Effect of strength and proprioception training on eversion to inversion strength ratios in subjects with unilateral functional ankle instability

T W Kaminski, B D Buckley, M E Powers, T J Hubbard, C Ortiz, T W Kaminski, B D Buckley, M E Powers, T J Hubbard, C Ortiz

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the effect of six weeks of strength and proprioception training on eversion to inversion isokinetic strength ratios (E/I ratios) in subjects with unilateral functional ankle instability.

Methods: Thirty eight subjects were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: strength training (S); proprioception training (P); strength + proprioception training (B); control (C). Isokinetic strength was tested before and after training using a Kin Com 125 automatic positioning isokinetic dynamometer. Subtalar joint eversion and inversion motions were tested both concentrically and eccentrically through a range of motion involving 40 degrees. All peak torque and average torque values were normalised for body mass. E/I ratios were calculated from average torque and peak torque measures by taking the concentric eversion value and combining it with the eccentric inversion value. Data were analysed using a mixed model analysis of variance with repeated measures on the test factor. Average torque and peak torque E/I ratios at 30 and 120 degrees/s were analysed separately.

Results: There were no significant differences in average torque and peak torque E/I ratios of the functionally unstable ankle for any of the groups after training compared with before.

Conclusions: Six weeks of strength and proprioception training (either alone or combined) had no effect on isokinetic measures of strength in subjects with self reported unilateral functional instability. Further studies examining this agonist (concentric) to antagonist (eccentric) muscle group strength ratio are needed.

References

    1. J Athl Train. 1999 Jul;34(3):239-45
    1. Int J Sports Med. 1988 Apr;9(2):141-4
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Feb;73(2):305-12
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1988 May-Jun;16(3):234-7
    1. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995 Apr;21(4):206-15
    1. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999 Apr;9(2):104-9
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(4):246-51
    1. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995 Feb;21(2):90-3
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Jul-Aug;28(4):568-73
    1. Br J Sports Med. 1994 Jun;28(2):112-6
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1988 Mar-Apr;16(2):113-22
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;25(4):538-43
    1. Ergonomics. 2000 Oct;43(10):1603-9
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989 Aug;71(7):1075-81
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;85:50-8
    1. Br J Sports Med. 1996 Jun;30(2):151-5
    1. Phys Ther. 2001 Aug;81(8):1437-45
    1. Int J Sports Med. 1986 Oct;7(5):291-4
    1. J Athl Train. 1998 Oct;33(4):310-4
    1. Sports Med. 1997 Feb;23(2):69-74
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Dec;79(1):49-57
    1. Br J Sports Med. 1999 Aug;33(4):255-8
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;26(2):231-7
    1. Sports Med. 2000 May;29(5):361-71
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955 Dec;37-A(6):1237-43
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;29(1):25-30
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1984;52(2):139-55
    1. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1989 Jul;6(3):629-37
    1. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997 Aug;26(2):78-86
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1986 Nov-Dec;14(6):465-71
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965 Nov;47(4):678-85

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere