Comparison of effectiveness of 4% articaine associated with 1: 100,000 or 1: 200,000 epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve block

Giovana Radomille Tófoli, Juliana Cama Ramacciato, Patrícia Cristine de Oliveira, Maria Cristina Volpato, Francisco Carlos Groppo, José Ranali, Giovana Radomille Tófoli, Juliana Cama Ramacciato, Patrícia Cristine de Oliveira, Maria Cristina Volpato, Francisco Carlos Groppo, José Ranali

Abstract

This comparative study using 20 healthy volunteers evaluated the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine in association with 2 different concentrations of epinephrine, 1:200,000 (G1) and 1:100,000 (G2). The first premolars were tested with a pulp tester to verify the anesthesia induced by the inferior alveolar nerve block. The following parameters were measured: period of latency (PL; interval between the end of anesthetic injection and absence of response to the maximum output--80 reading--of the pulp tester); complete pulpal anesthesia (CPA; period in which the subject had no response to maximal output of the pulp tester 80 reading); partial anesthesia (PA; interval between the first reading below 80 and the return to basal levels); and the anesthesia of the soft tissues (AST; period of time from onset of anesthesia until the return to normal sensation of the lip). The Wilcoxon test (alpha = 0.05) was used to analyze the data. No significant difference was found regarding PL (P = .47), CPA (P = .88), PA (P = .46), and AST (P = .85). The results indicated that both solutions presented the same clinical effectiveness in blocking the inferior alveolar nerve.

References

    1. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1999 Dec;15(6):247-51
    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 1963 Mar;66:337-40
    1. Scand J Dent Res. 1972;80(4):272-8
    1. J Prosthet Dent. 1973 Jan;29(1):84-7
    1. Int J Oral Surg. 1974;3(6):422-7
    1. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980 Jul;50(1):66-73
    1. J Can Dent Assoc. 1984 Sep;50(9):703-8
    1. J Can Dent Assoc. 1987 Jan;53(1):29-31
    1. J Can Dent Assoc. 1987 Jan;53(1):38-42
    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989 Mar;118(3):305-10
    1. Chronobiol Int. 1989;6(2):157-62
    1. Dent Update. 1988 Jun;Suppl II:S21-4
    1. Quintessenz. 1990 Jul;41(7):1207-16
    1. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1990 Oct;45(10):629-32
    1. J Can Dent Assoc. 1991 Mar;57(3):217-23
    1. Anesth Prog. 1990 Sep-Oct;37(5):230-7
    1. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1991;101(10):1286-90
    1. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992 Jan;73(1):103-8
    1. Anesth Pain Control Dent. 1992 Spring;1(2):77-80
    1. Reg Anesth. 1993 Jan-Feb;18(1):6-12
    1. J Can Dent Assoc. 1994 Sep;60(9):825-8; 831-4
    1. Anesth Prog. 1993;40(4):114-6
    1. Oper Dent. 1996 Jan-Feb;21(1):25-30
    1. Anesth Prog. 1997 Fall;44(4):132-41
    1. J Endod. 1997 Mar;23(3):178-80
    1. Ann Anat. 1999 Jan;181(1):105-6
    1. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 May;57(5):510-4; discussion 515
    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 May;130(5):701-9
    1. Prim Dent Care. 2001 Oct;8(4):139-42

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere