Dynamic Indices Fail to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing One-Lung Ventilation for Thoracoscopic Surgery

Kwan-Hoon Choi, Jae-Kwang Shim, Dong-Wook Kim, Chun-Sung Byun, Ji-Hyoung Park, Kwan-Hoon Choi, Jae-Kwang Shim, Dong-Wook Kim, Chun-Sung Byun, Ji-Hyoung Park

Abstract

Thoracic surgery using CO2 insufflation maintains closed-chest one-lung ventilation (OLV) that may provide the necessary heart-lung interaction for the dynamic indices to predict fluid responsiveness. We studied whether pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) can predict fluid responsiveness during thoracoscopic surgery. Forty patients were enrolled in the study. OLV was performed with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg at a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O, while CO2 was insufflated to the contralateral side at 8 mm Hg. Patients whose stroke volume index (SVI) increased ≥15% after fluid challenge (7 mL/kg) were defined as fluid responders. The predictive ability of PPV and SVV on fluid responsiveness was investigated using the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUROC), which was also assessed according to the right or left lateral decubitus position considering the intrathoracic location of the right-sided superior vena cava. AUROCs of PPV and SVV for predicting fluid responsiveness were 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.47-0.83, p = 0.113) and 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.45-0.82, p = 0.147), respectively. The AUROCs of indices did not exhibit any statistical significance according to position. Dynamic indices of preload cannot predict fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation with CO2 gas insufflation.

Keywords: fluid responsiveness; pulse pressure variation; stroke volume variation; thoracoscopic surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
AUROC of dynamic indices before fluid challenge. (a) SVV; (b) PPV; (c) Right lateral decubitus SVV; (d) Right lateral decubitus PPV; (e) Left lateral decubitus SVV; (f) Left lateral decubitus PPV.

References

    1. Marik P.E., Cavallazzi R., Vasu T., Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit. Care Med. 2009;37:2642–2647. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da.
    1. Fu Q., Duan M., Zhao F., Mi W. Evaluation of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing protective one-lung ventilation. Drug Discov. Ther. 2015;9:296–302. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2015.01046.
    1. Jeong D.M., Ahn H.J., Park H.W., Yang M., Kim J.A., Park J. Stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation are not useful for predicting fluid responsiveness in thoracic surgery. Anesth. Analg. 2017;125:1158–1165. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002056.
    1. Lee J.H., Jeon Y., Bahk J.H., Gil N.S., Hong D.M., Kim J.H., Kim H.J. Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation for lung surgery using thoracotomy: Randomised controlled study. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2011;28:39–44. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834089cf.
    1. Piccioni F., Bernasconi F., Tramontano G.T.A., Langer M. A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2017;31:677–684. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9898-5.
    1. Ninomiya I., Okamoto K., Fushida S., Oyama K., Kinoshita J., Takamura H., Tajima H., Makino I., Miyashita T., Ohta T. Efficacy of co2 insufflation during thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left lateral position. Gen. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2017;65:587–593. doi: 10.1007/s11748-017-0816-7.
    1. Hill R.C., Jones D.R., Vance R.A., Kalantarian B. Selective lung ventilation during thoracoscopy: Effects of insufflation on hemodynamics. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996;61:945–948. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01150-1.
    1. Mesquida J., Kim H.K., Pinsky M.R. Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure, and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume, and intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1672–1679. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2304-3.
    1. Song Y., Kwak Y.L., Song J.W., Kim Y.J., Shim J.K. Respirophasic carotid artery peak velocity variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with coronary artery disease. Br. J. Anaesth. 2014;113:61–66. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu057.
    1. Muller L., Louart G., Bengler C., Fabbro-Peray P., Carr J., Ripart J., de La Coussaye J.E., Lefrant J.Y. The intrathoracic blood volume index as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure: A comparison with central venous pressure. Anesth. Analg. 2008;107:607–613. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817e6618.
    1. Monnet X., Marik P.E., Teboul J.L. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: An update. Ann. Intensive Care. 2016;6:111. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0216-7.
    1. Li C., Lin F.Q., Fu S.K., Chen G.Q., Yang X.H., Zhu C.Y., Zhang L.J., Li Q. Stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2013;10:148–155. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5293.
    1. Shin Y.H., Ko J.S., Gwak M.S., Kim G.S., Lee J.H., Lee S.K. Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:53–59. doi: 10.1002/lt.22186.
    1. Suehiro K., Okutani R. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2010;24:772–775. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.03.014.
    1. Suehiro K., Rinka H., Ishikawa J., Fuke A., Arimoto H., Miyaichi T. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing airway pressure release ventilation. Anaesth. Intensive Care. 2012;40:767–772. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1204000503.
    1. Assaad S., Kyriakides T., Tellides G., Kim A.W., Perkal M., Perrino A. Extravascular lung water and tissue perfusion biomarkers after lung resection surgery under a normovolemic fluid protocol. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2015;29:977–983. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.12.020.
    1. Levick J.R., Michel C.C. Microvascular fluid exchange and the revised starling principle. Cardiovasc. Res. 2010;87:198–210. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq062.
    1. Zhang Z., Lu B., Sheng X., Jin N. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Anesth. 2011;25:904–916. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1217-1.
    1. De Backer D., Heenen S., Piagnerelli M., Koch M., Vincent J.L. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: Influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:517–523. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2586-4.
    1. Fu Q., Zhao F., Mi W., Zhang H. Stroke volume variation fail to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy with one-lung ventilation using thoracotomy. Biosci. Trends. 2014;8:59–63. doi: 10.5582/bst.8.59.
    1. Pinsky M.R. Cardiopulmonary interactions: Physiologic basis and clinical applications. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2018;15:S45–S48. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-339FR.
    1. Berger D., Takala J. Determinants of systemic venous return and the impact of positive pressure ventilation. Ann. Transl. Med. 2018;6:350. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.05.27.
    1. Lohser J., Slinger P. Lung injury after one-lung ventilation: A review of the pathophysiologic mechanisms affecting the ventilated and the collapsed lung. Anesth. Analg. 2015;121:302–318. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000808.
    1. Terada T., Oiwa A., Maemura Y., Robert S., Kessoku S., Ochiai R. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: Estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2016;30:621–627. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9772-x.
    1. Smetkin A.A., Hussain A., Kuzkov V.V., Bjertnæs L.J., Kirov M.Y. Validation of cardiac output monitoring based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis vs transpulmonary thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Br. J. Anaesth. 2014;112:1024–1031. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet489.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere