Impact of alemtuzumab on health-related quality of life over 6 years in CARE-MS II trial extension patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Rafael Arroyo, Denise P Bury, Jennifer D Guo, David H Margolin, Maria Melanson, Nadia Daizadeh, David Cella, Rafael Arroyo, Denise P Bury, Jennifer D Guo, David H Margolin, Maria Melanson, Nadia Daizadeh, David Cella

Abstract

Background: In CARE-MS II (Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif® Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis; NCT00548405), alemtuzumab (12 mg/day; baseline: 5 days; 12 months later: 3 days) significantly improved health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients over 2 years. Patients completing CARE-MS II could enter a 4-year extension study (NCT00930553).

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess 6-year HRQL outcomes in alemtuzumab-treated CARE-MS II patients, including those with highly active disease (HAD).

Methods: During extension, patients could receive additional alemtuzumab for clinical/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity or other disease-modifying therapies per investigator's discretion. Assessments include Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and EQ-5D visual analog scale (EQ-VAS).

Results: Alemtuzumab-treated patients improved or stabilized all HRQL measures over 6 years with significant improvements from baseline at all time points on EQ-VAS and for up to 5 years on FAMS, SF-36 MCS, and SF-36 PCS. Alemtuzumab-treated patients with HAD showed significant improvements versus baseline at Year 2 on all HRQL measures, and significant improvements versus SC IFNB-1a on SF-36 PCS and EQ-VAS; however, the improvements did not reach the threshold for clinical relevance.

Conclusion: Alemtuzumab-treated CARE-MS II patients improved or stabilized HRQL versus baseline over 6 years. This is the first study to show long-term HRQL benefits in patients with HAD.

Keywords: Alemtuzumab; EQ-VAS; FAMS; SF-36; health-related quality of life; patient-reported outcomes; relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: R.A. and D.C. have nothing to disclose. D.P.B. is currently employed by Sanofi on a contract basis (RWE/COA/PRO group). J.D.G. was an employee of Sanofi at the time of the analysis and is currently employed at Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrence Township, NJ, USA. D.H.M. was an employee of Sanofi at the time of the analysis and is currently employed at Cerevance, Inc., Boston, MA, USA, and reports personal fees from Sanofi outside the submitted work; in addition, he has patents US9664688 and US009498528 issued. M.M. and N.D. are employees of Sanofi.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Change from baseline in HRQL over 6 years in RRMS patients from CARE-MS II. Change from core study baseline in (a) FAMS total, (b) SF-36 MCS, (c) SF-36 PCS, and (d) EQ-VAS scores. FAMS and EQ-VAS were administered at baseline (Month 0), every 6 months thereafter up to Year 3, and every 12 months from Years 3 to 6. The SF-36 was administered at baseline (Month 0), every 12 months thereafter up to Year 2, every 6 months from Years 2 to 3, and every 12 months from Years 3 to 6. CARE-MS: Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif® Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis; CI: confidence interval; EQ-VAS: European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3-level visual analog scale; FAMS: Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis, version 4; HRQL: health-related quality of life; MCS: mental component summary; PCS: physical component summary; RRMS: relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SC IFNB-1a: subcutaneous interferon beta-1a; SD: standard deviation; SF-36: 36-Item Short-Form Survey, version 2. aData are least-squares means (95% CIs). bAlemtuzumab baseline mean (SD) scores: FAMS total score, 119.1 (31.6); SF-36 MCS score, 44.9 (11.8); SF-36 PCS score, 42.7 (10.2); EQ-VAS score, 70.1 (19.1). *p < 0.05 versus baseline (alemtuzumab-treated patients). †p < 0.05 versus SC IFNB-1a.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Change from baseline in HRQL over 6 years in the HAD subpopulation of RRMS patients from CARE-MS II. Change from core study baseline in (a) FAMS total, (b) SF-36 MCS, (c) SF-36 PCS, and (d) EQ-VAS scores. FAMS and EQ-VAS were administered at baseline (Month 0), every 6 months thereafter up to Year 3, and every 12 months from Years 3 to 6. The SF-36 was administered at baseline (Month 0), every 12 months thereafter up to Year 2, every 6 months from Years 2 to 3, and every 12 months from Years 3 to 6. CARE-MS: Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif® Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis; CI: confidence interval; EQ-VAS: European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3-level visual analog scale; FAMS: Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis, version 4; HAD: highly active disease; HRQL: health-related quality of life; MCS: mental component summary; PCS: physical component summary; RRMS: relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SC IFNB-1a: subcutaneous interferon beta-1a; SD: standard deviation; SF-36: 36-Item Short-Form Survey, version 2. aData are least-squares means (95% CIs). bAlemtuzumab baseline mean (SD) score: FAMS total score, 122.0 (29.1); SF-36 MCS score, 45.0 (11.6); SF-36 PCS score, 43.3 (9.7); and EQ-VAS score, 72.0 (17.4). *p < 0.05 versus baseline. †p < 0.05 versus SC IFNB-1a.

References

    1. Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 (GBD 2015) Incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability 1990–2015. Seattle, WA: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2016.
    1. Multiple sclerosis: Hope through research. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 2012.
    1. Confavreux C, Vukusic S. The natural history of multiple sclerosis. Rev Prat 2006; 56: 1313–1320.
    1. Scalfari A, Neuhaus A, Degenhardt A, et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis, a geographically based study 10: Relapses and long-term disability. Brain 2010; 133: 1914–1929.
    1. Dubey D, Cano CA, Stuve O. Intractable and highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis—role of alemtuzumab. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2015; 11: 2405–2414.
    1. Fernández Ó. Is there a change of paradigm towards more effective treatment early in the course of apparent high-risk MS? Mult Scler Relat Disord 2017; 17: 75–83.
    1. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness of drug therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, 2013,
    1. Tramacere I, Del Giovane C, Salanti G, et al. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (9): CD011381.
    1. Coles AJ, Twyman CL, Arnold DL, et al. Alemtuzumab for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after disease-modifying therapy: A randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2012; 380(9856): 1829–1839.
    1. Coles AJ, Cohen JA, Fox EJ, et al. Alemtuzumab CARE-MS II 5-year follow-up: Efficacy and safety findings. Neurology 2017; 89: 1117–1126.
    1. Ziemssen T, Thomas K. Alemtuzumab in the long-term treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: An update on the clinical trial evidence and data from the real world. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2017; 10(10): 343–359.
    1. Mayer L, Fox E, LaGanke C, et al. Incidence of infusion-associated reactions decreases with subsequent courses of alemtuzumab: 5-year data from the CARE-MS extension study. Int J MS Care 2016; 18(s1): 1–112
    1. Wray S, Havrdova E, Snydman DR, et al. Infection risk with alemtuzumab decreases over time: Pooled analysis of 6-year data from the CAMMS223, CARE-MS I, and CARE-MS II studies and the CAMMS03409 extension study. Mult Scler 2019; 25:1605–1617.
    1. Cuker A, Bass A, Nadj C, et al. Immune thrombocytopenia in alemtuzumab-treated MS patients: Incidence, detection, and management. Mult Scler 2020; 26: 48–56.
    1. Phelps R, Winston J, Wynn D, et al. Incidence, management, and outcomes of autoimmune nephropathies following alemtuzumab treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2019; 25(9): 1273–1288.
    1. González RA, Kita M, Crayton H, et al. Alemtuzumab improves quality-of-life outcomes compared with subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2016: 23: 1367–1376.
    1. Singer B, Krieger S, Berkovich R, et al. Patients who had highly active RRMS and an inadequate response to prior therapy demonstrated durable efficacy with alemtuzumab: 5-year follow-up of the CARE-MS II study (p6.164). Neurology 2016; 86,
    1. Cella DF, Dineen K, Arnason B, et al. Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument. Neurology 1996; 47: 129–139.
    1. Sloan JA, Cella D, Hays RD. Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: Another step toward consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58(12): 1217–1219.
    1. Ware J, Kosinski M, Bjorner J, et al. Determining important differences in scores. User’s manual for the Sf-36v2® Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2007, pp. 125–133.
    1. Johnston BC, Ebrahim S, Carrasco-Labra A, et al. Minimally important difference estimates and methods: A protocol. BMJ Open 2015; 5(10): e007953.
    1. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41(5): 582–592.
    1. Rudick RA, Miller D, Hass S, et al. Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Effects of natalizumab. Ann Neurol 2007; 62(4): 335–346.
    1. Van Reenen M, Oppe M. EQ-5D-3L User Guide. Rotterdam: EuroQol Research Foundation, 2015.
    1. Ziemssen T, Hillert J, Butzkueven H. The importance of collecting structured clinical information on multiple sclerosis. BMC Med 2016; 14: 81.
    1. Zwibel HL. Contribution of impaired mobility and general symptoms to the burden of multiple sclerosis. Adv Ther 2009; 26(12): 1043–1057.
    1. Steinman L, Wang H, Liu Y, et al. Defining clinical meaning of patient-reported outcomes with disability assessment in multiple sclerosis: An analysis of the CARE-MS II Study. Mult Scler 2014; 20(Suppl. 1): P802.
    1. Svenningsson A, Falk E, Celius EG, et al. Natalizumab treatment reduces fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Results from the TYNERGY trial; a study in the real life setting. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(3): e58643.
    1. Hersh CM, Hara-Cleaver C, Rudick RA, et al. Experience with fingolimod in clinical practice. Int J Neurosci 2015; 125: 678–685.
    1. Technology appraisal guidance [TA127]: Natalizumab for the treatment of adults with highly active relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, (2007, accessed 25 August 2017).
    1. Gilenya: European public assessment report—Product information, (2011, accessed 25 August 2017).
    1. Derfuss T, Bergvall NK, Sfikas N, et al. Efficacy of fingolimod in patients with highly active relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 2015; 31(9): 1687–1691.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere