Safety profile of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: integrated analysis from the SELECT phase III clinical programme

Stanley B Cohen, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Kevin L Winthrop, Cristiano A F Zerbini, Yoshiya Tanaka, Louis Bessette, Ying Zhang, Nasser Khan, Barbara Hendrickson, Jeffrey V Enejosa, Gerd R Burmester, Stanley B Cohen, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Kevin L Winthrop, Cristiano A F Zerbini, Yoshiya Tanaka, Louis Bessette, Ying Zhang, Nasser Khan, Barbara Hendrickson, Jeffrey V Enejosa, Gerd R Burmester

Abstract

Objectives: This integrated analysis presents the safety profile of upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, at 15 mg and 30 mg once daily in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and laboratory data from five randomised, placebo- or active-controlled phase III trials of upadacitinib for patients with RA were analysed and summarised. Exposure-adjusted event rates are shown for placebo (three trials; 12/14 weeks), methotrexate (two trials; mean exposure: 36 weeks), adalimumab (one trial; mean exposure: 42 weeks), upadacitinib 15 mg (five trials; mean exposure: 53 weeks) and upadacitinib 30 mg (four trials; mean exposure: 59 weeks).

Results: 3834 patients received one or more doses of upadacitinib 15 mg (n=2630) or 30 mg (n=1204), for a total of 4020.1 patient-years of exposure. Upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis and urinary tract infection were the most commonly reported TEAEs with upadacitinib. Rates of serious infection were similar between upadacitinib 15 mg and adalimumab but higher compared with methotrexate. Rates of herpes zoster and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevations were higher in both upadacitinib groups versus methotrexate and adalimumab, and rates of gastrointestinal perforations were higher with upadacitinib 30 mg. Rates of deaths, malignancies, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) were similar across treatment groups.

Conclusion: In the phase III clinical programme for RA, patients receiving upadacitinib had an increased risk of herpes zoster and CPK elevation versus adalimumab. Rates of malignancies, MACEs and VTEs were similar among patients receiving upadacitinib, methotrexate or adalimumab.

Trial registration numbers: SELECT-EARLY: NCT02706873; SELECT-NEXT: NCT02675426; SELECT-COMPARE: NCT02629159; SELECT-MONOTHERAPY: NCT02706951; SELECT-BEYOND: NCT02706847.

Keywords: adalimumab; arthritis; methotrexate; rheumatoid.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SBC received grants and consultation fees from Amgen, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Pfizer, Roche and Sandoz. RFvV received grants from AbbVie, Arthrogen, BMS, GSK, Lilly, Pfizer and UCB and personal fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. KLW received consulting fees and research grants from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. CAFZ received research grants from Amgen, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier and Roche, participated on advisory boards and speaker’s bureau for Merck, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis and served as a consultant for Pfizer. YT received speaking fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Astellas, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and YL Biologics and received research grants from Asahi-Kasei, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda and UCB. LB received speaking fees, consulting fees and research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB. YZ, NK, BH and JVE are full-time employees of AbbVie and may hold AbbVie stock or stock options. GRB received speaking or consulting fees from AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and UCB.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Event rates for AESIs. Additional details on AESIs are included in the online supplemental material. Incidence rates are shown in online supplemental figure S1.*EAERs for active TB in E/100 PY: PBO, 0; MTX, 0; ADA, 0.2; UPA 15 mg, 0.1; UPA 30 mg, 0.1.†Including all potential GI perforations; EAERs for confirmed GI perforations in E/100 PY: PBO, 0; MTX, 0; ADA, 0; UPA 15 mg, <0.1; UPA 30 mg, 0.3.ADA, adalimumab; AESI, adverse event of special interest; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; E/100 PY, event per 100 patient-years; EAER, exposure-adjusted event rate; EOW, every other week; GI, gastrointestinal; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; MTX, methotrexate; NMSC, non-melanoma skin cancer; PBO, placebo; TB, tuberculosis; UPA, upadacitinib; VTE, venous thromboembolic event.

References

    1. Parmentier JM, Voss J, Graff C, et al. . In vitro and in vivo characterization of the JAK1 selectivity of upadacitinib (ABT-494). BMC Rheumatol 2018;2:23. 10.1186/s41927-018-0031-x
    1. US Food and Drug Administration Upadacitinib prescribing information. Available: [Accessed 22 Sept 2020].
    1. European Medicines Agency Upadacitinib summary of product characteristics. Available: [Accessed 22 Sep 2020].
    1. Burmester GR, Kremer JM, Van den Bosch F, et al. . Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2018;391:2503–12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31115-2
    1. Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Combe B, et al. . Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2018;391:2513–24. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31116-4
    1. Smolen JS, Pangan AL, Emery P, et al. . Upadacitinib as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate (SELECT-MONOTHERAPY): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study. Lancet 2019;393:2303–11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30419-2
    1. Fleischmann R, Pangan AL, Song I-H, et al. . Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1788–800. 10.1002/art.41032
    1. van Vollenhoven R, Takeuchi T, Pangan AL, et al. . Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib monotherapy in methotrexate-naïve patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (SELECT-EARLY): a randomized, double-blind, active-comparator, multi-center, multi-country trial. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020. [Epub ahead of print: 8 Jul 2020].
    1. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. . 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2569–81. 10.1002/art.27584
    1. van Vollenhoven R, Takeuchi T, Pangan AL, et al. . A phase 3, randomized, controlled trial comparing upadacitinib monotherapy to MTX monotherapy in MTX-naïve patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2018;70.
    1. Cohen SB, Tanaka Y, Mariette X, et al. . Long-term safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis up to 8.5 years: integrated analysis of data from the global clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1253–62. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210457
    1. Smolen JS, Genovese MC, Takeuchi T, et al. . Safety profile of baricitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with over 2 years median time in treatment. J Rheumatol 2019;46:7–18. 10.3899/jrheum.171361
    1. Wollenhaupt J, Lee E-B, Curtis JR, et al. . Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for up to 9.5 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: final results of a global, open-label, long-term extension study. Arthritis Res Ther 2019;21:89. 10.1186/s13075-019-1866-2
    1. FDA medical review December 11, 2009, Actemra® (tocilizumab) injection.
    1. FDA medical review reference ID: 3151008, Xeljanz® (tofacitinib) tablets.
    1. FDA clinical review reference ID: 3994713, Kevzara® (sarilumab) injection.
    1. Lee EB, Yamanaka H, Liu Y, et al. . Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients from the Asia-Pacific region: Post-hoc analyses of pooled clinical study data. Int J Rheum Dis 2019;22:1094–106. 10.1111/1756-185X.13516
    1. Tanaka Y, Atsumi T, Amano K, et al. . Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: subgroup analyses of four multinational phase 3 randomized trials. Mod Rheumatol 2018;28:583–91. 10.1080/14397595.2017.1392057
    1. Winthrop KL, Yamanaka H, Valdez H, et al. . Herpes zoster and tofacitinib therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:2675–84. 10.1002/art.38745
    1. Harigai M, Takeuchi T, Smolen JS, et al. . Safety profile of baricitinib in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with over 1.6 years median time in treatment: an integrated analysis of phases 2 and 3 trials. Mod Rheumatol 2020;30:36–43. 10.1080/14397595.2019.1583711
    1. Agency EM Baricitinib summary of product characteristics. Available: [Accessed 22 Sep 2020].
    1. Winthrop KL, Curtis JR, Lindsey S, et al. . Herpes zoster and tofacitinib: clinical outcomes and the risk of concomitant therapy. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017;69:1960–8. 10.1002/art.40189
    1. Holmqvist ME, Neovius M, Eriksson J, et al. . Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and association with disease duration and hospitalization. JAMA 2012;308:1350–6. 10.1001/2012.jama.11741
    1. Scott IC, Hider SL, Scott DL. Thromboembolism with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: how real is the risk? Drug Saf 2018;41:645–53. 10.1007/s40264-018-0651-5
    1. Kim SC, Schneeweiss S, Liu J, et al. . Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2013;65:NA–7. 10.1002/acr.22039
    1. Xie F, Yun H, Bernatsky S, et al. . Brief report: risk of gastrointestinal perforation among rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving tofacitinib, tocilizumab, or other biologic treatments. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:2612–7. 10.1002/art.39761
    1. Strangfeld A, Richter A, Siegmund B, et al. . Risk for lower intestinal perforations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab in comparison to treatment with other biologic or conventional synthetic DMARDs. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:504–10. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209773
    1. Schwartz DM, Kanno Y, Villarino A, et al. . JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017;16:843–62. 10.1038/nrd.2017.201
    1. Genovese MC, Smolen JS, Takeuchi T, et al. . Safety profile of baricitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis up to 6 years: an updated integrated safety analysis. Arthritis Rheum 2018;70.
    1. Queeney K, Housley W, Sokolov J, et al. . FRI0131 Elucidating the mechanism underlying creatine phosphokinase upregulation with upadacitinib. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:734–5.
    1. Tanaka Y A review of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 2020;30:779–87. 10.1080/14397595.2020.1782049
    1. European Medicines Agency Tofacitinib summary of product characteristics. Available: [Accessed 22 Sep 2020].
    1. US Food and Drug Administration Tofacitinib prescribing information. Available: [Accessed 22 Sep 2020].
    1. US Food and Drug Administration Baricitinib prescribing information. Available: [Accessed 22 Sep 2020].
    1. Winthrop KL The emerging safety profile of JAK inhibitors in rheumatic disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2017;13:234–43. 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.23

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere