Subcutaneous Sarilumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis who Previously Received Subcutaneous Sarilumab or Intravenous Tocilizumab: An Open-Label Extension of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Paul Emery, Hubert van Hoogstraten, Karthinathan Thangavelu, Erin Mangan, Gregory St John, Patrick Verschueren, Paul Emery, Hubert van Hoogstraten, Karthinathan Thangavelu, Erin Mangan, Gregory St John, Patrick Verschueren

Abstract

Objective: This post hoc analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of open-label sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who completed the phase III double-blind ASCERTAIN study (NCT01768572) and switched from intravenous (IV) tocilizumab to subcutaneous (SC) sarilumab, or who continued SC sarilumab in the open-label extension (OLE) study EXTEND (NCT01146652).

Methods: Patients who completed ASCERTAIN were eligible to enroll in EXTEND to receive sarilumab 200 mg SC every 2 weeks (Q2W). Safety and efficacy were reported through 96 weeks in the OLE in patients who switched from tocilizumab IV to sarilumab 200 mg SC Q2W, who switched from sarilumab 150 mg SC Q2W to sarilumab 200 mg SC Q2W, or who continued sarilumab 200 mg SC Q2W.

Results: Of 175 patients who completed ASCERTAIN, 168 (96%) enrolled in EXTEND, and 38 of these patients (23%) discontinued the OLE. Cumulative sarilumab exposure during follow-up was 273.7 patient-years. No new safety signals were identified, infections occurred at a rate of 59.9/100 patient-years, and there were no cases of grade 4 neutropenia. Efficacy-as assessed by Disease Activity Score (28 joints) based on C-reactive protein, Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores-was sustained over 96 weeks of follow-up when switching to, or continuing, sarilumab 200 mg SC Q2W.

Conclusion: Switching from IV to SC interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor therapy produced no new safety concerns, and clinical efficacy was sustained over 96 weeks of follow-up. These findings alleviate potential concerns over switching route of administration with interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor therapy for RA.

© 2020 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition through the OLE. Abbreviations: IV, intravenous; OLE, open‐label extension; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks; RCT, double‐blind randomized control phase; SC, subcutaneous. aPatients requesting discontinuation is not additive with the number of patients who discontinued.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean (±SE) efficacy scores from OLE baseline to week 96 in overall patient population (observed cases) for DAS28‐CRP (A, B), CDAI (C, D), and HAQ‐DI (E, F). Abbreviations: CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; DAS28‐CRP, Disease Activity Score (28 joints) based on C‐reactive protein; HAQ‐DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire‐Disability Index; IV, intravenous; OLE, open‐label extension; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks; SC, subcutaneous.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of patients (OC and ITT) who achieved disease activity thresholds at OLE baseline and sustained them following switch to open‐label sarilumab at OLE weeks 12 and 96. Abbreviations: CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; DAS28‐CRP, Disease Activity Score (28 joints) based on C‐reactive protein; ITT, intention‐to‐treat patient population; IV, intravenous; OC, observed case patient population; OLE, open‐label extension; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks; SC, subcutaneous. aUses the number of patients assessed at each time point as the denominator for the percentage of patients achieving disease activity thresholds at each time point. bUses the number of patients achieving disease activity thresholds at OLE baseline as the denominator for the percentage of patients achieving disease activity thresholds at each time point.

References

    1. Kevzara (sarilumab) injection, for subcutaneous use. Initial US approval. Silver Spring (MD): U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2017. URL: .
    1. Emery P, Rondon J, Parrino J, Lin Y, Pena‐Rossi C, van Hoogstraten H, et al. Safety and tolerability of subcutaneous sarilumab and intravenous tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019;58:849–58.
    1. Burmester GR, Lin Y, Mangan EK, van Hoogstraten H, Kimura T, Vargas JI, et al. Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis in the phase 3 monarch study, including subpopulations. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:849.
    1. Fleischmann R, van Adelsberg J, Lin Y, Castelar‐Pinheiro GD, Brzezicki J, Hrycaj P, et al. Sarilumab and nonbiologic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017;69:277–90.
    1. Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Kivitz AJ, Rell‐Bakalarska M, Martincova R, Fiore S, et al. Sarilumab plus methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:1424–37.
    1. Actemra (tocilizumab) injection for intravenous use injection, for subcutaneous use [package insert]. Silver Spring (MD): U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2017. URL: .
    1. Burmester GR, Lin Y, Patel R, van Adelsberg J, Mangan EK, Graham NM, et al. Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double‐blind, parallel‐group phase III trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:840–7.
    1. Wells AF, Parrino J, Mangan EK, Paccaly A, Lin Y, Xu C, et al. Immunogenicity of sarilumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were inadequate responders or intolerant to disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs. Rheumatol Ther 2019;6:339–52.
    1. Decision Resources Group . Rheumatoid arthritis: disease landscape & forecast (landscape and forecast series). 2017. URL: .
    1. Lauper K, Mongin D, Iannone F, Klami Kristianslund E, Kvien TK, Nordström D, et al. Comparative effectiveness of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in a pan‐European collaboration of registries. RMD Open 2018;4:e000809.
    1. Pivot X, Gligorov J, Muller V, Curigliano G, Knoop A, Verma S, et al. Patients' preferences for subcutaneous trastuzumab versus conventional intravenous infusion for the adjuvant treatment of her2‐positive early breast cancer: final analysis of 488 patients in the international, randomized, two‐cohort PrefHer study. Ann Oncol 2014;25:1979–87.
    1. Huynh TK, Ostergaard A, Egsmose C, Madsen OR. Preferences of patients and health professionals for route and frequency of administration of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Patient Pref Adherence 2014;8:93–9.
    1. Stoner KL, Harder H, Fallowfield LJ, Jenkins VA. Intravenous versus subcutaneous drug administration. Which do patients prefer? A systematic review. Patient 2015;8:145–53.
    1. Monti S, Breda S, Grosso V, Todoerti M, Montecucco C, Caporali R. Switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation of abatacept: different results in a series of 21 patients. J Rheumatol 2015;42:1993–4.
    1. Barton JL. Patient preferences and satisfaction in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic therapy. Patient Prefer Adherence 2009;3:335–44.
    1. Alten R, Krüger K, Rellecke J, Schiffner‐Rohe J, Behmer O, Schiffhorst G, et al. Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete‐choice approach. Patient Prefer Adherence 2016;10:2217–28.
    1. Jin JF, Zhu LL, Chen M, Xu HM, Wang HF, Feng XQ, et al. The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015;9:923–42.
    1. Edwards CJ, Williams EL. Patient preferences in choosing anti‐TNF therapies‐R1. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:1575–6.
    1. Desplats M, Pascart T, Jelin G, Norberciak L, Philippe P, Houvenagel E, et al. Are abatacept and tocilizumab intravenous users willing to switch for the subcutaneous route of administration? A questionnaire‐based study. Clin Rheumatol 2017;36:1395–400.
    1. Keystone EC, Kremer JM, Russell A, Box J, Abud‐Mendoza C, Elizondo MG, et al. Abatacept in subjects who switch from intravenous to subcutaneous therapy: results from the phase IIIb attune study. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:857–61.
    1. Darloy J, Segaud N, Salmon JH, Eschard JP, Goëb V, Deprez X, et al. Tocilizumab effectiveness after switching from intravenous to subcutaneous route in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the RoSwitch study. Rheumatol Ther 2019;6:61–75.
    1. Ogata A, Atsumi T, Fukuda T, Hirabayashi Y, Inaba M, Ishiguro N, et al. Sustainable efficacy of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67:1354–62.
    1. Mueller RB, Gengenbacher M, Richter S, Dudler J, Möller B, von Kempis J. Change from subcutaneous to intravenous abatacept and back in patients with rheumatoid arthritis as simulation of a vacation: a prospective phase IV, open‐label trial (A‐BREAK). Arthritis Res Ther 2016;18:88.
    1. Fleischmann R, Genovese MC, Lin Y, St John G, van der Heijde D, Wang S, et al. Long‐term safety of sarilumab in rheumatoid arthritis: an integrated analysis with up to 7 years’ follow‐up. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59:292–302.
    1. Kim GW, Lee NR, Pi RH, Lim YS, Lee YM, Lee JM, et al. Il‐6 inhibitors for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: past, present, and future. Arch Pharm Res 2015;38:575–84.
    1. Maini RN, Taylor PC, Szechinski J, Pavelka K, Broll J, Balint G, et al. Double‐blind randomized controlled clinical trial of the interleukin‐6 receptor antagonist, tocilizumab, in European patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an incomplete response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:2817–29.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere