Cost-effective diagnostic checklists for meningitis in resource-limited settings

Abstract

Background: Checklists can standardize patient care, reduce errors, and improve health outcomes. For meningitis in resource-limited settings, with high patient loads and limited financial resources, central nervous system diagnostic algorithms may be useful to guide diagnosis and treatment. However, the cost effectiveness of such algorithms is unknown.

Methods: We used decision analysis methodology to evaluate the costs, diagnostic yield, and cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for adults with suspected meningitis in resource-limited settings with moderate/high HIV prevalence. We considered 3 strategies: (1) comprehensive "shotgun" approach of utilizing all routine tests; (2) "stepwise" strategy with tests performed in a specific order with additional tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics; (3) "minimalist" strategy of sequential ordering of high-yield tests only. Each strategy resulted in 1 of 4 meningitis diagnoses: bacterial (4%), cryptococcal (59%), TB (8%), or other (aseptic) meningitis (29%). In model development, we utilized prevalence data from 2 Ugandan sites and published data on test performance. We validated the strategies with data from Malawi, South Africa, and Zimbabwe.

Results: The current comprehensive testing strategy resulted in 93.3% correct meningitis diagnoses costing $32.00 per patient. A stepwise strategy had 93.8% correct diagnoses costing an average of $9.72 per patient, and a minimalist strategy had 91.1% correct diagnoses costing an average of $6.17 per patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $133 per additional correct diagnosis for the stepwise over minimalist strategy.

Conclusions: Through strategically choosing the order and type of testing coupled with disease prevalence rates, algorithms can deliver more care more efficiently. The algorithms presented herein are generalizable to East Africa and Southern Africa.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1

Sensitivity analysis based on increasing proportions of lumbar punctures (LP) performed in persons with suspected meningitis, who do not have meningitis (i.e. negative LP). As the proportion of negative LPs increase, the cost per diagnostic evaluation changes differently for each regimen. For the comprehensive strategy, where every test is performed, there is a direct 1:1 linear increase in costs per each meningitis diagnosis. For the minimalist and stepwise strategies, the diagnostic algorithms stop after the first two and three tests are negative, respectively. Thus as the proportion of normal LPs approach 50%, the additional cost per meningitis diagnosis is $2.78, $7.08, and $16.00 for the minimalist, stepwise, and comprehensive strategies over the base model.