Ponatinib, chemotherapy, and transplant in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Josep-Maria Ribera, Olga García-Calduch, Jordi Ribera, Pau Montesinos, Isabel Cano-Ferri, Pilar Martínez, Jordi Esteve, Daniel Esteban, María García-Fortes, Natalia Alonso, José González-Campos, Arancha Bermúdez, Anna Torrent, Eulàlia Genescà, Santiago Mercadal, Joaquín Martínez-Lopez, Ramón García-Sanz, Josep-Maria Ribera, Olga García-Calduch, Jordi Ribera, Pau Montesinos, Isabel Cano-Ferri, Pilar Martínez, Jordi Esteve, Daniel Esteban, María García-Fortes, Natalia Alonso, José González-Campos, Arancha Bermúdez, Anna Torrent, Eulàlia Genescà, Santiago Mercadal, Joaquín Martínez-Lopez, Ramón García-Sanz

Abstract

Promising results have been shown with the combination of ponatinib and chemotherapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). The PONALFIL (Ponatinib With Chemotherapy for Young Adults Ph Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia) trial combined ponatinib (30 mg/d) with standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) in newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL patients aged 18 to 60 years. Ponatinib was only given pre-emptively after alloHSCT. Primary end points were hematologic and molecular response before alloHSCT and event-free survival (EFS), including molecular relapse as event. Thirty patients (median age, 49 years; range, 19-59 years) entered the trial. All exhibited hematologic response, and alloHSCT was performed in 26 patients (20 in complete molecular response and 6 in major molecular response). Only 1 patient died (of graft-versus-host disease), and 5 patients exhibited molecular relapse after alloHSCT. No tyrosine kinase inhibitor was given after HSCT in 18 of 26 patients. Twenty-nine patients are alive (median follow-up, 2.1 years; range, 0.2-4.0 years), with 3-year EFS and overall survival (OS) of 70% (95% confidence interval, 51-89) and 96% (95% confidence interval, 89-100), respectively. Comparison of the PONALFIL and the ALLPh08 (Chemotherapy and Imatinib in Young Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Ph [BCR-ABL] Positive; same schedule, using imatinib as the tyrosine kinase inhibitor) trials by propensity score showed significant improvement in OS for patients in PONALFIL (3-year OS, 96% vs 53%; P = .002). The most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events were hematologic (42%), infectious (17%), and hepatic (22%), with only one vascular occlusive event. The combination of chemotherapy with ponatinib followed by alloHSCT is well tolerated, with encouraging EFS in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. Cross-trial comparison suggests improvement vs imatinib (clinicaltrials.gov identifier #NCT02776605).

© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient disposition. GVHD, graft-versus-host disease.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
EFS and OS. (A) EFS for patients included in the PONALFIL trial from enrollment to failure of achieving CHR at week 6, lack of molecular response before HSCT, molecular or hematologic relapse or death by any cause. (B) OS for patients form diagnosis to death or last follow-up.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
OS of PONALFIL vs ALLPh08 trials by propensity score matching.

References

    1. Chiaretti S, Vitale A, Cazzaniga G, et al. . Clinico-biological features of 5202 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia enrolled in the Italian AIEOP and GIMEMA protocols and stratified in age cohorts. Haematologica. 2013;98(11):1702-1710.
    1. Fielding AK, Rowe JM, Buck G, et al. . UKALLXII/ECOG2993: addition of imatinib to a standard treatment regimen enhances long-term outcomes in Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2014;123(6):843-850.
    1. Ribera JM, Oriol A, González M, et al. ; Grupo Español de Trasplante Hemopoyético Groups . Concurrent intensive chemotherapy and imatinib before and after stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Final results of the CSTIBES02 trial. Haematologica. 2010;95(1):87-95.
    1. Daver N, Thomas D, Ravandi F, et al. . Final report of a phase II study of imatinib mesylate with hyper-CVAD for the front-line treatment of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2015;100(5):653-661.
    1. Chiaretti S, Vitale A, Vignetti M, et al. . A sequential approach with imatinib, chemotherapy and transplant for adult Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia: final results of the GIMEMA LAL 0904 study. Haematologica. 2016;101(12):1544-1552.
    1. Chalandon Y, Thomas X, Hayette S, et al. ; Group for Research on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GRAALL) . Randomized study of reduced-intensity chemotherapy combined with imatinib in adults with Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia [published correction appears in Blood. 2015;126(10):1261]. Blood. 2015;125(24):3711-3719.
    1. Foà R, Vitale A, Vignetti M, et al. ; GIMEMA Acute Leukemia Working Party . Dasatinib as first-line treatment for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2011;118(25):6521-6528.
    1. Ravandi F, Othus M, O’Brien SM, et al. . US intergroup study of chemotherapy plus dasatinib and allogeneic stem cell transplant in Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL. Blood Adv. 2016;1(3):250-259.
    1. Sugiura I, Doki N, Hata T, et al. . Dasatinib-based 2-step induction for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2022;6(2):624-636.
    1. Kim DY, Joo YD, Lim SN, et al. ; Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Working Party of the Korean Society of Hematology . Nilotinib combined with multiagent chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2015;126(6):746-756.
    1. Foà R, Bassan R, Vitale A, et al. ; GIMEMA Investigators . Dasatinib-blinatumomab for Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(17):1613-1623.
    1. Short NJ, Kantarjian H, Konopleva M, et al. . Updated results of a phase II study of ponatinib and blinatumomab for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2021;138(suppl 1):2298.
    1. O’Hare T, Deininger MW, Eide CA, Clackson T, Druker BJ. Targeting the BCR-ABL signaling pathway in therapy-resistant Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(2):212-221.
    1. Parker WT, Yeung DT, Yeoman AL, et al. . The impact of multiple low-level BCR-ABL1 mutations on response to ponatinib. Blood. 2016;127(15):1870-1880.
    1. Cortes JE, Kim DW, Pinilla-Ibarz J, et al. . Ponatinib efficacy and safety in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia: final 5-year results of the phase 2 PACE trial. Blood. 2018;132(4):393-404.
    1. Jabbour E, Short NJ, Ravandi F, et al. . Combination of hyper-CVAD with ponatinib as first-line therapy for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: long-term follow-up of a single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5(12):e618-e627.
    1. Sasaki K, Jabbour EJ, Ravandi F, et al. . Hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib versus hyper-CVAD plus dasatinib as frontline therapy for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a propensity score analysis. Cancer. 2016;122(23):3650-3656.
    1. Martinelli G, Papayannidis C, Piciocchi A, et al. . INCB84344-201: ponatinib and steroids in frontline therapy for unfit patients with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2022;6(6):1742-1753.
    1. Ribera JM, García O, Montesinos P, et al. . Treatment of young patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia using increased dose of imatinib and deintensified chemotherapy before allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2012;159(1):78-81.
    1. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41-55.
    1. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399-424.
    1. Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Ravandi F, et al. . Combination of hyper-CVAD with ponatinib as first-line therapy for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(15):1547-1555.
    1. Sasaki Y, Kantarjian HM, Short NJ, et al. . Genetic correlates in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with Hyper-CVAD plus dasatinib or ponatinib [published correction appears in Leukemia. 2022;36(5):1448]. Leukemia. 2022;36(5):1253-1260.
    1. Advani A, Moseley A, O’Dwyer K, et al. . A phase 2 study of dasatinib, prednisone, and blinatumomab for older patients with Philadelphia-chromosome (Ph) positive or Ph-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (with dasatinib sensitive fusions/mutations). Blood. 2021;138(suppl 1):3397.
    1. Chiaretti S, Bassan R, Vitale A, et al. . Updated results of the GIMEMA LAL2116, D-ALBA trial, for newly diagnosed adults with Ph+ ALL. HemaSphere. 2021;S2. Abstract S112.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere