High failure rate of proximal femoral locking plates in fixation of trochanteric fractures

Shuangjian He, Bin Yan, Jian Zhu, Xiaoyi Huang, Jianning Zhao, Shuangjian He, Bin Yan, Jian Zhu, Xiaoyi Huang, Jianning Zhao

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to report our previous results of treatments for trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral locking plates (PFLP) and to analyze the underlying mechanisms and possible risk factors associated with the high failure rate of this technique.

Methods: From January 2010 to October 2014, 273 consecutive patients with trochanteric femoral fractures were identified, and 95 patients (with 97 fractures) ultimately met the inclusion criteria. Clinical records regarding demographic features and intraoperative data including total incision length, operation time, blood loss, and failures detected in radiographs were documented and assessed. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS 19.0 software.

Results: The stable group (AO/OTA 31 A1 and A2.1) had less blood loss than the unstable group (AO/OTA 31 A2.2, A2.3, and A3). The ultimate failure rate was 36% in 97 fractures. The obvious complications in this study included nonunion in 7 (7.2%) fractures, implant breakage in 4 (4.1%) fractures, varus deformity in 34 (35%) fractures, and loosening of the proximal femoral screw in 21 (21.6%) fractures. Six patients received reoperations. The total failure rate in the stable group was 17% and was 50% in the unstable group. In patients greater than 60 years old in the unstable group, the failure rate was 60.5%.

Conclusions: High failure rates of PFLP were observed in patients with trochanteric fracture, especially in patients who were greater than 60 years old with unstable fracture types. PFLP was not an appropriate treatment for trochanteric fractures.

Keywords: Complications; Hip fracture; Locking plate; Mechanical failure; Trochanteric fractures.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All clinical records and radiological data for this retrospective cohort study were approved by the ethical committee of Taxing People’s Hospital (No: 2016-0003). Informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A 75-year-old male with AO/OTA type 31A2.2 experienced plate breakage. a Radiograph after injury. b Postoperative radiograph showing good reduction and fixation with PFLP (1 week after surgery). c Plate breakage and varus collapse 16 weeks after surgery. d, e Postoperative radiograph and computed tomography (CT) showing nonunion (18 weeks after surgery). f Revision surgery of THA
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A 78-year-old male with AO/OTA type 31A3.3 experienced plate breakage. a, b Postoperative anterio-posterior and lateral radiographs. c Plate breakage and varus collapse 10 weeks after surgery. d Postoperative radiograph of revision surgery of PFNA
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A 79-year-old male with AO/OTA type 31A2.3 suffered mechanical failure and nonunion. a Postoperative radiograph showing loosening of proximal screws and varus collapse 36 weeks after surgery. b, c Postoperative radiograph showing that progressive loosening and penetration through femoral head of proximal femoral screws as well as shortening of femoral neck (44 and 56 weeks after surgery, respectively). d, e CT scan showing nonunion and penetration through femoral head (56 weeks after surgery). f Revision surgery of THA
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A 81-year-old female with AO/OTA type 31A2.1 experienced loosening of proximal screws. a Radiograph after injury. b Postoperative radiograph showing good reduction and fixation (1 week after surgery). c Ten weeks postoperative radiograph showing loosening of proximal femoral screws, loss of reduction and varus collapse. d Progressive loss of reduction, screws loosening and varus collapse (24 weeks after surgery)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A 71-year-old male with AO/OTA type 31A3.3 experienced plate breakage. a Radiograph after injury. b Postoperative radiograph showing good reduction and fixation with PFLP (1 week after surgery). c Plate breakage and varus collapse 36 weeks after surgery. d Seventy-two weeks postoperative radiograph showing malunion and varus deformity

References

    1. Shen Jie, Luo Fei, Sun Dong, Huang Qiang, Xu Jianzhong, Dong Shiwu, Xie Zhao. Mid-term results after treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures with percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) Injury. 2015;46(2):347–357. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.033.
    1. Miyamoto Ryan G., Kaplan Kevin M., Levine Brett R., Egol Kenneth A., Zuckerman Joseph D. Surgical Management of Hip Fractures: An Evidence-based Review of the Literature. I: Femoral Neck Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2008;16(10):596–607. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200810000-00005.
    1. Kaplan Kevin, Miyamoto Ryan, Levine Brett R., Egol Kenneth A., Zuckerman Joseph D. Surgical Management of Hip Fractures: An Evidence-based Review of the Literature. II: Intertrochanteric Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2008;16(11):665–673. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200811000-00007.
    1. Shoda E. Hip fracture - epidemiology, management and liaison service. Surgical treatment of femoral proximal fracture. Clin Calcium. 2015;25:565–75.
    1. Hou Zhenhai, Shi Jianguo, Ye Hong, Pan Zhijun. Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with percutaneous non-contact bridging plates. International Journal of Surgery. 2014;12(5):538–543. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.02.017.
    1. Haidukewych GJ. Intertrochanteric fractures: ten tips to improve results. J Bone Joint Surg (Am Vol). 2009;91:712–9.
    1. Anglen JO, Weinstein JN. Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database. J Bone Joint Surg (Am Vol) 2008;90:700–707. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00517.
    1. Calderón A, Ramos T, Vilchez F, Mendoza-Lemus O, Peña V, Cárdenas-Estrada E, Acosta-Olivo C. Proximal femoral intramedullary nail versus DHS plate for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective analysis. Acta Ortop Mex. 2013;27:236–9.
    1. Dhamangaonkar Anoop C, Joshi Deepak, Goregaonkar Arvind B, Tawari Akhil A. Proximal Femoral Locking Plate versus Dynamic Hip Screw for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2013;21(3):317–322. doi: 10.1177/230949901302100311.
    1. Asif N, Ahmad S, Qureshi OA, Jilani LZ, Hamesh T, Jameel T. Unstable intertrochanteric fracture fixation - is proximal femoral locked compression plate better than dynamic hip screw. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:RC9–RC13.
    1. Collinge CA, Hymes R, Archdeacon M, Streubel P, Obremskey W, Weber T, Watson JT, Lowenberg D, Members of the Proximal Femur Working Group of the Southeast Trauma Consortium. Unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates: a retrospective, multicenter study of 111 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:489–95.
    1. Streubel Philipp N., Moustoukas Michael J., Obremskey William T. Mechanical Failure After Locking Plate Fixation of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2013;27(1):22–28. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318251930d.
    1. Schneider Kerstin, Oh Jong-Keon, Zderic Ivan, Stoffel Karl, Richards R. Geoff, Wolf Stefan, Gueorguiev Boyko, Nork Sean E. What is the underlying mechanism for the failure mode observed in the proximal femoral locking compression plate? A biomechanical study. Injury. 2015;46(8):1483–1490. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.034.
    1. Hu S, Zhang S, Yu G. Treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fractures with proximal lateral femur locking plates. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. 2012;20:329–333. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000600003.
    1. Kumar Nishikant, Kataria Himanshu, Yadav Chandrashekhar, Gadagoli Bharath S., Raj Rishi. Evaluation of proximal femoral locking plate in unstable extracapsular proximal femoral fractures: Surgical technique & mid term follow up results. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2014;5(3):137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2014.07.009.
    1. Floyd MW, France JC, Hubbard DF. Early experience with the proximal femoral locking plate. Orthopedics. 2013;36:1488–1494. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20131120-11.
    1. Wirtz C, Abbassi F, Evangelopoulos DS, Kohl S, Siebenrock KA, Krüger A. High failure rate of trochanteric fracture osteosynthesis with proximal femoral locking compression plate. Injury-Int J Care Injured. 2013;44:751–756. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.02.020.
    1. Streubel Philipp N., Moustoukas Michael, Obremskey William T. Locked plating versus cephalomedullary nailing of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. 2016;26(4):385–390. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1743-5.
    1. Floyd JC, O'Toole RV, Stall A, Forward DP, Nabili M, Shillingburg D, Hsieh A, Nascone JW. Biomechanical comparison of proximal locking plates and blade plates for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:628–633. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181b04835.
    1. Lee PY, Lin KJ, Wei HW, Hu JJ, Chen WC, Tsai CL, Lin KP. Biomechanical effect of different femoral neck blade position on the fixation of intertrochanteric fracture: a finite element analysis. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2016;61:331–336. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2015-0091.
    1. Jiang W, Liu Y, Yang L, Xu W, Liu S, Zhang D, Chen X, Wang H. Biomechanical comparative study on proximal femoral locking plate and Gamma3 for treatment of stable intertrochanteric fracture. Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery. 2014;28:1096–1099.
    1. Pountos I, Giannoudis PV. The management of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:103–108. doi: 10.1016/j.mporth.2016.03.004.
    1. Sasnur PA. Surgical outcome of proximal femoral fractures using proximal femoral - locking compression plate. 2015.
    1. Wieser K, Babst R. Fixation failure of the LCP proximal femoral plate 4.5/5.0 in patients with missing posteromedial support in unstable per-, inter-, and subtrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:1281–1287. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1074-7.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere