Phase 1b Evaluation of Abaloparatide Solid Microstructured Transdermal System (Abaloparatide-sMTS) in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mineral Density

Paul D Miller, Steven Troy, Richard J Weiss, Miriam Annett, Jason Schense, Setareh A Williams, Bruce Mitlak, Paul D Miller, Steven Troy, Richard J Weiss, Miriam Annett, Jason Schense, Setareh A Williams, Bruce Mitlak

Abstract

Background and objective: Abaloparatide, an anabolic osteoporosis treatment administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection, increases bone mineral density (BMD) and reduces fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The abaloparatide-solid Microstructured Transdermal System [abaloparatide-sMTS (Kindeva, St Paul, MN, USA)], which delivers abaloparatide intradermally, is in development to provide an alternative method for abaloparatide delivery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of subjects to self-administer abaloparatide-sMTS, based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic markers.

Methods: In this single-arm, open-label, Phase 1b study, 22 healthy postmenopausal women aged 50-85 years with low BMD were trained to self-administer abaloparatide-sMTS 300 μg once daily to the thigh for 5 min for 29 days. The primary endpoint was systemic exposure to abaloparatide. Secondary endpoints included percent change from baseline in serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (s-PINP), patient experience, and safety.

Results: All 22 subjects completed the study. At baseline, mean age was 65.2 years, mean total hip T-score was - 1.32, and mean lumbar spine T-score was - 1.98. On Day 1, the median time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax) for abaloparatide-sMTS was 0.33 h and geometric mean (CV %) maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) were 447 (38.0) pg/mL and 678 (45.3) pg·h/mL, respectively; the pharmacokinetic profile was similar on Days 15 and 29. Median percentage change in s-PINP was 45.4% and 64.4% at Days 15 and 29, respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were application site erythema, pain, and swelling, which were mostly of mild or moderate severity. No AEs led to study drug withdrawal and no serious AEs were reported. The success rate for self-administration at first application was 99.7%, and subject acceptability was high (~ 4.5 on a 5-point Likert Scale).

Conclusions: Subjects successfully self-administered abaloparatide-sMTS, which provided a consistent pharmacokinetic profile over 29 days and produced s-PINP increases from baseline similar to that observed in the pivotal trial with abaloparatide-SC. Observed patient experience along with the clinical data support continued clinical development of abaloparatide-sMTS.

Trial registration number: NCT04366726, Date of registration 04/29/2020, retrospectively registered.

Conflict of interest statement

PDM has received research support from and is a member of an advisory board for Radius Health, Inc. JS is a paid consultant for Radius Health, Inc. and he has also received reimbursement for travel related to this study. ST, RJW, MA, SAW, and BM are employees of and own company stock in Radius Health, Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. ABL-sMTS abaloparatide-solid Microstructured Transdermal System, D day
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean (±SD) plasma concentrations of 300 μg abaloparatide-sMTS over time (N = 22) on a linear scale (a) and logarithmic scale (b). h hour, LLOQ lower limit of quantitation, SD standard deviation, sMTS solid Microstructured Transdermal System
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Median (interquartile range) s-PINP (ng/mL) at Days 15 and 29 (N = 22). Baseline is defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose. BL baseline, s-PINP serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide

References

    1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(3):465–475. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.061113.
    1. Leader D, Williams S, Curtis J, Gut R. Osteoporosis-related fracture events in the US [AMCP Nexus Abstract M19] J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017;23(Suppl 10a):S78.
    1. Pavone V, Testa G, Giardina SMC, Vescio A, Restivo DA, Sessa G. Pharmacological Therapy of osteoporosis: A systematic current review of literature. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:803. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00803.
    1. Canalis E, Giustina A, Bilezikian JP. Mechanisms of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(9):905–916. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra067395.
    1. Solomon DH, Johnston SS, Boytsov NN, McMorrow D, Lane JM, Krohn KD. Osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture in U.S. patients between 2002 and 2011. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(9):1929–1937. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2202.
    1. Yusuf AA, Matlon TJ, Grauer A, Barron R, Chandler D, Peng Y. Utilization of osteoporosis medication after a fragility fracture among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Osteoporos. 2016;11(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0285-0.
    1. Durden E, Pinto L, Lopez-Gonzalez L, Juneau P, Barron R. Two-year persistence and compliance with osteoporosis therapies among postmenopausal women in a commercially insured population in the United States. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0316-5.
    1. Modi A, Sajjan S, Insinga R, Weaver J, Lewiecki EM, Harris ST. Frequency of discontinuation of injectable osteoporosis therapies in US patients over 2 years. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(4):1355–1363. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3886-y.
    1. Patient Perception of Value in Healthcare: Osteoporosis and Bone Fragility. A patient-oriented value (POV™) report prepared by Connect 4 Strategies, LLC on behalf of National Osteoporosis Foundation. . Accessed 11 Jan 2021.
    1. Gold DT, Weiss R, Beckett T, et al. Abaloparatide Real-World Patient Experience Study. JBMR Plus. 2021. 10.1002/jbm4.10457.
    1. Norman JJ, Arya JM, McClain MA, Frew PM, Meltzer MI, Prausnitz MR. Microneedle patches: usability and acceptability for self-vaccination against influenza. Vaccine. 2014;32(16):1856–1862. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.076.
    1. Ita K. Transdermal delivery of drugs with microneedles-potential and challenges. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7(3):90–105. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7030090.
    1. Hattersley G, Dean T, Corbin BA, Bahar H, Gardella TJ. Binding selectivity of abaloparatide for PTH-type-1-receptor conformations and effects on downstream signaling. Endocrinology. 2016;157(1):141–149. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1726.
    1. TYMLOS® (abaloparatide) injection, for subcutaneous use [package insert]. Waltham, MA: Radius Health, Inc.; 2017.
    1. Miller PD, Hattersley G, Riis BJ, et al. Effect of abaloparatide vs placebo on new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(7):722–733. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11136.
    1. Bone HG, Cosman F, Miller PD, et al. ACTIVExtend: 24 months of alendronate after 18 months of abaloparatide or placebo for postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(8):2949–2957. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00163.
    1. Cosman F, Miller PD, Williams GC, et al. Eighteen months of treatment with subcutaneous abaloparatide followed by 6 months of treatment with alendronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of the ACTIVExtend trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(2):200–210. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.009.
    1. Eastell R, Mitlak BH, Wang Y, Hu M, Fitzpatrick LA, Black DM. Bone turnover markers to explain changes in lumbar spine BMD with abaloparatide and teriparatide: results from ACTIVE. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30(3):667–673. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-04819-1.
    1. CDER. Patient-focused drug development. Updated April 21, 2020. . Accessed 11 Jan 2021.
    1. ICER. Value assessment framework: Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. Updated January 31, 2020. . Accessed 11 Jan 2021.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere