Longitudinal inconsistencies in women's self-reports of lifetime experience of physical and sexual IPV: evidence from the MAISHA trial and follow-on study in North-western Tanzania

Tanya Abramsky, Sheila Harvey, Neema Mosha, Grace Mtolela, Andrew Gibbs, Gerry Mshana, Shelley Lees, Saidi Kapiga, Heidi Stöckl, Tanya Abramsky, Sheila Harvey, Neema Mosha, Grace Mtolela, Andrew Gibbs, Gerry Mshana, Shelley Lees, Saidi Kapiga, Heidi Stöckl

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is pervasive throughout the world, with profound consequences for women's health. Research to understand the extent, causes and consequences of IPV relies on self-reported data on violence, and yet there is a paucity of research into the consistency with which women report lifetime IPV over time.

Methods: We use data from the control group of the cluster randomised trial and a follow-on longitudinal study in Tanzania to examine discrepancies in women's reported experience of lifetime physical IPV and sexual IPV over three time-points (T0, T29, T53 months). Among those reporting lifetime history of IPV at T0, we calculate the proportion who subsequently report no lifetime history at T29 and/or T53 ('discrepant' reporting). We use logistic regression to explore associations between discrepant reporting and respondent baseline characteristics, the nature of their IPV experiences at baseline, and situational factors at T53.

Results: Complete IPV data were available for 301 women. At T0, 154 (51%) women reported lifetime history of physical IPV, of whom 62% gave a discrepant 'never' report in a subsequent round. Among 93 (31%) with lifetime history of sexual IPV at T0, 73% provided a subsequent discrepant report. 73% of women reported lifetime physical IPV, and 55% lifetime sexual IPV in at least one survey round. For both IPV outcomes, women were less likely to provide discrepant reports if they had recent IPV at baseline, poor mental health (T53) and poor communication with partner (T53). For physical IPV only, reduced discrepant reporting was also associated with baseline household-level financial hardship and more severe or extensive experience of IPV.

Conclusions: A large proportion of women provided discrepant reports over the course of the study. Prevalence estimates of lifetime IPV from one-off cross-sectional surveys are likely to be underestimates, biased towards more recent and severe cases. To improve the stability of IPV measures, researchers should explicitly clarify the meaning of reference periods such as 'ever', consider using shorter reference periods (e.g. past-year), and avoid filter questions that use positive reports of lifetime IPV as a gateway to asking about more recent experiences.

Trial registration: Maisha CRT01 registered at ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02592252, registered retrospectively (13/08/2015).

Keywords: Inconsistency; Intimate partner violence; Longitudinal; Measure; Reliability; Scale; Tanzania.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Data collection timeline

References

    1. World Health Organization. Violence Against Women Prevalence Estimates . Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. p. 2021.
    1. Campbell J, Jones AS, Dienemann J, Kub J, Schollenberger J, O'Campo P, et al. Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(10):1157–1163. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.10.1157.
    1. Devries KM, Mak JY, Bacchus LJ, Child JC, Falder G, Petzold M, et al. Intimate partner violence and incident depressive symptoms and suicide attempts: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001439.
    1. Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C. Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet. 2008;371(9619):1165–1172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60522-X.
    1. Dillon G, Hussain R, Loxton D, Rahman S. Mental and physical health and intimate partner violence against women: a review of the literature. Int J Family Med. 2013;2013:313909. doi: 10.1155/2013/313909.
    1. Jewkes R, Willan S, Heise L, Washington L, Shai N, Kerr-Wilson A, et al. Effective design and implementation elements in interventions to prevent violence against women and girls. Pretoria: 2020.
    1. World Health Organization . RESPECT women: Preventing violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
    1. Ellsberg M, Heise L. The challenge of defining and measuring violence in quantitative research. Researching Violence Against Women: A Practical Guide for Researchers and Activists. Washington DC, United States: World Health Organisation, PATH; 2005.
    1. Armstrong T, Wernke J, Medina K, Schafer J. Do partners agree about the occurrence of intimate partner violence? A review of the current literature. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2002;3:181–193. doi: 10.1177/15248380020033002.
    1. Yount K, Li L. Spousal disagreement in the reporting of physical violence against wives in Southern Egypt. J Fam Issues. 2012;33:1540–1563. doi: 10.1177/0192513X11424255.
    1. Halim N, Steven E, Reich N, Badi L, Messersmith L. Variability and validity of intimate partner violence reporting by couples in Tanzania. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0193253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193253.
    1. Jansen HAFM, Watts C, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Garcia-Moreno C. Interviewer training in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. Violence Against Women. 2004;10(7):831–849. doi: 10.1177/1077801204265554.
    1. Heise L, Hossain M. STRIVE technical brief: Measuring intimate partner violence. London, UK: 2017.
    1. Bonomi AE, Thompson RS, Anderson M, Rivara FP, Holt VL, Carrell D, et al. Ascertainment of intimate partner violence using two abuse measurement frameworks. Inj Prev. 2006;12(2):121–124. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.009563.
    1. Cook SL, Gidycz CA, Koss MP, Murphy M. Emerging issues in the measurement of rape victimization. Violence Against Women. 2011;17(2):201–218. doi: 10.1177/1077801210397741.
    1. Ellsberg M, Heise L, Pena R, Agurto S, Winkvist A. Researching domestic violence against women: methodological and ethical considerations. Stud Fam Plann. 2001;32(1):1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00001.x.
    1. Watts C, Heise L, Ellsberg M, Garcia-Moreno C. Putting women’s safety first: ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999.
    1. Barr AL, Knight L, Frana-Junior I, Allen E, Naker D, Devries KM. Methods to increase reporting of childhood sexual abuse in surveys: the sensitivity and specificity of face-to-face interviews versus a sealed envelope method in Ugandan primary school children. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0110-2.
    1. Garcia-Moreno CJ, H. Ellsberg, M. Heise, L. Watts, C. . WHO Multi-Country Study on Womens Health and Domestic Violence against women. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
    1. Harling G, Bountogo M, Sie A, Barnighausen T, Lindstrom DP. Nonverbal response cards reduce socially desirable reporting of violence among adolescents in rural burkina faso: a randomized controlled trial. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68(5):914–921. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.006.
    1. Morrison-Beedy D, Carey MP, Tu X. Accuracy of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) and self-administered questionnaires for the assessment of sexual behavior. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(5):541–552. doi: 10.1007/s10461-006-9081-y.
    1. Langhaug LF, Sherr L, Cowan FM. How to improve the validity of sexual behaviour reporting: systematic review of questionnaire delivery modes in developing countries. Tropical Med Int Health. 2010;15(3):362–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02464.x.
    1. Jaya, Hindin MJ, Ahmed S. Differences in young people's reports of sexual behaviors according to interview methodology: A randomized trial in India. American Journal of Public Health. 2008;98(1):169–74.
    1. Rathod SD, Minnis AM, Subbiah K, Krishnan S. ACASI and face-to-face interviews yield inconsistent estimates of domestic violence among women in India: The samata health study 2005–2009. J Interpers Violence. 2011;26(12):2437–2456. doi: 10.1177/0886260510385125.
    1. Fincher D, VanderEnde K, Colbert K, Houry D, Smith LS, Yount KM. Effect of face-to-face interview versus computer-assisted self-interview on disclosure of intimate partner violence among African American women in WIC clinics. J Interpers Violence. 2015;30(5):818–838. doi: 10.1177/0886260514536280.
    1. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1260–1269. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8.
    1. The DHS Program. Demographic and Health Surveys Domestic Violence Module, Model Household Questionnaire. 2019. . Accessed 26 July 2021.
    1. Nybergh L, Taft C, Krantz G. Psychometric properties of the WHO Violence Against Women instrument in a female population-based sample in Sweden: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2013;3(5).
    1. Schraiber LB, Latorre Mdo R, Franca I, Jr, Segri NJ, D'Oliveira AF. Validity of the WHO VAW study instrument for estimating gender-based violence against women. Rev Saude Publica. 2010;44(4):658–666. doi: 10.1590/S0034-89102010000400009.
    1. Thompson MP, Basile KC, Hertz MF, Sitterle D. Measuring intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration; a compendium of assessment tools. Atlanta, Georgia: CDC; 2006.
    1. Vega EM, O'Leary KD. Test-retest reliability of the revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) J Family Violence. 2007;22(8):703–708. doi: 10.1007/s10896-007-9118-7.
    1. Gibbs A, Pretorius L, Jewkes R. Test-retest stability of self-reported violence against women measures: results from the stepping stones and creating futures pilot. Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1671663. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1671663.
    1. Koss MP, Gidycz CA. Sexual experiences survey: reliability and validity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53(3):422–423. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.422.
    1. Loxton D, Powers J, Townsend N, Harris ML, Forder P. Longitudinal inconsistency in responses to survey items that ask women about intimate partner violence. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0835-4.
    1. Rowlands IJ, Holder C, Forder PM, Hegarty K, Dobson AJ, Loxton D. Consistency and inconsistency of young women's reporting of intimate partner violence in a population-based study. Violence Against Women. 2021;27(3–4):359–377. doi: 10.1177/1077801220908324.
    1. Palen LA, Smith EA, Caldwell LL, Flisher AJ, Wegner L, Vergnani T. Inconsistent reports of sexual intercourse among South African high school students. J Adolesc Health. 2008;42(3):221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.024.
    1. Crossley TF, Kennedy S. The reliability of self-assessed health status. J Health Econ. 2002;21(4):643–658. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00007-3.
    1. Kapiga S, Harvey S, Mshana G, Hansen C, Mtolela G, Madaha F, et al. A social empowerment intervention to prevent intimate partner violence against women in a microfinance scheme in Tanzania: findings from the MAISHA cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2019.
    1. Harvey S, Lees S, Mshana G, Pilger D, Hansen C, Kapiga S, et al. A cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact on intimate partner violence of a 10-session participatory gender training curriculum delivered to women taking part in a group-based microfinance loan scheme in Tanzania (MAISHA CRT01): study protocol. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0546-8.
    1. Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990;1(1):43–46. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00010.
    1. Langeland W, Smit JH, Merckelbach H, de Vries G, Hoogendoorn AW, Draijer N. Inconsistent retrospective self-reports of childhood sexual abuse and their correlates in the general population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50(4):603–612. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0986-x.
    1. Hepp U, Gamma A, Milos G, Eich D, Ajdacic-Gross V, Rossler W, et al. Inconsistency in reporting potentially traumatic events. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188:278–283. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.104.008102.
    1. Merrill KG, Smith SC, Quintero L, Devries KM. Measuring violence perpetration: Stability of teachers' self-reports before and after an anti-violence training in Cote d'Ivoire. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;109:104687.
    1. Fendrich M, Rosenbaum DP. Recanting of substance use reports in a longitudinal prevention study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;70(3):241–253. doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00010-3.
    1. Sokolovsky AW, Janssen T, Barnett NP, Colby SM, Bernstein MH, Hayes KL, et al. Adolescent recanting of alcohol use: A longitudinal investigation of time-varying intra-individual predictors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;193:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.035.
    1. Percy A, McAlister S, Higgins K, McCrystal P, Thornton M. Response consistency in young adolescents' drug use self-reports: a recanting rate analysis. Addiction. 2005;100(2):189–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00943.x.
    1. Shillington AM, Clapp JD, Reed MB. The stability of self-reported marijuana use across eight years of the national longitudinal survey of youth. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2011;20(5):407–420. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2011.614873.
    1. Dariotis JK, Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL, Astone NM, Sifakis F. What are the consequences of relying upon self-reports of sexually transmitted diseases? Lessons learned about recanting in a longitudinal study. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45(2):187–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.024.
    1. Thornberry T, Krohn M. The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In: Duffee D, McDowall D, Ostrom B, Crutchfield R, Mastrofski S, Mazerolle L, editors. Measurement and Analysis of Crime. 4. Washington DC: US Department of Justice; 2000. p. 33–81.
    1. Hart TC, Rennison CM, Gibson C. Revisiting respondent "fatigue bias" in the National Crime Victimization Survey. J Quant Criminol. 2005;21(3):345–363. doi: 10.1007/s10940-005-4275-4.
    1. Torche F, Warren JR, Halpern-Manners A, Valenzuela E. Panel conditioning in a longitudinal study of adolescents' substance use: evidence from an experiment. Soc Forces. 2012;90(3):891–918. doi: 10.1093/sf/sor006.
    1. Abramsky T, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, Devries K, Kiss L, Ellsberg M, et al. What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-109.
    1. Coll CVN, Ewerling F, Garcia-Moreno C, Hellwig F, Barros AJD. Intimate partner violence in 46 low-income and middle-income countries: an appraisal of the most vulnerable groups of women using national health surveys. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(1):e002208.
    1. Culverhouse R, Bucholz KK, Crowe RR, Hesselbrock V, Nurnberger JI, Jr, Porjesz B, et al. Long-term stability of alcohol and other substance dependence diagnoses and habitual smoking: an evaluation after 5 years. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(7):753–760. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.753.
    1. Fendrich M, Mackesy-Amiti ME. Decreased drug reporting in a cross-sectional student drug use survey. J Subst Abuse. 2000;11(2):161–172. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00018-3.
    1. Stanton CA, Papandonatos G, Lloyd-Richardson EE, Niaura R. Consistency of self-reported smoking over a 6-year interval from adolescence to young adulthood. Addiction. 2007;102(11):1831–1839. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01974.x.
    1. Jewkes R. Emotional abuse: a neglected dimension of partner violence. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):851–852. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61079-3.
    1. Mars B, Cornish R, Heron J, Boyd A, Crane C, Hawton K, et al. Using data linkage to investigate inconsistent reporting of self-harm and questionnaire non-response. Arch Suicide Res. 2016;20(2):113–141. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2015.1033121.
    1. Heise L, C P, C G-M, C C, Email Heise L, jhu l, et al. Measuring psychological abuse by intimate partners: Constructing a cross-cultural indicator for the Sustainable Development Goals. SSM Population Health. 2019:

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere