A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis--a prospective study

Henna E Sammalkorpi, Panu Mentula, Ari Leppäniemi, Henna E Sammalkorpi, Panu Mentula, Ari Leppäniemi

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to construct a new scoring system for more accurate diagnostics of acute appendicitis. Applying the new score into clinical practice could reduce the need of potentially harmful diagnostic imaging.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled 829 adults presenting with clinical suspicion of appendicitis, including 392 (47%) patients with appendicitis. The collected data included clinical findings and symptoms together with laboratory tests (white cell count, neutrophil count and C-reactive protein), and the timing of the onset of symptoms. The score was constructed by logistic regression analysis using multiple imputations for missing values. Performance of the constructed score in patients with complete data (n = 725) was compared with Alvarado score and Appendicitis inflammatory response score.

Results: 343 (47%) of patients with complete data had appendicitis. 199 (58%) patients with appendicitis had score value at least 16 and were classified as high probability group with 93% specificity.Patients with score below 11 were classified as low probability of appendicitis. Only 4% of patients with appendicitis had a score below 11, and none of them had complicated appendicitis. In contrast, 207 (54%) of non-appendicitis patients had score below 11. There were no cases with complicated appendicitis in the low probability group. The area under ROC curve was significantly larger with the new score 0.882 (95% CI 0.858-0.906) compared with AUC of Alvarado score 0.790 (0.758-0.823) and Appendicitis inflammatory response score 0.810 (0.779-0.840).

Conclusions: The new diagnostic score is fast and accurate in categorizing patients with suspected appendicitis, and roughly halves the need of diagnostic imaging.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC-curves presenting the comparison of the new Adult Appendicitis Score (AUC 0.882 (95% CI 0.858 – 0.906)) compared with Alvarado score (AUC 0.790 (0.758 – 0.823)) and Appendicitis inflammatory response score (AUC 0.810 (0.779 – 0.840)).

References

    1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(5):910–925.
    1. Korner H, Sondenaa K, Soreide JA, Andersen E, Nysted A, Lende TH, Kjellevold KH. Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg. 1997;21(3):313–317. doi: 10.1007/s002689900235.
    1. Hoffmann J, Rasmussen OO. Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1989;76(8):774–779. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760803.
    1. Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD, Zane RD, Schiff GD, Hanson R, Baeyens PF, Khorasani R. Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology. 2010;256(2):460–465. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091570.
    1. Seetahal SA, Bolorunduro OB, Sookdeo TC, Oyetunji TA, Greene WR, Frederick W, Cornwell EE, Chang DC, Siram SM. Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample. Am J Surg. 2011;201(4):433–437. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.009.
    1. Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg. 2002;137(7):799–804. discussion 804.
    1. Blomqvist PG, Andersson RE, Granath F, Lambe MP, Ekbom AR. Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987–1996. Ann Surg. 2001;233(4):455–460. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200104000-00001.
    1. Rao PM. Imaging of acute right lower abdominal quadrant pain. Clin Radiol. 1998;53(9):639–649. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(98)80290-0.
    1. Cuschieri J, Florence M, Flum DR, Jurkovich GJ, Lin P, Steele SR, Symons RG, Thirlby R. The SCOAP Collaborative. The SCOAP Collaborative included. Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington state surgical care and outcomes assessment program. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):557–563.
    1. Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB, Cochran C, Dodd LG, Delong DM, Beam CA, Vaslef S. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology. 2010;254(2):460–468. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09082298.
    1. Wagner PL, Eachempati SR, Soe K, Pieracci FM, Shou J, Barie PS. Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: For whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact? Surgery. 2008;144(2):276–282. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.040.
    1. Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2001;136(5):556–562. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.5.556.
    1. Busch M, Gutzwiller FS, Aellig S, Kuettel R, Metzger U, Zingg U. In-hospital delay increases the risk of perforation in adults with appendicitis. World J Surg. 2011;35(7):1626–1633. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1101-z.
    1. Hall EJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(965):362–378. doi: 10.1259/bjr/01948454.
    1. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):557–564. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80993-3.
    1. Andersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg. 2008;32(8):1843–1849. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y.
    1. Chong CF, Thien A, Mackie AJ, Tin AS, Tripathi S, Ahmad MA, Tan LT, Ang SH, Telisinghe PU. Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J. 2011;52(5):340–345.
    1. Lintula H, Kokki H, Kettunen R, Eskelinen M. Appendicitis score for children with suspected appendicitis. A randomized clinical trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394(6):999–1004. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0425-0.
    1. Lintula H, Kokki H, Pulkkinen J, Kettunen R, Grohn O, Eskelinen M. Diagnostic score in acute appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Lintula score) for adults with suspected appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395(5):495–500. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0627-0.
    1. Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(6):877–881. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.32893.
    1. Kiely N, Williams N. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995;77(2):157.
    1. Lubin BH. In: Hematology of Infancy and Childhood. 3. Nathan DG, Oski FA, editor. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1987. Reference Values in Infancy and Childhood; pp. 1677–1697.
    1. Scholer SJ, Pituch K, Orr DP, Dittus RS. Clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain. Pediatrics. 1996;98(4 Pt 1):680–685.
    1. van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology. 2008;249(1):97–106. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071652.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere