Variation in the Williams syndrome GTF2I gene and anxiety proneness interactively affect prefrontal cortical response to aversive stimuli

M Jabbi, Q Chen, N Turner, P Kohn, M White, J S Kippenhan, D Dickinson, B Kolachana, V Mattay, D R Weinberger, K F Berman, M Jabbi, Q Chen, N Turner, P Kohn, M White, J S Kippenhan, D Dickinson, B Kolachana, V Mattay, D R Weinberger, K F Berman

Abstract

Characterizing the molecular mechanisms underlying the heritability of complex behavioral traits such as human anxiety remains a challenging endeavor for behavioral neuroscience. Copy-number variation (CNV) in the general transcription factor gene, GTF2I, located in the 7q11.23 chromosomal region that is hemideleted in Williams syndrome and duplicated in the 7q11.23 duplication syndrome (Dup7), is associated with gene-dose-dependent anxiety in mouse models and in both Williams syndrome and Dup7. Because of this recent preclinical and clinical identification of a genetic influence on anxiety, we examined whether sequence variation in GTF2I, specifically the single-nucleotide polymorphism rs2527367, interacts with trait and state anxiety to collectively impact neural response to anxiety-laden social stimuli. Two hundred and sixty healthy adults completed the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire Harm Avoidance (HA) subscale, a trait measure of anxiety proneness, and underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while matching aversive (fearful or angry) facial identity. We found an interaction between GTF2I allelic variations and HA that affects brain response: in individuals homozygous for the major allele, there was no correlation between HA and whole-brain response to aversive cues, whereas in heterozygotes and individuals homozygous for the minor allele, there was a positive correlation between HA sub-scores and a selective dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) responsivity during the processing of aversive stimuli. These results demonstrate that sequence variation in the GTF2I gene influences the relationship between trait anxiety and brain response to aversive social cues in healthy individuals, supporting a role for this neurogenetic mechanism in anxiety.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00004571.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Voxel-wise brain response to aversive social cues>geometric shapes. (a) Whole-brain response to aversive cues independent of genotype as derived from a one-sample t-test thresholded at P<0.001; the color bar represents t-statistics. (b) DLPFC response to aversive cues as related to individual variability in anxiety proneness scores of HA centered on MNI coordinates x, y, z=51, 30, 12, thresholded at P<0.05; the color bar represents t-statistics. (c) Contrast images of the effect of GTF2I allelic variation on HA-predicted prefrontal response to aversive social cues centered on MNI coordinates x, y, z=51, 30, 12 at P=0.002, with the results masked with HA-predicted BOLD response to aversive content; the color bar represents F-statistics. DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; HA, harm avoidance; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Post hoc visualization plots showing the association between HA scores and DLPFC BOLD response for each GTF2I allelic variant separately. (a) Correlation plot showing no association between HA scores and DLPFC BOLD response to aversive social stimuli in individuals homozygous for the GTF2I major t/t allele. (b, c) Correlation plots show a robust positive association between HA scores and DLPFC response in GTF2I heterozygous t/c carriers and those homozygous for the minor c/c alleles, respectively. Signal values were extracted from the DLPFC cluster centered on MNI coordinates x, y, z=51, 30, 12 representing the maximal voxel in the DLPFC where BOLD response was also predicted by HA scores and their interaction with GTF2I allelic variation, as shown in Figure 1a (upper right image). DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; HA, harm avoidance; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute.

References

    1. Hudson JI, Mangweth B, Pope HG, Jr, De Col C, Hausmann A, Gutweniger S, et al. Family study of affective spectrum disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:170–177.
    1. Smoller JW, Faraone SV. Genetics of anxiety disorders: complexities and opportunities. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2008;148:85–88.
    1. Osborne LR, Mervis CB. Rearrangements of the Williams-Beuren syndrome locus: molecular basis and implications for speech and language development. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2007;9:1–16.
    1. Schubert C. The genomic basis of the Williams-Beuren syndrome. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:1178–1197.
    1. Somerville MJ, Mervis CB, Young EJ, Seo EJ, del Campo M, Bamforth S, et al. Severe expressive-language delay related to duplication of the Williams-Beuren locus. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1694–1701.
    1. Klein-Tasman BP, Mervis CB. Distinctive personality characteristics of 8-, 9-, and 10-year-olds with Williams syndrome. Dev Neuropsychol. 2003;23:269–290.
    1. Meyer-Lindenberg A, Hariri AR, Munoz KE, Mervis CB, Mattay VS, Morris CA, et al. Neural correlates of genetically abnormal social cognition in Williams syndrome. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:991–993.
    1. Järvinen A, Korenberg JR, Bellugi U. The social phenotype of Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23:414–422.
    1. Dodd HF, Schniering CA, Porter MA. Beyond behaviour: is social anxiety low in Williams syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009;39:1673–1681.
    1. Mervis CB, Dida J, Lam E, Crawford-Zelli NA, Young EJ, Henderson DR, et al. Duplication of GTF2I results in separation anxiety in mice and humans. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90:1064–1070.
    1. Sanders SJ, Ercan-Sencicek AG, Hus V, Luo R, Murtha MT, Moreno-De-Luca D, et al. Multiple recurrent de novo CNVs, including duplications of the 7q11.23 Williams syndrome region, are strongly associated with autism. Neuron. 2011;70:863–885.
    1. Sakurai T, Dorr NP, Takahashi N, McInnes LA, Elder GA, Buxbaum JD. Haploinsufficiency of GTF2I, a gene deleted in Williams Syndrome, leads to increases in social interactions. Autism Res. 2011;4:28–39.
    1. Roy AL. Biochemistry and biology of the inducible multifunctional transcription factor TFII-I. Gene. 2001;274:1–13.
    1. Dida J.Effect of GTF2I gene on anxiety. MSc thesis, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, 2013; ; .
    1. Rose EJ, Donohoe G. Brain vs behavior: an effect size comparison of neuroimaging and cognitive studies of genetic risk for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39:518–526.
    1. Jabbi M, Kippenhan JS, Kohn P, Marenco S, Mervis CB, Morris CA, et al. The Williams syndrome chromosome 7q11.23 hemideletion confers hypersocial, anxious personality coupled with altered insula structure and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E860–E866.
    1. Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. A proposal. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:573–588.
    1. Hariri AR, Bookheimer SY, Mazziotta JC. Modulating emotional responses: effects of a neocortical network on the limbic system. Neuroreport. 2000;11:43–48.
    1. Ekman P, Friesen WV. Pictures of Facial Affect. Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA; 1976.
    1. Terburg D, Morgan BE, Montoya ER, Hooge IT, Thornton HB, Hariri AR, et al. Hypervigilance for fear after basolateral amygdala damage in humans. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2:e115.
    1. Hariri AR, Mattay VS, Tessitore A, Kolachana B, Fera F, Goldman D, et al. Serotonin transporter genetic variation and the response of the human amygdala. Science. 2002;297:400–403.
    1. Brown SM, Peet E, Manuck SB, Williamson DE, Dahl RE, Ferrell RE, et al. A regulatory variant of the human tryptophan hydroxylase-2 gene biases amygdala reactivity. Mol Psychiatry. 2005;10:884–888.
    1. Meyer-Lindenberg A, Kolachana B, Gold B, Olsh A, Nicodemus KK, Mattay V, et al. Genetic variants in AVPR1 A linked to autism predict amygdala activation and personality traits in healthy humans. Mol Psychiatry. 2009;14:968–975.
    1. Hariri AR, Tessitore A, Mattay VS, Fera F, Weinberger DR. The amygdala response to emotional stimuli: a comparison of faces and scenes. Neuroimage. 2002;17:317–323.
    1. Arnsten AF, Rubia K. Neurobiological circuits regulating attention, cognitive control, motivation, and emotion: disruptions in neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolescent Psychiatry. 2012;51:356–367.
    1. Krawczyk DC. Contributions of the prefrontal cortex to the neural basis of human decision-making. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26:631–664.
    1. Shackman AJ, McMenamin BW, Maxwell JS, Greischar LL, Davidson RJ. Right dorsolateral prefrontal cortical activity and behavioral inhibition. Psychol Sci. 2009;20:1500–1506.
    1. Lei X, Chen C, Xue F, He Q, Chen C, Liu Q, et al. Fiber connectivity between the striatum and cortical and subcortical regions is associated with temperaments in Chinese males. NeuroImage. 2014;89:226–234.
    1. Baeken C, Marinazzo D, Van Schuerbeek P, Wu GR, De Mey J, Luypaert R, et al. Left and right amygdala—mediofrontal cortical functional connectivity is differentially modulated by harm avoidance. PLoS One. 2014;9:e95740.
    1. Prater KE, Hosanagar A, Klumpp H, Angstadt M, Phan KL. Aberrant amygdala-frontal cortex connectivity during perception of fearful faces and at rest in generalized social anxiety disorder. Depress Anxiety. 2013;30:234–241.
    1. Birn RM, Shackman AJ, Oler JA, Williams LE, McFarlin DR, Rogers GM, et al. Evolutionarily conserved prefrontal-amygdalar dysfunction in early-life anxiety. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:915–922.
    1. Copeland WE, Angold A, Shanahan L, Costello EJ. Longitudinal patterns of anxiety from childhood to adulthood: the Great Smoky Mountains Study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53:21–33.
    1. Milrod B, Markowitz JC, Gerber AJ, Cyranowski J, Altemus M, Shapiro T, et al. Childhood separation anxiety and the pathogenesis and treatment of adult anxiety. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:34–43.
    1. Hirshfeld-Becker DR, Micco JA, Simoes NA, Henin A. High risk studies and developmental antecedents of anxiety disorders. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2008;148:99–117.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere