Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China：protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

Jialei Xie, Ziyi Cheng, Tianchen Wu, Yuan Wei, Xiaoli Wang, Jialei Xie, Ziyi Cheng, Tianchen Wu, Yuan Wei, Xiaoli Wang

Abstract

Introduction: Complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies are often associated with high perinatal morbidity and mortality, some of which are severe enough to require a gestational reduction surgery to improve fetal survival and reduce disabilities. While radiofrequency ablation is currently the most commonly used procedure with higher fetal survival and fewer maternal and fetal complications compared with other surgical methods, the therapeutic effect of microwave ablation (MWA) is reported to be better, presumably due to the higher thermal effect and fewer restrictions. Currently there is limited evidence to prove the feasibility of MWA for selective reduction. The aim of this pilot study is to explore the feasibility, efficacy and safety of MWA reduction for severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies and may provide evidence for using the MWA in intrauterine surgeries extensively.

Methods and analysis: This is a study protocol for a parallel-design pilot randomised controlled trial. 60 eligible patients with severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies will be randomised in a ratio of 1:1 to MWA group and radiofrequency group. Patients will be followed up until 6 months of age of the retained fetal. The primary analysis will compare the rates of neonatal survival at 28 days to evaluate the effect of MWA. The study will also evaluate the safety profile of MWA including the occurrence of postoperative adverse events and maternal and fetal complications. Additional secondary outcomes to be explored include the condition of neonatal asphyxia and the growth of surviving fetus at 6 months. Outcomes will be analysed by both a frequentist and the Bayesian statistical approach.

Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the ethical review committee of the Peking University Third Hospital (Beijing, China). The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at relevant academic conferences.

Trial registration number: NCT04014452; Pre-results.

Keywords: fetal anomalies; microwave ablation; monochorionic pregnancy; selective fetal reduction.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study.

References

    1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, et al. . Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015;64:1–65.
    1. Sperling L, Kiil C, Larsen LU, et al. . Naturally conceived twins with monochorionic placentation have the highest risk of fetal loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:644–52. 10.1002/uog.3820
    1. Powers WF, Kiely JL. The risks confronting twins: a national perspective. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:456–61. 10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70211-X
    1. Hillman SC, Morris RK, Kilby MD. Co-twin prognosis after single fetal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:928–40. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822f129d
    1. Gratacós E, Ortiz JU, Martinez JM. A systematic approach to the differential diagnosis and management of the complications of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;32:145–55. 10.1159/000342751
    1. Lewi L, Deprest J, Hecher K. The vascular anastomoses in monochorionic twin pregnancies and their clinical consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:19–30. 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.025
    1. Deprest JA, Audibert F, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. . Bipolar coagulation of the umbilical cord in complicated monochorionic twin pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:340–5. 10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70221-3
    1. Livingston JC, Lim F-Y, Polzin W, et al. . Intrafetal radiofrequency ablation for twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP): a single-center experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:399.e1–3. 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.051
    1. Challis D, Gratacos E, Deprest JA. Cord occlusion techniques for selective termination in monochorionic twins. J Perinat Med 1999;27:327–38. 10.1515/JPM.1999.046
    1. Prefumo F, Cabassa P, Fichera A, et al. . Preliminary experience with microwave ablation for selective feticide in monochorionic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:470–1. 10.1002/uog.12286
    1. Stephenson CD, Temming LA, Pollack R, et al. . Microwave ablation for Twin-Reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a novel application of technology. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015;38:35–40. 10.1159/000369384
    1. Rossi AC, D'Addario V. Umbilical cord occlusion for selective feticide in complicated monochorionic twins: a systematic review of literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:123–9. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.039
    1. Gaerty K, Greer RM, Kumar S. Systematic review and metaanalysis of perinatal outcomes after radiofrequency ablation and bipolar cord occlusion in monochorionic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:637–43. 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.035
    1. Lu J, Ting YH, Law KM, et al. . Radiofrequency ablation for selective reduction in complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;34:211–6. 10.1159/000355406
    1. Sun L, Zou G, Yang Y, et al. . Risk factors for fetal death after radiofrequency ablation for complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 2018;38:499–503. 10.1002/pd.5269
    1. Meng X, Yuan P, Gong L, et al. . Forty-five consecutive cases of complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancy treated with microwave ablation: a single-center experience. Prenat Diagn 2019;39:293–8. 10.1002/pd.5423

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere