res Methods. 2019;51:195–203.
    1. Gollapudi S. OpenCV with Python. In Learn Computer Vision Using OpenCV. 2019. p. 31–50.
    1. Vallat R. Pingouin: Statistics in Python. J Open Source Softw. 2018;3:1026.
    1. Hunter JD. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng. 2007;9:90–95.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere