Informed consent process: A step further towards making it meaningful!

Rashmi Ashish Kadam, Rashmi Ashish Kadam

Abstract

Informed consent process is the cornerstone of ethics in clinical research. Obtaining informed consent from patients participating in clinical research is an important legal and ethical imperative for clinical trial researchers. Although informed consent is an important process in clinical research, its effectiveness and validity are always a concern. Issues related to understanding, comprehension, competence, and voluntariness of clinical trial participants may adversely affect the informed consent process. Communication of highly technical, complex, and specialized clinical trial information to participants with limited literacy, diverse sociocultural background, diminished autonomy, and debilitating diseases is a difficult task for clinical researchers. It is therefore essential to investigate and adopt innovative communication strategies to enhance understanding of clinical trial information among participants. This review article visits the challenges that affect the informed consent process and explores various innovative strategies to enhance the consent process.

Keywords: Clinical trials; competence; comprehension; informed consent; strategies; understanding.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Components of a valid and meaningful informed consent

References

    1. Sreenivasan G. Does informed consent to research require comprehension? Lancet. 2003;362:2016–8.
    1. Belmont Report. [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 07]. Available from: .
    1. Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2001;358:1772–7.
    1. Bhatt A. Improving quality of informed consent in clinical research. J Postgrad Med. 2015;61:221–2.
    1. Thaker SJ, Figer BH, Gogtay NJ, Thatte UM. An audit of consent refusals in clinical research at a tertiary care center in India. J Postgrad Med. 2015;61:257–63.
    1. Mandava A, Pace C, Campbell B, Emanuel E, Grady C. The quality of informed consent: Mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:356–65.
    1. Dunn LB, Jeste DV. Enhancing informed consent for research and treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24:595–607.
    1. Pallodino M. Challenges in the informed consent process: Identifying design strategies that enhance communication in adult clinical trials. Res Pract. 2002;3:164–71.
    1. Pandiya A. Readability and comprehensibility of informed consent forms for clinical trials. Perspect Clin Res. 2010;1:98–100.
    1. Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:721–6.
    1. Wirshing DA, Wirshing WC, Marder SR, Liberman RP, Mintz J. Informed consent: Assessment of comprehension. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155:1508–11.
    1. Fitzgerald DW, Marotte C, Verdier RI, Johnson WD, Jr, Pape JW. Comprehension during informed consent in a less-developed country. Lancet. 2002;360:1301–2.
    1. Jimison HB, Sher PP, Appleyard R, LeVernois Y. The use of multimedia in the informed consent process. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5:245–56.
    1. Lantos J. Informed consent. The whole truth for patients? Cancer. 1993;72(9 Suppl):2811–5.
    1. Kamath A, Up R, Shenoy K. Willingness to participate in a clinical trial and understanding of informed consent information among medical students. Indian J Med Ethics. 2014;11:16–8.
    1. DeCosta A, D'Souza N, Krishnan S, Chhabra MS, Shihaam I, Goswami K. Community based trials and informed consent in rural North India. J Med Ethics. 2004;30:318–23.
    1. Bhansali S, Shafiq N, Malhotra S, Pandhi P, Singh I, Venkateshan SP, et al. Evaluation of the ability of clinical research participants to comprehend informed consent form. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30:427–30.
    1. Kumar S, Mohanraj R, Rose A, Paul MJ, Thomas G. How ‘informed’ is informed consent? Findings from a study in South India. Indian J Med Ethics. 2012;9:180–6.
    1. Davis TC, Holcombe RF, Berkel HJ, Pramanik S, Divers SG. Informed consent for clinical trials: A comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:668–74.
    1. Kim L, Young AJ, Neimeyer RA, Baker JN, Barfield RC. Keeping users at the center: Developing a multimedia interface for informed consent. Tech Commun Q. 2008;17:335–57.
    1. A Guide to Informed Consent- Information Sheet. Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators. [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 08]. Available from: .
    1. Michie S, Lester K. Words matter: Increasing the implementation of clinical guidelines. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:367–70.
    1. Dresden GM, Levitt MA. Modifying a standard industry clinical trial consent form improves patient information retention as part of the informed consent process. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:246–52.
    1. Universal Use of Short and Readable Informed Consent Documents: How do We Get There? Summary of Strategic Planning Meeting 30 May, 2007. [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 13]. Available from: .
    1. Hochhauser M. Informed consent: Reading and understanding are not the same. Appl Clin Trials. 2004. [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 13]. Available from: .
    1. Miller CK, O'Donnell DC, Searight HR, Barbarash RA. The deaconess informed consent comprehension test: An assessment tool for clinical research subjects. Pharmacotherapy. 1996;16:872–8.
    1. Sugarman J, Lavori PW, Boeger M, Cain C, Edsond R, Morrison V, et al. Evaluating the quality of informed consent. Clin Trials. 2005;2:34–41.
    1. Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC. Quality of informed consent: A new measure of understanding among research subjects. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:139–47.
    1. Michielutte R, Bahnson J, Dignan MB, Schroeder EM. The use of illustrations and narrative text style to improve readability of a health education brochure. J Cancer Educ. 1992;7:251–60.
    1. Kass NE, Taylor HA, Ali J, Hallez K, Chaisson L. A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: Feasibility, approach, and results. Clin Trials. 2015;12:54–66.
    1. Understanding the Informed Consent Process. (Printed Brochure) [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 13]. Available from: .
    1. Implementation of a multicomponent process to obtain informed consent in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The DCCT Research Group. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:83–96.
    1. Wirshing DA, Sergi MJ, Mintz J. A videotape intervention to enhance the informed consent process for medical and psychiatric treatment research. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:186–8.
    1. Blake K, Holbrook JT, Antal H, Shade D, Bunnell HT, McCahan SM, et al. Use of mobile devices and the internet for multimedia informed consent delivery and data entry in a pediatric asthma trial: Study design and rationale. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;42:105–18.
    1. Jefford M, Moore R. Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:485–93.
    1. Ghooi RB. How informed are our subjects? Perspect Clin Res. 2016;7:109–10.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere