Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study

Mark S Pearce, Jane A Salotti, Mark P Little, Kieran McHugh, Choonsik Lee, Kwang Pyo Kim, Nicola L Howe, Cecile M Ronckers, Preetha Rajaraman, Alan W Sir Craft, Louise Parker, Amy Berrington de González, Mark S Pearce, Jane A Salotti, Mark P Little, Kieran McHugh, Choonsik Lee, Kwang Pyo Kim, Nicola L Howe, Cecile M Ronckers, Preetha Rajaraman, Alan W Sir Craft, Louise Parker, Amy Berrington de González

Abstract

Background: Although CT scans are very useful clinically, potential cancer risks exist from associated ionising radiation, in particular for children who are more radiosensitive than adults. We aimed to assess the excess risk of leukaemia and brain tumours after CT scans in a cohort of children and young adults.

Methods: In our retrospective cohort study, we included patients without previous cancer diagnoses who were first examined with CT in National Health Service (NHS) centres in England, Wales, or Scotland (Great Britain) between 1985 and 2002, when they were younger than 22 years of age. We obtained data for cancer incidence, mortality, and loss to follow-up from the NHS Central Registry from Jan 1, 1985, to Dec 31, 2008. We estimated absorbed brain and red bone marrow doses per CT scan in mGy and assessed excess incidence of leukaemia and brain tumours cancer with Poisson relative risk models. To avoid inclusion of CT scans related to cancer diagnosis, follow-up for leukaemia began 2 years after the first CT and for brain tumours 5 years after the first CT.

Findings: During follow-up, 74 of 178,604 patients were diagnosed with leukaemia and 135 of 176,587 patients were diagnosed with brain tumours. We noted a positive association between radiation dose from CT scans and leukaemia (excess relative risk [ERR] per mGy 0·036, 95% CI 0·005-0·120; p=0·0097) and brain tumours (0·023, 0·010-0·049; p<0·0001). Compared with patients who received a dose of less than 5 mGy, the relative risk of leukaemia for patients who received a cumulative dose of at least 30 mGy (mean dose 51·13 mGy) was 3·18 (95% CI 1·46-6·94) and the relative risk of brain cancer for patients who received a cumulative dose of 50-74 mGy (mean dose 60·42 mGy) was 2·82 (1·33-6·03).

Interpretation: Use of CT scans in children to deliver cumulative doses of about 50 mGy might almost triple the risk of leukaemia and doses of about 60 mGy might triple the risk of brain cancer. Because these cancers are relatively rare, the cumulative absolute risks are small: in the 10 years after the first scan for patients younger than 10 years, one excess case of leukaemia and one excess case of brain tumour per 10,000 head CT scans is estimated to occur. Nevertheless, although clinical benefits should outweigh the small absolute risks, radiation doses from CT scans ought to be kept as low as possible and alternative procedures, which do not involve ionising radiation, should be considered if appropriate.

Funding: US National Cancer Institute and UK Department of Health.

Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Relative risk of leukaemia and brain tumours in relation to estimated radiation doses to the red bone marrow and brain from CT scans (A) Leukaemia and (B) brain tumours. Dotted line is the fitted linear dose-response model (excess relative risk per mGy). Bars show 95% CIs.

References

    1. Pearce MS. Patterns in paediatric CT use: an international and epidemiological perspective. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2011;55:107–109.
    1. Rehani MM, Berry M. Radiation doses in computed tomography. The increasing doses of radiation need to be controlled. BMJ. 2000;320:593–594.
    1. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from paediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289–296.
    1. Parker L. Computed tomography scanning in children: radiation risks. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001;18:307–308.
    1. Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF. Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for paediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:297–301.
    1. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body screening. Radiology. 2004;232:735–738.
    1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284.
    1. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Int Med. 2009;169:2071–2077.
    1. Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Yang C, Kaminski JM. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biology and experimental data. Radiology. 2009;251:13–22.
    1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation . UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly. United Nations; New York: 2010.
    1. National Radiological Protection Board . Survey of CT practice in the UK. National Radiological Protection Board; Chilton, UK: 1919.
    1. Shrimpton P, Hillier M, Lewis M, Dunn M. Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK-2003 (NRPB-W67) National Radiological Protection Board; Chilton, UK: 2005.
    1. Lee C, Lodwick D, Hurtado J, Pafundi D, Williams JL, Bolch WE. The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:339–363.
    1. Lee C, Kim K, Long D. Organ doses for reference adult male and female undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulations. Med Phys. 2011;38:1196–1206.
    1. Kim KP, Berrington de González A, Pearce MS. Development of a database of organ doses for pediatric and young adult CT scans in the United Kingdom. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2012 doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr429. published online Jan 6.
    1. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation . Health Risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. BEIR VII Phase 2. The National Academies Press; Washington DC: 2006.
    1. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Monographs on statistics and applied probability 37. 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC; Boca Raton, FL: 1989. Generalized linear models; pp. 1–526.
    1. Preston DL, Lubin JH, Pierce DA, McConney ME. Epicure: user's guide. Hirosoft International Corporation; Seattle, WA: 1993.
    1. Einstein AJ. Effects of radiation exposure from cardiac imaging: how good are the data? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:553–565.
    1. Preston DL, Kusumi S, Tomonaga M. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III: leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Radiat Res. 1994;137:S68–S97.
    1. Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M. Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. BMJ. 2005;331:77–80.
    1. Boice JD, Jr, Preston D, Davis FG, Monson RR. Frequent chest x-ray fluoroscopy and breast cancer incidence among tuberculosis patients in Massachusetts. Radiat Res. 1991;125:214–222.
    1. Davis F, Il'yasova D, Rankin K, McCarthy B, Bigner DD. Medical diagnostic radiation exposures and risk of gliomas. Radiat Res. 2011;175:790–796.
    1. Blettner M, Schlehofer B, Samkange-Zeeb F, Berg G, Schlaefer K, Schüz J. Medical exposure to ionising radiation and the risk of brain tumours: Interphone study group, Germany. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1990–1998.
    1. Office for National Statistics . Summary quality report for cancer registration statistics. Information Paper, Office for National Statistics; 2011.
    1. Ahmed BA, Connolly BL, Shroff P. Cumulative effective doses from radiologic procedures for pediatric oncology patients. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e851–e858.
    1. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu CM. Measurement error in nonlinear models. A modern perspective. Chapman and Hall/CRC; Boca Raton, FL: 2006. pp. 1–488.
    1. Little MP, Azizova TV, Bazyka D, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of circulatory disease from exposure to low-level ionizing radiation and estimates of potential population mortality risks. Env Health Perspect (in press).
    1. Chodick G, Ronckers CM, Shalev V, Ron E. Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to radiation exposure from computed tomography examinations in children. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007;9:584–587.
    1. Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC. Image gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:868–873.
    1. Budoff M. Cardiac CT: benefits outweigh the risks. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:275–276.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere