Randomized Controlled Study of a Remote Flipped Classroom Neuro-otology Curriculum

Frederick Robert Carrick, Mahera Abdulrahman, Ahmed Hankir, Maksim Zayaruzny, Kinda Najem, Palita Lungchukiet, Roger A Edwards, Frederick Robert Carrick, Mahera Abdulrahman, Ahmed Hankir, Maksim Zayaruzny, Kinda Najem, Palita Lungchukiet, Roger A Edwards

Abstract

Context: Medical Education can be delivered in the traditional classroom or via novel technology including an online classroom.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that learning in an online classroom would result in similar outcomes as learning in the traditional classroom when using a flipped classroom pedagogy.

Design: Randomized controlled trial. A total of 274 subjects enrolled in a Neuro-otology training program for non-Neuro-otologists of 25 h held over a 3-day period. Subjects were randomized into a "control" group attending a traditional classroom and a "trial" group of equal numbers participating in an online synchronous Internet streaming classroom using the Adobe Connect e-learning platform.

Interventions: Subjects were randomized into a "control" group attending a traditional classroom and a "treatment" group of equal numbers participating in an online synchronous Internet streaming classroom.

Main outcome measures: Pre- and post-multiple choice examinations of VOR, Movement, Head Turns, Head Tremor, Neurodegeneration, Inferior Olivary Complex, Collateral Projections, Eye Movement Training, Visual Saccades, Head Saccades, Visual Impairment, Walking Speed, Neuroprotection, Autophagy, Hyperkinetic Movement, Eye and Head Stability, Oscilllatory Head Movements, Gaze Stability, Leaky Neural Integrator, Cervical Dystonia, INC and Head Tilts, Visual Pursuits, Optokinetic Stimulation, and Vestibular Rehabilitation.

Methods: All candidates took a pretest examination of the subject material. The 2-9 h and 1-8 h sessions over three consecutive days were given live in the classroom and synchronously in the online classroom using the Adobe Connect e-learning platform. Subjects randomized to the online classroom attended the lectures in a location of their choice and viewed the sessions live on the Internet. A posttest examination was given to all candidates after completion of the course. Two sample unpaired t tests with equal variances were calculated for all pretests and posttests for all groups including gender differences.

Results: All 274 subjects demonstrated statistically significant learning by comparison of their pre- and posttest scores. There were no statistically significant differences in the test scores between the two groups of 137 subjects each (0.8%, 95% CI 85.45917-86.67952; P = 0.9195). A total of 101 males in the traditional classroom arm had statistically significant lower scores than 72 females (0.8%, 95% CI 84.65716-86.53096; P = 0.0377) but not in the online arm (0.8%, 95% CI 85.46172-87.23135; P = 0.2176) with a moderate effect size (Cohen's d = -0.407).

Conclusion: The use of a synchronous online classroom in neuro-otology clinical training has demonstrated similar outcomes to the traditional classroom. The online classroom is a low cost and effective complement to medical specialty training in Neuro-Otology. The significant difference in outcomes between males and females who attended the traditional classroom suggests that women may do better than males in this learning environment, although the effect size is moderate.

Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03079349.

Keywords: classroom learning; flipped classroom; medical education; neuro-otology; online learning.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT study flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box plots of pre- and post-scores for all subjects.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box plots of pre- and post-scores for all subjects and by gender.

References

    1. Youngkin CA. Web-based technologies for health sciences reference and instruction. Med Ref Serv Q (2014) 33:283–91.10.1080/02763869.2014.925673
    1. Youngkin CA. The flipped classroom: practices and opportunities for health sciences librarians. Med Ref Serv Q (2014) 33:367–74.10.1080/02763869.2014.957073
    1. Woodruff AE, Jensen M, Loeffler W, Avery L. Advanced screencasting with embedded assessments in pathophysiology and therapeutics course modules. Am J Pharm Educ (2014) 78:128.10.5688/ajpe786128
    1. Lackey AE, Pandey T, Moshiri M, Lalwani N, Lall C, Bhargava P. Productivity, part 2: cloud storage, remote meeting tools, screencasting, speech recognition software, password managers, and online data backup. J Am Coll Radiol (2014) 11:580–8.10.1016/j.jacr.2013.11.021
    1. Louw VJ, Nel MM, Hay JF. Factors affecting the current status of transfusion medicine education in South Africa. Transfus Apher Sci (2013) 49:665–72.10.1016/j.transci.2013.05.003
    1. Razik R, Mammo Z, Gill HS, Lam WC. Academic screencasting: Internet-based dissemination of ophthalmology grand rounds. Can J Ophthalmol (2011) 46:72–6.10.3129/i10-093
    1. Tainter CR, Wong NL, Cudemus-Deseda GA, Bittner EA. The “flipped classroom” model for teaching in the intensive care unit: rationale, practical considerations, and an example of successful implementation. J Intensive Care Med (2016).
    1. Veeramani R, Madhugiri VS, Chand P. Perception of MBBS students to “flipped class room” approach in neuroanatomy module. Anat Cell Biol (2015) 48:138–43.10.5115/acb.2015.48.2.138
    1. Moffett J. Twelve tips for “flipping” the classroom. Med Teach (2015) 37:331–6.10.3109/0142159X.2014.943710
    1. McLean S, Attardi SM, Faden L, Goldszmidt M. Flipped classrooms and student learning: not just surface gains. Adv Physiol Educ (2016) 40:47–55.10.1152/advan.00098.2015
    1. Tan E, Brainard A, Larkin GL. Acceptability of the flipped classroom approach for in-house teaching in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Australas (2015) 27:453–9.10.1111/1742-6723.12454
    1. Morgan H, McLean K, Chapman C, Fitzgerald J, Yousuf A, Hammoud M. The flipped classroom for medical students. Clin Teach (2015) 12:155–60.10.1111/tct.12328
    1. Orndorff B, Waite G. Interactive remote medical curriculum through creative technology integration – biomed 2013. Biomed Sci Instrum (2013) 49:201–8.
    1. Irizarry D, Wadman MC, Bernhagen MA, Miljkovic N, Boedeker BH. Using the battlefield telemedicine system (BTS) to train deployed medical personnel in complicated medical tasks – a proof of concept. Stud Health Technol Inform (2012) 173:215–7.
    1. Erickson D, Greer L, Belard A, Tinnel B, O’Connell J. A hybrid integrated services digital network-Internet protocol solution for resident education. Telemed J E Health (2010) 16:454–60.10.1089/tmj.2009.0132
    1. Tolsgaard MG, Ku C, Woods NN, Kulasegaram KM, Brydges R, Ringsted C. Quality of randomised controlled trials in medical education reported between 2012 and 2013: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open (2014) 4:e005155.10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005155
    1. Salazar J. Staying connected: online education engagement and retention using educational technology tools. Clin Lab Sci (2010) 23:3–53–8.
    1. Adobe Connect Learning Systems. (2017). Available from:
    1. Nebeker CA, Basson MD, Haan PS, Davis AT, Ali M, Gupta RN, et al. Do female surgeons learn or teach differently? Am J Surg (2017) 213:282–7.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.010
    1. Ali A, Subhi Y, Ringsted C, Konge L. Gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills: a systematic review. Surg Endosc (2015) 29:3065–73.10.1007/s00464-015-4092-2
    1. Rocha-Pereira N, Lafferty N, Nathwani D. Educating healthcare professionals in antimicrobial stewardship: can online-learning solutions help? J Antimicrob Chemother (2015) 70:3175–7.10.1093/jac/dkv336
    1. Barsness K. Simulation-based education and performance assessments for pediatric surgeons. Eur J Pediatr Surg (2014) 24:303–7.10.1055/s-0034-1386650
    1. Mustafa AG, Allouh MZ, Mustafa IG, Hoja IM. Anatomy learning styles and strategies among Jordanian and Malaysian medical students: the impact of culture on learning anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat (2013) 35:435–41.10.1007/s00276-012-1067-z
    1. Noonan P. Using concept maps in perioperative education. AORN J (2011) 94:469–78.10.1016/j.aorn.2011.02.013
    1. McKinney AA, Page K. Podcasts and videostreaming: useful tools to facilitate learning of pathophysiology in undergraduate nurse education? Nurse Educ Pract (2009) 9:372–6.10.1016/j.nepr.2008.11.003
    1. Lim SJ, Khan AM, De Silva M, Lim KS, Hu Y, Tan CH, et al. The implementation of e-learning tools to enhance undergraduate bioinformatics teaching and learning: a case study in the National University of Singapore. BMC Bioinformatics (2009) 10(Suppl 15):S12.10.1186/1471-2105-10-S15-S12
    1. Silk H, Agresta T, Weber CM. A new way to integrate clinically relevant technology into small-group teaching. Acad Med (2006) 81:239–44.10.1097/00001888-200603000-00006
    1. Craig LB, Smith C, Crow SM, Driver W, Wallace M, Thompson BM. Obstetrics and gynecology clerkship for males and females: similar curriculum, different outcomes? Med Educ Online (2013) 18:21506.10.3402/meo.v18i0.21506

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere